Open main menu

Contents

GareEdit

Bonjour vous avez modifié les catégories alors quelle étaient biens écrites car il est inutile de ce servir de la ou le ou les au début. On se repère par le nom directement et nom le pronom.

cordialement

--Parisdreux (d) 12:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Les déterminants ce placent à la fin (ex Gare de La Loupe = Loupe (La)) mais pour la catégorie le déterminant n'est pas utile. Pour la suppression du mot gare dans la catégorie ligne paris - Brest cela était fait exprès car il sont tous écrit avec un G comme gare car il peut y avoir d'autre sous catégorie. --Parisdreux (d) 17:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Spendeau!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 708bed7333e27d5a3216099bcab50642Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

>meaningful categories< and {categorise}Edit

Hi, thank you for using >meaningful categories< and respecting {categorise}, i.e. avoid to use 'main caregories. Instead, please do categorise

  1. p.e. Category:Unidentified locations in Karnataka instead of Category:India.
  2. p.e. Category:Schools in Bangalore instead of Category:Bangalore.
  3. p.e. Category:Bangalore Palace instead of Category:Bangalore.

Thx and regards, Roland zh 20:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I, these 3 photos were not categorise, so i just categorised them quikly and simply!

Thanks for your message. --Spendeau (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Black PearlEdit

Bonjour, merci d'avoir rajouté une catégorie au fichier mais j'ai un doute pour 1948; Je viens de trouver ceci: http://www.letelegramme.fr/cotesarmor/bar-goelette-un-concept-original-a-perros-guirec-04-10-2014-10370687.php Etant pas loin, j'essaierai de me renseigner prochainement. Cordialement.--Spendeau (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

De rien. Je n'ai pas voulu aller trop loin, n'ayant eu aucune certitude sur la meilleure catégorisation. L'idée était de susciter la réflexion en catégorisant dans une catégorie si générique (et rouge). Pour moi, celui-ci ne ressemble pas au Category:Black Pearl (ship, 1948)... Et vu l'article du Télégramme, j'aurai tendance à catégoriser rapidement dans Category:Black Pearl (ship, 1983). Bonne journée, --Fab5669 (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

De728631 (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Roche des poètes Médaillon Anatole Le Braz.JPGEdit

 
File:Roche des poètes Médaillon Anatole Le Braz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

86.217.67.11 13:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Phare de Ploum CA 1940.JPGEdit

 
File:Phare de Ploum CA 1940.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 10:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Montmagny tangentielle nord.JPGEdit

 
File:Montmagny tangentielle nord.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

78.234.174.130 07:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Stade du ETG.jpgEdit

Bonjour.

J'ai annulé votre ajout de la catégorie : Buildings in Seynod car cette ancienne photo ne peut absolument pas être la photo d'un stade de la ville de Seynod (Annecy). Car :

  • autant que je m'en souvienne (j'ai habité Annecy pendant 10 ans et je connais bien la ville de Seynod), je n'ai pas la mémoire d'un stade de Seynod dans un tel environnement urbain et aussi dense que le montre la photo ;
  • il n'y a pas de voie ferrée à proximité d'un quelconque stade à Seynod ;
  • et, par ailleur, la voie ferrée qui passe à Annecy est à voie unique (Ligne d'Aix-les-Bains-Le Revard à Annemasse) ; or dans cette photo on voit une double voie avec au loin ce qui semble être les quais d'une gare (surement pas celle d'Annecy).

A mon avis, vu le nom de l'image "Stade du ETG.jpg", j'aurais tendance à croire que le sigle "ETG" dans le nom de l'image correspond au sigle de l'ancien club de foot "Évian-Thonon-Gaillard Football Club". Auquel cas, cette photo pourrait être celle de l'ancien stade de Thonon-les-Bains (cette vue Google me le laisserait penser aussi). Mais ne connaissant pas l'histoire de cette ville ni son stade, je ne m'avancerais pas à catégoriser cette photo dans Category:Buildings in Thonon-les-Bains. --Poudou99 (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Merci, je vais essayer de creuser un peu --Spendeau (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Spendeau".