User talk:Steschke/Archiv2017

Falsche Links bei deinen Bildern

Bitte irreführenden Verlinkungen deines Benutzernamens auf de:Steschke und de:Benutzer:''Steschke'' korrigieren. Betrifft die Felder "Author" und "Attribution". --188.193.102.182 11:59, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Wo ist das Problem, IP? --ST ○ 12:20, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Es wird auf nicht existierende Seiten verlinkt. --188.193.102.182 12:57, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Mist.... Danke. --ST ○ 13:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-01-21 - Stefan Jagsch - 0951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-01-21 - Frank Franz - 0935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 10:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-01-21 - Daniel Lachmann - 0946.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 10:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-01-21 - Olaf Rose - 0938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 10:36, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Link Update

Hallo Sven,
auf deiner Benutzerseite, würde ich diesen Link updaten, nach dem der Inhalt verschoben wurde:

• Wikipedia-Bilderklau (http://bilderklau.lucan.de/blog/allgemein/geben_und_nehmen Wikipedia-Bilderklau)

müsste geändert werden in:

• Wikipedia-Bilderklau (http://lucan.de/geben_und_nehmen/ Wikipedia-Bilderklau)

Ich war schon dabei es selbst zu machen, als mir siedend heiß auf- und einfiel, dass ich mich ja auf einer fremden Benutzer-Seite befinde--Ciao--Bestoernesto (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Lieben Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hätte mich auch nicht beschwert, wenn... ;-) cu --ST ○ 16:11, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Den Quatsch

unterlassen. Danke. Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Was soll dein Vandalismus? --ST ○ 18:47, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Verkauf mich nicht für dumm, danke. Werbeaktionen kannst du dir an den Hut stecken. Mach dir mal Gedanken, ob deine Umtriebe noch mit unseren Projektzielen vereinbar sind. --Mai-Sachme (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Spare du dir lieber deine dumme Anmache. --ST ○ 18:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-03-31 - Yasmine-Belkaid - 1340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Steschke,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ukraine Oblast Cherson Verwaltung.jpg

Yours sincerely, ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 10:11, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Andreas Butzki - 1391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Jürgen Strohschein - 1399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Dietmar Eifler - 1416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 20:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Enrico Komning - 1432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Christoph Grimm - 1546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 03:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Bert Obereiner - 1420.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image looks good but the red category link needs fixing. When that is done, the image can be promoted.--Peulle 12:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC) @Peulle -  Done --Steschke 19:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC) Confirmed.--Peulle 11:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Dirk Stamer - 1613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 22:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Holger Kliewe - 1577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 22:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Helmut Holter - 1573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Olaf Kosinsky 22:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Tilo Gundlack - 1526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:46, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Katy Hoffmeister - 1657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Wolfgang Waldmüller - 1557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:37, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017-05-18 - Sylvia Bretschneider - 1620.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:25, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

File:2014-09-10 - Jens Zimmermann MdB - 7399.jpg

File:2014-09-10 - Jens Zimmermann MdB - 7399.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DaniKorn (talk) 09:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)