Gare edit

Bonjour vous avez modifié les catégories alors quelle étaient biens écrites car il est inutile de ce servir de la ou le ou les au début. On se repère par le nom directement et nom le pronom.

cordialement

--Parisdreux (d) 12:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Les déterminants ce placent à la fin (ex Gare de La Loupe = Loupe (La)) mais pour la catégorie le déterminant n'est pas utile. Pour la suppression du mot gare dans la catégorie ligne paris - Brest cela était fait exprès car il sont tous écrit avec un G comme gare car il peut y avoir d'autre sous catégorie. --Parisdreux (d) 17:06, 2 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Spendeau!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 708bed7333e27d5a3216099bcab50642 edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Autopatrol given edit

 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:46, 12 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

>meaningful categories< and {categorise} edit

Hi, thank you for using >meaningful categories< and respecting {categorise}, i.e. avoid to use 'main caregories. Instead, please do categorise

  1. p.e. Category:Unidentified locations in Karnataka instead of Category:India.
  2. p.e. Category:Schools in Bangalore instead of Category:Bangalore.
  3. p.e. Category:Bangalore Palace instead of Category:Bangalore.

Thx and regards, Roland zh 20:27, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I, these 3 photos were not categorise, so i just categorised them quikly and simply!

Thanks for your message. --Spendeau (talk) 20:32, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Black Pearl edit

Bonjour, merci d'avoir rajouté une catégorie au fichier mais j'ai un doute pour 1948; Je viens de trouver ceci: http://www.letelegramme.fr/cotesarmor/bar-goelette-un-concept-original-a-perros-guirec-04-10-2014-10370687.php Etant pas loin, j'essaierai de me renseigner prochainement. Cordialement.--Spendeau (talk) 11:18, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

De rien. Je n'ai pas voulu aller trop loin, n'ayant eu aucune certitude sur la meilleure catégorisation. L'idée était de susciter la réflexion en catégorisant dans une catégorie si générique (et rouge). Pour moi, celui-ci ne ressemble pas au Category:Black Pearl (ship, 1948)... Et vu l'article du Télégramme, j'aurai tendance à catégoriser rapidement dans Category:Black Pearl (ship, 1983). Bonne journée, --Fab5669 (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Roche des poètes Médaillon Anatole Le Braz.JPG edit

 
File:Roche des poètes Médaillon Anatole Le Braz.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.217.67.11 13:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Phare de Ploum CA 1940.JPG edit

 
File:Phare de Ploum CA 1940.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:40, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Montmagny tangentielle nord.JPG edit

 
File:Montmagny tangentielle nord.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

78.234.174.130 07:55, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey edit

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey edit

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Stade du ETG.jpg edit

Bonjour.

J'ai annulé votre ajout de la catégorie : Buildings in Seynod car cette ancienne photo ne peut absolument pas être la photo d'un stade de la ville de Seynod (Annecy). Car :

  • autant que je m'en souvienne (j'ai habité Annecy pendant 10 ans et je connais bien la ville de Seynod), je n'ai pas la mémoire d'un stade de Seynod dans un tel environnement urbain et aussi dense que le montre la photo ;
  • il n'y a pas de voie ferrée à proximité d'un quelconque stade à Seynod ;
  • et, par ailleur, la voie ferrée qui passe à Annecy est à voie unique (Ligne d'Aix-les-Bains-Le Revard à Annemasse) ; or dans cette photo on voit une double voie avec au loin ce qui semble être les quais d'une gare (surement pas celle d'Annecy).

A mon avis, vu le nom de l'image "Stade du ETG.jpg", j'aurais tendance à croire que le sigle "ETG" dans le nom de l'image correspond au sigle de l'ancien club de foot "Évian-Thonon-Gaillard Football Club". Auquel cas, cette photo pourrait être celle de l'ancien stade de Thonon-les-Bains (cette vue Google me le laisserait penser aussi). Mais ne connaissant pas l'histoire de cette ville ni son stade, je ne m'avancerais pas à catégoriser cette photo dans Category:Buildings in Thonon-les-Bains. --Poudou99 (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Merci, je vais essayer de creuser un peu --Spendeau (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Gare de Namps Maisnil.jpg edit

4nn1l2 (talk) 12:10, 21 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey edit

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you Spendeau Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 03:30, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply