Open main menu
Note: I don't check this page so often, so, if your message is urgent, please use my talk page at pt.wikipedia.
Click here to leave me a message at pt.wikipedia
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stegop!

Contents

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Stegop!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:21, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 863f1c037f9ca035c38c468e1892c401Edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Vc que é usuário da wiki.ptEdit

Gostaria de trocar umas ideias com vc. mande um e-mail para leandrorocha1985@gmail.com que te adicionarei no MSN. Tem algumas coisas que preciso falar com vc. abç! Leandro Rocha (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated LicenseEdit

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Great Mosque Diyabakir.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 04:37, 5 June 2010 (UTC)


File:Wappen Diyarbakir.jpgEdit

 
File:Wappen Diyarbakir.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jutta234 (talk) 18:06, 3 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Erzurum wappen.pngEdit

 
File:Erzurum wappen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jutta234 (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

fotosEdit

salve Stegop! obrigado pelos elogios, rsrs, fico feliz que tenha gostado. mas dei uma olhada no seu álbum de atenas e tb fiquei encantado, vc tem imagens excelentes da acrópole, da academia, da stoa de átalo e do museu arqueológico, e muitas outras. fiquei especialmente impressionado com o seu aproveitamento da luz e ótimo senso de composição. posso perguntar qual equipamento vc usou? tetraktys (talk) 06:35, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

valeu a dica do equipamento. estou precisando trocar a minha câmera e vou dar uma olhada em algo semelhante à sua. parece que funciona muito bem. abz! tetraktys (talk) 20:17, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

rsrsrs eu tb fico meio perdido com a variedade de equipamento disponível hoje em dia. fui à europa mês passado e quase comprei uma câmara lá, mas por sorte me contive, em viagem de turismo é muita correria e não dá tempo de analisar as opções com calma. entretanto, a câmara que eu levei, uma pocket da sony de 7.0 Mpx, fez um péssimo trabalho em interiores, toneladas de ruído e péssimo foco. em dias de muito sol ela tb foi um fracasso, com contrastes completamente descontrolados. eu não tinha como conferir as imagens em tela grande durante a viagem e só fui me dar conta quando votei pra casa. perdi quase 1/3 das fotos, quase me arranquei os cabelos... eu estava bem tranquilo, pois na viagem anterior levei uma similar, até menos potente, e o resultado geral foi muito superior. tetraktys (talk) 01:00, 26 July 2010 (UTC) obrigado por mais essas dicas Stegop! abraços! tetraktys (talk) 06:34, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kirklareli cansu KFL kirksehitler aniti.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kirklareli cansu KFL kirksehitler aniti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kirklareli cansu KFL kirksehitler aniti.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Geagea (talk) 03:40, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Mimar hazalKayseriFuarKulturpark.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mimar hazalKayseriFuarKulturpark.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mimar hazalKayseriFuarKulturpark.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Geagea (talk) 00:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Mimar hazal KayseriGevherNesibeHospital1210Detail.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mimar hazal KayseriGevherNesibeHospital1210Detail.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mimar hazal KayseriGevherNesibeHospital1210Detail.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Geagea (talk) 01:24, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Liceo Italiano.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Liceo Italiano.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Liceo Italiano.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:03, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:RobertCollegeConstruction.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RobertCollegeConstruction.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:RobertCollegeConstruction.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Istanbul_Modern3_nicocrisafulli.jpgEdit

 
File:Istanbul_Modern3_nicocrisafulli.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

DREdit

Ne yazık ki hâlâ dahası var. Kullanıcılar başta Wow Turkey olmak üzere diğer sitelerden dosyaları kopyalayıp buraya yüklediler. Şimdiye kadar hiç kontrol edilmemiş dosyalar bizi bekliyor. İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 23:58, 11 January 2012 (UTC)


File:Istanbul Modern 187 3382 honeyroastd.jpgEdit

 
File:Istanbul Modern 187 3382 honeyroastd.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 08:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:İYTE Rectorate.jpgEdit

 
File:İYTE Rectorate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Oludeniz03.jpgEdit

 
File:Oludeniz03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Great Mosque Diyabakir.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Great Mosque Diyabakir.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Great Mosque Diyabakir.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Takabeg (talk) 06:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

CategoryEdit

Hi, Stegop. How are you ? Are you sure ? I'm not sure :) Takabeg (talk) 00:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Thank youEdit

For your baklava, ouzo (personally, I prefer metaxa) and congratulations. I appreciate it. Cheers! Tango7174 (talk) 14:00, 31 March 2012 (UTC).

File:Onatkutlar.jpgEdit

 
File:Onatkutlar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Ancient Seljuks Shipyard-mulazimoglu.jpgEdit

 
File:Ancient Seljuks Shipyard-mulazimoglu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vito Genovese 14:55, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

correctionEdit

This image does not belong to Istanbul

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Istanbul-1959_09_hg.jpg

You can read the description on this page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hgrobe#One_question

so gives false information in your pictures on your page

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Stegop/Imagens_antigas_de_Istambul

pt:Muralhas de Constantinopla em 1959

You can find a lot of historical image about Istanbul to this page

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/search/?q=turkey

--Tarih (talk) 01:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Mocambique-escudo.jpgEdit

 
File:Mocambique-escudo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 13:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

File:DSC03622pano.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:54, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:AntepGaziler.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:AntepGaziler.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Bulwersator (talk) 13:18, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Djerba contributionsEdit

Hello Stegop,
Thanks to you for your picture contributions and your great work on the categories related to Djerba and Tunisia !! Moumou82 (talk) 18:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

No tool unfortunately but, as you said, good and plain "eye and brain". I organize those categories related to Tunisia since 2006 so I am used to identify pictures pretty easily. However, it is true some semi-automated tools would be very handy. It would be worth asking at the Village pump. It may exist but I don't know it. Moumou82 (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

File:AntepGaziler.jpgEdit

 
File:AntepGaziler.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 11:06, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol givenEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50, move up to 32 pages per minute instead of 8, and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you.

Hey! Sim, já há muito tempo... Tudo começou porque precisei de ilustrar alguns artigos, e a secção de imagens da Madeira e Funchal estava uma miséria franciscana, e o pouco que tinha estava desorganizadíssimo. Vai daí comecei a carregar material, a organizar, e quando dei por mim já estava num alhinho em decifrar coisas estranhíssimas, como por exemplo, separar uma barouche dum fiacre. Ou pior, a catalogar as dezenas de templos hindus de Bhubaneswar por templo e época de construção. Claro que não é o tipo de coisa que se possa contar aos amigos quando se sai à noite (a não ser que se esteja muito bêbado), mas aprende-se mais nisso que em qualquer documentário do canal História, e é coisa que se pode fazer no sossego e na paz sem ter um bando de trolls à perna. E tem o lado prático da coisa, que é ficares a saber a rodos de copyright. De modo que pronto, mudei-me para aqui...

Não precisas de agradecer a flag, como sabes isso serve mais para a gente do que para ti, mas se te der jeito alguma das outras realmente úteis, faz o pedido, que não deve haver qualquer entrave.

Abraço, -- Darwin Ahoy! 02:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Já está. Mas este mundo é realmente pequeno, o meu irmão esteve num casamento em Quadrazais não tem dois meses! Às tantas este JC também lá estava... -- Darwin Ahoy! 21:20, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
  Done. Mas nenhum dos ficheiros estava em uso, talvez alguém consertou isso antes (até porque nem fazia muito sentido alguém querer usar aquilo).-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Ayyachi.jpegEdit

 
File:Ayyachi.jpeg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans | العربية | asturianu | azərbaycanca | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски | svenska | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

You should have reacted when you removed the watermark... --Litlok (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani.gifEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:38, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani-crop.gifEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani-crop.gif. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Achaemenid Derafsh-Kaviani-crop.gif]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Raoli ✉ (talk) 02:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Kartal winter.jpgEdit

 
File:Kartal winter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rapsar (talk) 00:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


Sobre Foto duplicadaEdit

Hola. File:Puerta Monaita 3a - Albaicín - Granada - ESP.JPG, cargada en setiembre de 2012 es la misma foto que File:PuertaMonaita.JPG, por lo que una de ellas debe ser borrada. En condiciones normales, creo que debería ser la primera, por ser mas nueva y por tener menos resolución, pero como la primera fue cargada por el autor, no sé que se debe hacer. Saludos. --Stegop (talk) 22:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

RE: Foto duplicadaEdit

Soy el autor. Sería mejor borrar la última, que fue la que participó en Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Es cierto que ambas son la misma fotografía y no recordaba haberla subido antes.


EstrelaEdit

Obrigado por sua gentileza. Agora você poderia me tirar uma dúvida? Vou dar como exemplo este mapa: File:RomanEmpire 117-pt.svg. No meu navegador quando eu acesso este ou qualquer mapa em miniatura que eu tenha utilizado letras em algum caminho não reto como as palavras Ponto Euxino ou África Procunsular, aqui elas aparecem demasiadamente tortas, enquanto que ao acessar a imagem em seu tamanho original isto não se verifica. Isso é normal dos tamanhos menores? Eu sei que sempre há certa distorção em relação ao original, mas não sabia que era tanta...--Renato de carvalho ferreira (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Pós-processamentoEdit

oi! Não esqueci da tua mensagem e vou respondê-la. É que eu estou focado em acabar de carregar as fotos! Volto! Boas! José Luiz disc 00:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Serra de São Mamede and non-political geographyEdit

With all respect towards your opinion, I am not aware that there is any political claim in the name 'Montes de Toledo'. As far as geographical texts say it is just a physiographic name for the greater mountain system and as far as I know there is no alternative name for it. If there was one I would use it.

Only from the point of view of Physical geography the Serra de São Mamede is part of one of the mountain systems of the Iberian Peninsula that are shared between Spain and Portugal. There is absolutely no political intention on the issue. I think that at least for the sake of Geographic accuracy, in the same manner as the 'Category:Serra da Estrela' is part of the 'Category:Sistema Central', 'Category:Serra de São Mamede' should remain part of 'Category:Montes de Toledo'. Please note that I have made some alterations to the 'Category:Montes de Toledo' replacing the word 'Spain' with 'Iberian Peninsula' in the introductory paragraph. I hope this is to your satisfaction and I assure you that I have no political agenda, always striving towards the utmost neutrality.Xufanc (talk) 03:25, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your consideration. It indeed sounds strange. But in Spain they do tell us in school since we are kids that there are two unidades de relieve en el centro de la Meseta, the Sistema Central and the Montes de Toledo and they refer to the latter in a wider sense, stretching way west into Extremadura. In this pdf-Geografia de Extremadura for example you can see that the mountains across Extremadura are considered as part of the Montes de Toledo. Geophysically the system does indeed form a whole, the common structure of the Serra de São Mamede in Portugal and the Sierra de San Pedro across the border can be perceived in Google Earth. What really sounds a bit Frankenstein, as you rightly say, is the name. I don't know why the geographers could not come up with a more satisfactory name that would not be centered in a Spanish town way to the east. I think that in the absence of a better name, it is better to consider it merely as an academic geographical term, for the truth is that even in Spain the local inhabitants generally refer to the mountain ranges in their area by their own names and totally ignore the wider "sistemas" or "unidades de relieve". Xufanc (talk) 00:51, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC) PigeonIP (talk) 17:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


Hi Stegop, instead of Panorâmicas de Istambul, Panoramics of Istanbul would be a more approprirate name. Is that o.k. for you?
Also instead of Imagens antigas de Istambul, Old images of Istanbul would be better. --Túrelio (talk) 08:47, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Stegop,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Foto de convenção do P.M.D.B.Edit

Gostaria de chamar à sua atenção este (repetido) pedido de recuperação de uma imagem. Esta mostrava parte da platéia numa convenção partidária do P.M.D.B., e era a única da respetiva categoria a mostrar apoiantes anónimos, ao invés de manda-chuva. Apesar de eu ter argumentado com esse ponto, a foto foi apagada, tida por irrelevante e sem interesse enciclopédico (contrastando com o modo como fotos semelhantes de outros países são consideradas), e a sua recuperação subsequentemente pedida foi recusada, por «falta de apoio». Estou, pois, agora alertando utilizadores brasileiros do Commons para que manifestem a sua opinião. -- Tuválkin 02:49, 17 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Stegop,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

QI nominationsEdit

Hi. I noticed you nominated about 15 images at COM:QIC today. Please don't do such mass-nominations again - it's considered flooding the board. Limit yourself to a couple per day. That also increases your chances of people reviewing them. I hope you enjoy your time at QIC, and look forward to seeing your reviews and nominations. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:01, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

QI reviewsEdit

It is good practice in QIC to let the first reviewer decide first, if he made a request. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Since it is not the first time that you "promote" like this I think you should know two things. There is a gadget called QIVoter (did you see the red strip when you edit QIC?), you should use it, because you are introducing to many parameters when introducing "|". Furthermore you only promote changing the header of the template from Nomination to Promotion. As said, I recommend you to use the QIvoter for that. Poco2 21:30, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!Edit

 

Hi Stegop, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | 中文(臺灣) | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 21:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Vertical vs horizontal perspective "corrections"Edit

Hello, I just saw your long comment in QIC about perspective corrections. I do clearly distinguish between vertical and horizontal correction. A vertical deviation is always understood as a problem, either due to a missing perspective correction or due to a tilt. A missing of horizontal lines is in many cases IMHO not required because the fact that I photograph a subject from a plane which is not parallel to the subject is not an actual problem. It is only a problem if I do look for symmetry. I do still agree with you that the tolerance with vertical perspective issues is pretty low here...Poco2 21:42, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cnossos-stegop-53-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Review of QIEdit

Helloǃ I've seen your review of my image File:Paris, Litfasssäule -- 2014 -- 1169.jpg. Your decision was QI but you didn't set it to "Promotion". It would by very kind to do this. Please have a look to "Evaluating images". First a review has to be done, then the decision for "promotion" or "decline". If there are different options you - as reviewer or author - can set to "Discuss". It s more easier to use the QI vote helper. You'll find this tool in your preferences. I wish you much joy in the assessment. (Honestly, at first I also had major problems. To date, however, some things are still a bit difficult.) --XRay talk 07:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

CategorizationEdit

Sorry about that. If it's the set I'm thinking of, I seem to recall it was improperly labeled on Flickr, so I may easily have erred in my category choice. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao (talk) 01:05, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cnossos-stegop-47-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dories-59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. However, it is a small image, based on the fact that your camera can deliver 3,264 × 2,448 px. Consider to donate higher resolutions. --Cccefalon 06:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Per your concerns, I will no longer do any categorization in NepalEdit

Hope that helps. I've done categorization work for years here and only had a few complaints. Hundreds of categories I created years ago are still alive and thriving. So I'll concentrate on places where my work is appreciated. (I expect a complaint now and then from an Indian editor, but he is always right and I learn from him.) Best wishes in your Nepal work. Parabolooidal (talk) 01:46, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dories-59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --Mattbuck 11:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

About your reviews of my QI nominationsEdit

Thanks for reviewing my QI nominations so quickly (and for supporting one  ). I'll try to fix the greenish sky in the Jackson Township picture tomorrow (though I don't think it's an egregious problem). I intentionally made the Montour Power Plant picture kind of dark. I figured darkness would go better with the theme of power plants spewing gases into the sky. --Jakob (talk) 01:32, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cnossos-stegop-51-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Needs perspective correction. Please reduce the vignetting top right. Consider to focus on the important parts of the archeological excavation (not relevant for my QI assessment, just a proposal) --Cccefalon 06:09, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't see any vignetting or perspective distortion; the gradient on the sky is natural and there is no way of knowing which line is naturally straight or not. --Stegop 14:56, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Look at the fence, you will notice, that it is leaning in. --Cccefalon 07:08, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
You were right. I uploaded another version, more or less following your suggestion of crop. --Stegop 01:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
It is now a really good and interesting photo. Well done! --Cccefalon 19:49, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dories-63.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

UauEdit

Que vergonha das minhas fotos todas tortas! Congrats! José Luiz disc 02:42, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Essas fotos de Creta são antigas? José Luiz disc 02:43, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
@Jbribeiro1: Tortas??? Que exagero! Eu é que devia ter vergonha por não oferecer mais fotos e não ser mais rápido a tratar as minhas fotos (ambas as coisas estão relacionadas entre elas e com o tempo que a wiki me tomava). Só agora estou a processar seriamente as fotos da Grécia de 2009 (!... pré-wiki). Um abraço. --Stegop (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

CatalunhaEdit

Boas, Stegop! Que bom saber que estás ainda por aqui! Eu adoro a península toda em todos os sentidos — especialmente a Catalunha — e vou voltar ainda para conhecer o País Basco (espanhol e francês). E você, tudo bem? Quando virá para o Brasil? José Luiz disc 01:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Aprendi que chove muito na costa do mar Cantábrico (acredita que não existe artigo na ptwiki para ele?) e preciso planejar bem para não errar. Desta vez, ainda em Barcelona, vi muitas notícias sobre tempestades e inundações na região... Você já foi para lá? José Luiz disc 02:29, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
@Jbribeiro1: Cantábrico propriamente dito só fui um par de vezes e conheço mal, mas não me esqueço de ter passado uns 10 dias em es:San Vicente de la Barquera em agosto e acho que só num dia é que não choveu e só metade dos dias é que vimos sol. Das duas vezes que estive em Compostela, uma em agosto e outra em setembro, foi a mesma coisa — naquelas paragens de um dia para outro passa-se do verão para o inverno. Com Bilbau foi quase a mesma coisa: a primeira vez que lá passei, no princípio de setembro, passei uns dias maravilhosos de verão em Paris, com noites quentes e tudo, mais parecia o Mediterrâneo em agosto e quando acordei em Bilbau foi como se tivesse saltado para dezembro. Nessa mesma viagem, à ida, quando passei pelo País Basco, Pamplona e Pirenéus, a sensação era de estar no inverno em Lisboa. Na segunda vez tive muito mais sorte: sol com fartura, quase verão, apesar de ser abril! Tivemos imensa sorte, pois ao contrário do que é hábito, não só o tempo estava bom como só aquela parte de Espanha é que não esteve sob um tempestade. A praia de Biarritz estava cheia de gente. No outro dia ouvi num programa de TV que a precipitação anual em Bilbau é o dobro da de Londres (sabe, aquela cidade que tem fama de nunca fazer sol... :-). --Stegop (talk) 03:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified locations in LisbonEdit

Atenção, esta categoria destina-se a locais efetivamente desconhecidos, não apenas para varrer para debaixo do tapete a avalanche de tralha não classificada que estava em Category:Lisbon. Coisas como esta são muito mau serviço. -- Tuválkin 11:47, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Devi surrender.jpgEdit

 
File:Devi surrender.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 03:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Butchers_in_MoroccoEdit

Grashoofd (talk) 05:46, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Views_of_Torre_de_BelémEdit

JotaCartas (talk) 03:31, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Template:TunisiamonthEdit

Hi Stegop. I see that you have create this template. But if you open the subcats of the Category:Months in Tunisia you will see that the template doesn't work correctly. Can you repair this defect? Thank you very much. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 17:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

DenghiùComm: What do you mean by "defect"? What doesn't work correctly? Anyway, the template is just an adaptation to Tunisia of other templates used for other countries. --Stegop (talk) 19:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
The automatically translation of categories make that they are red. Not useful. So the same cat must be add manually; and this is not correct. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
DenghiùComm: Maybe you are right; or maybe not... as there are many similar cases, so we can see it as a de facto standard, so perhaps it doesn't make much sense having Tunisia as an exception. --Stegop (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Please, can you show me the other cases? I don't now anything. Thank you. cheers,
DenghiùComm: I guess you can find many in Category:Category navigational templates for countries. Just a random example: {{Austriamonthyear}}. Cheers. --Stegop (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I will search some example near to this template. Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:HatemiUskudar.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:HatemiUskudar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HatemiUskudar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 19:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

File:AntepGaziler.jpgEdit

 
File:AntepGaziler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 10:36, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

File:GyongLaNJ9842.pngEdit

 
File:GyongLaNJ9842.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kazmi (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

File:Map of expansion of Caliphate-pt.svgEdit

Hello.

Can you add South Sudan in File:Map of expansion of Caliphate-pt.svg which you uploaded (and in other SVG maps where modern borders are particularly required for present-day maps if you have the time)?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files on 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 600 maps, but there is a long way to go.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.

Kindest regards.

Maphobbyist (talk) 01:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Ventura Porfirio-Jose Regio-Poeta de Deus e do Diabo.jpgEdit

 
File:Ventura Porfirio-Jose Regio-Poeta de Deus e do Diabo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Дима Г (talk) 02:58, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Дима Г (talk) 03:06, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sultan_Ahmed_I_Mosque_viewed_from_he_HippodromeEdit

E4024 (talk) 12:21, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear Stegop,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

File:GyongLaNJ9842.pngEdit

 
File:GyongLaNJ9842.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This, that and the other (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Stegop".