Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Silltruten!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:47, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Contents

File:Tetraophasis szechenyii.jpgEdit

 
File:Tetraophasis szechenyii.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 15:42, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

ː@Elisfkc This is very weird, found this without copyright on FlickRː https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/22702090910/. Has that user uploaded an image with copyright, nicked it from somebody else? Silltruten (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Image problemsEdit

On many of your recent Flickr uploads you have changed the licence tag for that on Flickr to a different one; mostly you have put cc-by-sa-4.0 when the original licence is cc-by-sa-20. Because you simply cropped the images so you have no rights to chnage the licence under which the image is released, when uploaded here. You must retain the same licence as the original. I've fixed as many as I see but you may want to review the rest of your uploads. Please be more careful in future. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 17:36, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry, I just mistakenly assumed that cc-by-sa-4.0 just was the current version and was to be used irrespective of which cc-by-sa the image was released under. I'll go through the uploads. It won't happen again. Silltruten (talk) 18:38, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Per Holmen's photosEdit

Please note that Per Holmen's photos are not available under CC-by-SA as I thought. All his photos are going to be deleted. This is due to a miscommunication between him and me. I'm not sure what communications you had with him. JMK (talk) 20:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for infoǃ I've been in contact with him. On a direct question whether it was ok to make them available under CC or CC-by-SA, Per said that as long as he was credited and there was a link to his website, it was ok. But maybe he has changed his mind? I'll double check with him. Silltruten (talk) 21:07, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
JMK, just been in touch with Per, and as with me there was a misunderstanding concerning his images. He does not want to release them under CC-by-SA. Will you delete the one's I've uploaded as well? I do not have the authority. Thanks in advanceǃ Silltruten (talk) 23:48, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Appreciate your info. Will file a deletion request that includes your uploads. JMK (talk) 12:35, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The deletion request is here: Deletion requests/Per Holmen photos. JMK (talk) 15:07, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2CommonsEdit

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. Elisfkc (talk) 03:14, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I wasn't aware of that toolǃ I'll use it in the future. All the best, Silltruten (talk) 15:25, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Flickr2CommonsEdit

I have just come across a few images you have recently uploaded from Flickr. I would appreciate it if in the future, you used the Flickr2Commons tool. This tool allows images to be moved to Commons from Flickr without having to download the images to your own computer. It also brings in the largest resolution of the image, as well making sure to list the correct license and url, making it easy for the automated Flickr Review system. Also, it is fairly easy to categorize images with this tool. To use it, you just need to go to the url and authorize it (where it says "authorise first"). Elisfkc (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm sorry, the authorization doesn't work, I get this error message: "Error retrieving token: mwoauthdatastore-request-token-not-found". Some of the images have to be cropped in order to be correctly displayed in the Wikipedia App, that's why I want to download them first. Is there anything wrong with the resolution, links or the categorization? AFAIK I've done it correctly.Silltruten (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Woodward's Batis.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Woodward's Batis.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Woodward's Batis.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:43, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Silltruten".