User talk:SlimVirgin

Wilhelm Reich - Why reverted?Edit

Hiya.

Can you explain why File:Wilhelm_Reich_in_his_mid-twenties.JPG was reverted?

Harvest316 (talk) 03:54, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Harvest316, your upload overrode the image that was there, and replaced it with an entirely different one. If you want to upload yours, and if it is free (not under copyright), that should be done under a different file name. SlimVirgin (talk) 04:32, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

File:FGM in Africa with names.pngEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FGM in Africa with names.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 11:46, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Church noticeboard, Praia da Luz, Portugal, 2010.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Church noticeboard, Praia da Luz, Portugal, 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

FlickrEdit

Search Flickr for images with the keywords: Praia da Luz under these licenses: cc-by or cc-by-sa

File:Selection Birkenau ramp.jpgEdit

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Selection Birkenau ramp.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

New rightEdit

Hi, per your comment at Magnus Manske's talk page, I just added the "image reviewer" right to your account. (See Commons:License review for details.) I believe this is the thing that will enable a new button on the Upload Wizard. You should be able to easily import files from Flickr, also entire sets, just by entering the URL (provided they are tagged with CC BY on Flickr). I think (but am not certain) this is separate from the Flickr2Commons tool. Give it a try -- I hope this helps! (ps -- now that you have the right, I believe you are also able to grant it to others at your discretion. Please take appropriate precautions that users understand our licensing policies if you do so.) -Pete F (talk) 00:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Pete, thank you, that's very thoughtful. It'll be a great help because I keep seeing multiple free images that would be good on Commons, but downloading then uploading manually is time-consuming. SlimVirgin (talk) 01:47, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

RenamingEdit

Hi SlimVirgin, I just noticed this rename, and wanted to remind you of COM:RENAME. "More descriptive" is not a valid criteria (and to be frank, changing a date to an author is only "differently descriptive" IMO anyway). Page name stability is more important on Commons than on en-wiki, because external reusers may link the original file name as part of the attribution requirements (and unused redirects are often deleted). Cheers. --99of9 (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay, thank you, 99of9, I'll bear that in mind in future. The issue is that I had uploaded another one a while ago with a more descriptive name, but it was a duplicate of this one, so mine was deleted. That left this one, calling it Marshalsea Jail (it's known as Marshalsea prison), and with a typo in the title. Because I use it in a featured article, I thought I would fix it, and it made sense to add the artist's name at that point, because we have so many images of the Marshalsea. But I do take your point about stability. Best, SlimVirgin (talk) 07:02, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Veganz, Schivelbeiner Straße 34, Berlin, June 2012.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Veganz, Schivelbeiner Straße 34, Berlin, June 2012.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Thabks, JuTa, for some reason Upload Wizard didn't add the licence, and I didn't notice it hadn't done that, so I've done it manually. Thanks for pointing it out. SlimVirgin (talk) 02:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Btw you should fix the trash of your common.js, that reads
// Add a custom category to all my upload wizard uploads
autoAdd.categories.push("Files uploaded by Rillke");
// Add a custom license tag to all my files uploaded using the sorcerer
autoAdd.wikitext += "{{My custom information or re-using tag}}"; 

--Achim (talk) 18:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Achim, thank you! I've been wondering where on earth that came from. :) SlimVirgin (talk) 18:49, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Welcome! :) --Achim (talk) 18:53, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "SlimVirgin".