Diamantsmycke från 1700-talets början - Livrustkammaren - 97889.tif Zulu flag.svgAlpha flag.svg0-Nadazero.svg

Category:Police_motorcycles_in_ColombiaEdit

Gbawden (talk) 07:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

IMO 5375008Edit

Thanks for your message, this was an unconcious HotCat. I undid this change. Thanks Upior polnocy (talk) 11:37, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


Außenhafen EckernfördeEdit

Dear Stunteltje, I would be glad if you could help me categorizing some watercraft (particularly Capella, Freedom, Herta, Jachara and Schwalbe/ECKE15) I saw at Außenhafen Eckernförde. Many thanks in advance! -- Ies (talk) 10:10, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

  Done --Stunteltje (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very much, again! -- Ies (talk) 07:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


Fancy IIEdit

Dear Stunteltje, again I need some assistance in categorizing watercraft. It's the glass-bottom catamaran Fancy II of File:Puerto de Tazacorte Fancy 2014-10 01.JPG and File:Puerto de Tazacorte Fancy 2014-10 02.JPG I took more images of and from. See also Fancy II Can you help? -- Ies (talk) 14:57, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Difficult, indeed. Found no information on the ship herself on the internet. So Category:Fancy II (ship) is possible, and according the number on the bow Category:Fishing boats of Spain and Category:Glass bottom boats. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Ies (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

File:MS REGINA DELLA PACE.jpgEdit

Beste Stunteltje,

Ik kwam dit bestand tegen tijdens het verwerken van OTRS-mails. Zou jij hem misschien in de juiste categorie kunnen stoppen? Ik heb de ballen verstand van schepen. Natuur12 (talk) 21:17, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

User:4ing was me al voor. Prima opgelost. --Stunteltje (talk) 05:49, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Harriet_E_(ship,_1945)Edit

86.45.79.154 13:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

ENI 06002897Edit

Hallo Stunteltje, ich finde in allen Quellen die mir zur Verfügung stehen bei diesem Schiff nur das Baujahr 1996. [1] [2] [3]. Woher stammt die Information über das Baujahr 1991? Viele Grüße --Rolf H. (talk) 11:03, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Nach mein Ferien suche ich who es zu finden ist. Dass Schiff ist 2x fertig gestellt, denke ich. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:11, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Gefunden [4]] suche mit 23.31349 und 60.02897 letzte foto's. --Stunteltje (talk) 11:54, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


Category:A264 Trossö (ship, 1984)Edit

 
Category:A264 Trossö (ship, 1984) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saftgurka (talk) 11:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)


Category:R131 Norrköping (ship, 1973)Edit

 
Category:R131 Norrköping (ship, 1973) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

~~

Shipyard categoryEdit

Hej Stunteltje, a couple of days ago I had a discussion with a Bavarian user about the Category:Ship built at … His opinion is, that the shipyard category belongs to the ships name category and not to the IMO rsp. ENI category. My reasons and examples were not accepted and unfortunately I couldn’t find a corresponding regulation. Please let me know, if there is any (written) recommendation or policy. Greetings --Ein Dahmer (talk) 17:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

As far as I know there isn't a formal rule. It is just a matter of efficiency to add the shipyard category to the categories of IMO and ENI numbers. I myself always add the yard category to these numbers only, much easier and less confusing. The yard only builds one ship, that sometimes gets different names during her lifetime. The same reason to add only IMO and ENI numbers to scrapping categories. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:44, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your statement and I agree with you. However, the reasonable application is no compensation for a written regulation and so far, we will not reach a uniform usage for these categories. Bedankt --Ein Dahmer (talk) 20:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Reaction ferryEdit

Hi Stunteltje, please rethink this and this your edit. Reaction ferry article says: "A reaction ferry is a cable ferry that uses the reaction of the current of a river against a fixed tether to propel the vessel across the river." I have no idea how the reaction ferry would work without cables (or chains). The distinction is only in the fact that reaction ferry enables to set the angle of the ship (pram, boat) towards the stream. Technically, both types - the reaction ferry as well as the simple cable ferry can have overhead cable as well as underwater or floating cable. --ŠJů (talk) 17:58, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

You are right. I was confused by the fact that we here in the Netherlands - as far as I found with my ship on our rivers - only have reaction ferries with an anchor and a chain with supporting small boats to move the ferries. And reacted too fast. Regret inconvenience caused. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:San Francisco Belle (sternwheeler)Edit

Any chance you can give this category the IMO treatment, please? Sadly, it doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia article yet. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

doppelte KategorieEdit

Moin Stunteltje, folgende Frage, ist es ok, das es zwei Kategorien für ein und dasselbe Schiff gibt? Siehe bitte [5] + [6] Gruß von der Havel -- Biberbaer (talk) 08:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Ist OK. Dasselbe Schiff, aber mit andere Name, hat mehrere Category:Ships by name, aber nur 1 Category:Ships by IMO number. Sehe auch Category:IMO 5014123. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
ok, bedankt -- Biberbaer (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
I like to learn more Mdsaifhassanee58 (talk) 08:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Grote_Sluis,_HoornEdit

Achim (talk) 20:49, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. My "documentation gives only: "Kleine Oostsluis (dv opening 1)", but: User:Dqfn13 lives in Hoorn. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

POTY errorEdit

Hi Stunteltje, sorry for the inconveniences you experienced at this year's Picture of the Year. Since the error you reported is a server error, I suggest you simply re-try it. Thanks. -- Rillke(q?) 12:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I did. --Stunteltje (talk) 14:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
It still doesn't work and bring up the same error message? -- Rillke(q?) 14:58, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
It worked and I saw no new error up till now. --Stunteltje (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


Category:T101 Perseus (ship, 1950)Edit

 
Category:T101 Perseus (ship, 1950) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saftgurka (talk) 12:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


Category:T51 Lysekil (ship, 1959)Edit

 
Category:T51 Lysekil (ship, 1959) has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saftgurka (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Patria (ship, 1999)Edit

Hoi Stunteltje, I have relocated these images to Category:Patria (ship, 1995). Please see the IMO number visible in File:PATRIA 4.JPG and DNV GL's registry. De728631 (talk) 23:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Correct. See also: Shipspotting and Equasis. Thanks.--Stunteltje (talk) 05:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Could youEdit

please have a look at two new categroies: Category:IMO 9723136 & Category:Ultra Jaguar (ship, 2016)? Thanks for your time!   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Found different countries for registration. Shipspotting and Maritime-Connector give Panama, but Marine Traffic and Equasis give the Marshall Islands.
  • IMO number : 9723136
  • Name of ship : ULTRA JAGUAR (since 01/01/2016)
  • Call Sign : V7QK4
  • MMSI : 538006707
  • Gross tonnage : 43036 (since 01/01/2016)
  • DWT : 81922
  • Type of ship : Bulk Carrier (since 01/01/2016)
  • Year of build : 2016
  • Flag : Marshall Islands (since 01/01/2016)
  • Status of ship : In Service/Commission (since 07/01/2016)
  • Last update : 10/01/2017

So I assume it has to be Marshall Islands, as this is information from the AIS transponder system of the ship herself. Not allowed to send out of date information. Equasis is a government supported site, that makes the argument stronger. Last but not least:

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2501317

On the stern: Majuro and that leads to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Majuro

The name found in Maritime-Connector might come from the owner:

0232570 Ship manager/Commercial manager KAMBARA KISEN CO LTD 1083, Tsuneishi, Numakuma-cho, Fukuyama-shi, Hiroshima-ken, 720-0396, Japan. since 07/01/2016 detail 1199587 Registered owner CHIJIN SHIPPING SA Care of Kambara Kisen Co Ltd , 1083, Tsuneishi, Numakuma-cho, Fukuyama-shi, Hiroshima-ken, 720-0396, Japan. since 07/01/2016 detail

Is this where you were looking for? --Stunteltje (talk) 08:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Yes and no. I was hoping you could have a look and check if I missed something in creating the categories. You are the ship expert.   --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:44, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
I missed Category:Ships of ...... by country, so that is what attracted my attention. I'll add Category:Ships of the Marshall Islands now. By the way, I am no expert, just own a barge. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help! Owning a barge makes you more of an expert than me. I only own a rubber duck. And three life vests are collecting dust in the garage.. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Non-empty redirected categoriesEdit

Hi :-)

1) You are still creating non-empty redirected categories, such as:
Empty them, please.
  Done Did not realise that categories were left in renaming process. Just transferred files.
2) I think a category name "F830 Hr.Ms. Tjerk Hiddes (ship, 1993)" is not correct: it should be comma there: "Hr. Ms.", isn't it?
Have a nice day :-) Wieralee (talk) 18:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
The naming is correct, as Hr.Ms. and Zr.Ms. (Her and His Majesty in Dutch) are part of the names of naval vessels, as long as they have a commanding officer from the Royal Dutch Navy. The same system as HMS British naval ships have. Thank you very much for your attention. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:02, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Category:Military_of_the_BahamasEdit

Geo Swan (talk) 01:02, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Category:M909_Bovesse_(ship,_1957)Edit

2A02:A03F:607F:C500:AA:49A:7A4D:DF5D 14:09, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:ENI 02331761 ALIE-JAN (01).JPGEdit

Copyright status: File:ENI 02331761 ALIE-JAN (01).JPG

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | ಕನ್ನಡ | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | ತುಳು | українська | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ENI 02331761 ALIE-JAN (01).JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

No license nominatiesEdit

Hoi, dit kleine syntax foutje trok de aandacht van onze systemen. Jcb (talk) 17:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Met dank. Kennelijk misgegaan toen ik op een andere computer Commonnist installeerde. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Batavia 03.JPG en File:Batavia 02.JPGEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, bedankt voor het recente aanpassen. Moeten deze files ook hernoemd worden? Klaarblijkelijk heeft men het op de nl.wikipedia nog steeds niet door. Een afbeelding zegt meer dan duizend woorden. Het zijn nu net de foutieve gegevens hier en overal waar ik ze tegen het virtuele lijf loop, die ik in de kijker wil zetten zodat diegenen die er wél verstand van hebben... als het ware met de neus op de feiten worden gedrukt. Het krioelt nog (jammer genoeg) van de foutieve informatie in de encyclopedie. Die eruit halen is een titanenwerk. Maar, I keep going en all hands on deck zou ik zeggen.   Lotje (talk) 08:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

De foto's betreffen kennelijk de Batavia, die nu even tijdelijk als "Nieuw Hoorn" in de vaart was, zoals blijkt uit naam op de spiegel. Dat komt wel meer voor, als schepen onder charter varen doen ze dat nogal eens onder een andere naam. Ik heb dat opgevangen door onder de nieuwe naam een andere category aan te maken. Maar dat maakt het schip nog steeds geen replica van de Nieuw Hoorn, het is een op het oog nagebouwd schip met veel kenmerken van een schip uit die tijd. Niet meer en niet minder. Dus de naam van de afbeeldingen kan beter, ik heb er niet aan geknutseld omdat het via de category al terug te vinden is. Maar "Replica van de Nieuwe Hoorn" is dus geen juiste naam. Ik zal het nu ook aanpassen. --Stunteltje (talk) 12:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Category:Vertrouwen (ship, 1910)Edit

Hallo Stunteltje, net maakte ik de datalink naar Vertrouwen, blijkt nu echter dat het bij de afbeelding op de sv.wikipedia de Category:Vertrouwen (ship, 1954) zou betreffen. Weet jij hier raad mee? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 12:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Weinig. Als ik de tweede link volg kom ik bij een foto van een klipper Vertrouwen. De foto in Commons geeft ook een klipper. Maar bij de Scheepsmetingsdienst vind ik bij die werf nergens een schip van die lengte en al helemaal niet in dat jaar 1910 gebouwd. Er zijn heel veel Vertrouwens in de vaart (geweest), dus zonder aanvullende gegevens kan ik er niets mee. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

ENI-nummerEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, only me again! Op dit lemma staat geen enkele afbeelding waarop het ENI-nummer duidelijk zichtbaar is. Dank je dat deze afbeelding geschikt is om er bovenaan te plaatsen? Lotje (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Er staan al twee schepen met een duidelijk ENI-nummer. Het zou dus best kunnen, maar er zijn ook heel veel andere tankers mogelijk. Die gebruiken zo'n bord vaak. Mijn plaatjes waar een ENI-nummer op voorkomt schiet ik altijd om thuis het schip snel te kunnen vinden en de gegevens te kunnen controleren. --Stunteltje (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

Schooner Touch-Me-NotEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, zegt jou dit iets? :)

Als ik dit volg: schooner ZOE TREFFRY ... TOUCH ME NOT TORFREY, 443/1900, Fowey No.4 SS Co, Fowey-reg (L/Lr) detained on river Elbe outbreak ww1 1919 transferred to Guernsey register. 1930 renamed YORKRIVER and transferred to London register. 167'9 x25'1 x 9'4 steel kom ik uit op ZOE TREFFRY 19277 schooner Sunderland G. W. & W. J. Hall 1857 71 1868 E.J.Treffry, Place Fowey 1870 Samuel Moss Par1876 Joseph Thomas Treffry, 1880 Samuel Moss, Par 1861 census 1871 census, en dan zou het een vissende schoener uit 1857 kunnen zijn, maar ik heb geen idee of dat overeenkomt. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:13, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

BengkalisEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, dit zijn, meen ik, 1, 2 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 afbeeldingen m.b.t. het Gouvernementsmarineschip Bengkalis. Kan je daar iets mee aanvangen? Lotje (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


Category:Bremerhaven (tugboat, 1993) vs. Category:VB Bremerhaven (tugboat, 1993)Edit

Hi Stunteltje, could you please check these categories? I think they're for the same tugboat and should be merged. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

It is the same ship, but with a different name and the categories are not to be merged. The coupling is via Category:IMO 9045871. Different names for ships result in different categories. Many ships get another name, the IMO number stays the same for the ship. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

File:MS FLUKS (01).JPGEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, heb jij er enig idee van waar in Leeuwarden dit kan zijn? Ik zou graag de afbeelding fine-tuning. Thank you for your time. :) Lotje (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Ik heb mijn journaals er op nageslagen en het moet in het Somerrak zijn geweest. Het vervelende is dat ik op de satellietbeelden daar geen woonschepen meer zie, in 2011 lagen ze er op rij. Ik ben toen rondgelopen en heb van alle schepen foto's gemaakt. Ik zie nu dat ik er nog veel kan uploaden. Zal ik een dezer dagen proberen en dan zie je meer huizen in de omgeving. Ik denk dat je voor je oriëntatie wel iets hebt aan deze foto. Daar zie je het grote gebouw op de achtergrond en dat is herkenbaar. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:17, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Category:Atlas_(ship)Edit

Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Years of completion found, categories renamed, problem solved. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Schip LydiaEdit

Hallo Stunteltje,

Ik heb wat informatie toegevoegd aan File:Busy shiptraffic at the Amsterdam-Rhine canal at Houten Schalkwijk - panoramio.jpg, maar omdat ik geen deskundige ben, vind ik het prettig als er iemand meekijkt. In het bijzonder het schip op de voorgrond: ziet jouw kennersoog daar ook de Lydia uit 1967? Of toch eerder een gelijknamig vaartuig? — bertux 16:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Geen kennersoog, maar gewoon waarnemen. Er staat een box voor de roef en die is ook goed herkenbaar hier op de foto uit 2007. Prima gedaan! --Stunteltje (talk) 21:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Stunteltje,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Ships_by_nameEdit

De728631 (talk) 12:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

I notice that there are now, in "Categories by name (flat list)" 95 sub categories from 1 in a little over a week. Only one of these is named "flat list" in brackets. This creation of "Category:Ships by name (flat list)" solves nothing, in fact its added a level, which I assume is the last thing we want. I don't know about you, but I'm fed up by being railroaded in this manner on like topics, by people gaming the system bulldozing through unwanted changes. This is a major cat and a heavily used one, we don't need its name to be lengthened, it needs to be as short as possible.. Broichmore (talk) 09:53, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Agreed. But you have to address administrator User:Themightyquill, who did the work. --Stunteltje (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Have done. The debate is getting silly now. He's not for compromising and unable to logically justify what his changes. He's not even a player in "Ships" either, which makes this annoying. How do we end it? --Broichmore (talk) 23:46, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't know. He is administrator and has more privileges (tools) to push through. I see a lot of new categories upkoming in Category:Ships by name and have no intention to move them myself to the "flat list" category. So I think that move to a flat list wasn't a good idea. Obviously a lot of users misses it. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:44, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
I have returned to Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/10/Category:Ships by name (flat list). I would be grateful for your weight in backing me up here. This guy might be an Admin, but this intervention is destructive and misguided. He has shown no interest in shipping before, it's just interference he's running here, and out of hubris won't let it go... --Broichmore (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Our interfering Admin is studiously ignoring us and consensus, in the hope this is going to go away. Well he's wrong. I've uploaded a ship to our cat and await him taking it it out and placing it elsewhere. Can we now reverse his actions and restore Ships_by_name with its sub cats? -Broichmore (talk) 06:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
I already discussed it at User talk:Themightyquill. --Stunteltje (talk) 06:56, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
On the 24th of October he moved 38 Ships cats from "Ships by name" to his flat list. Not all are mine, I doubt 10 at the most. [See here]Broichmore (talk) 05:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I asked a Dutch moderator to have a look. Unfortunately he also has problems with this administrator.--Stunteltje (talk) 06:56, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
I have asked around for a Moderator myself and await reply. This may have to be taken to the "Commons:Administrators' noticeboard", unless common sense prevails. This is difficult for me as I'm in Thailand till 3rd week January, and internet connection is problematic at best. -Broichmore (talk) 02:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
The debate Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/10/Category:Ships by name (flat list) has entered a new phase. I would appreciate to hear your current views there. Somehow we need to also invite Huntster, and Rmhermen to put in their pounds worth too. You do realize that all these changes are being proposed by people with no previous experience in "Ships" as such., and their voices are drowning me out. Best regards. - Broichmore (talk) 06:30, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Have to go out. Will look to it --Stunteltje (talk) 06:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Oceanco_Y712_(ship,_2017)Edit

Gillfoto 22:25, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Ships_of_Holland_America_LineEdit

Gillfoto 18:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

Discussion on WikipediaEdit

Hi, yet again there is a discussion on Wikipedia on the subject of naming ship articles and by extension ship categories. Can you please join in. I feel it's important that both Wikipedia and Commons sing from the same hymn sheet on this matter . Link: en: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships#SS Mary Luckenbach (1918). As a separate issue I feel we need our own Commons Talk page; or even better amalgamate it with the Wikipedia one... Your thoughts appreciated. Regards. Broichmore (talk) 19:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Juist_(ship,_1993)Edit

129.13.72.197 08:56, 29 March 2019 (UTC)


Category:Fiducia (ship, 1965)Edit

Hi Stunteltje, I recently took images of this ship and saw that its ENI number is 04009830 (not 04503100 as categorized by you). Please check and compare to https://www.binnenschifferforum.de:7081/showthread.php?8868-Fiducia-GMS-04009830/page1. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 20:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Have a look here on nr. 4, click on the camera symbol and find the second image in the series. The windows in that schip confirm the windows of the vessel on the Rhine. The windows from the ship as found in the Binnenschifferforum ar sqare windows. So I assume it is one of the at least other 20 Fiducia's. [7]. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:40, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Category:Dordrechts Museum aan de HavenEdit

Beste Stunteltje,

Je werkte destijds aan deze categorie, weet je waarom deze "Dordrechts Museum aan de Haven" heet? Heeft iets te maken met Huis de Gijn? Bij het museum zelf en Rijksmonumenten vind ik deze lange benaming niet, te wijzigen tot "Dordrechts Museum"? Welbedankt, Hansmuller (talk) 10:20, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Geen idee. Ik heb niet meer gedaan dan in de category naar Dordrecht te verwijzen. Als je een betere naam hebt, ga je gang. Jouw suggestie komt overeen met hun homepage. --Stunteltje (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:HD54 Oberon (ship, 1884)Edit

Hallo Stunteltje, wil je eens naar de category kijken? Er schot iets aan {{nl:HD 54 "Oberon". Greets Lotje (talk) 10:06, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Inderdaad. Een : waar een | had moeten staan. Nu verbeterd.--Stunteltje (talk) 20:57, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-2_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 08:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-21_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 14:52, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-3_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-4_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-22_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Category:LST-31_Addison_County_(ship,_1943)Edit

Robby (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Askold (ship, 1900)Edit

I'm not convinced that the image in the center of this page is the Askold (ship, 1900). Can you please take a look? Broichmore (talk) 17:32, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

I think you are right. It looks more the Tsesarevich (ship, 1900). --Stunteltje (talk) 18:37, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Can you translate the caption under the image? Broichmore (talk) 22:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
I think the caption says Russian battleship Tsesarevich too, I arrived at that after studying the Gothic Alphabet, but it sure was painful. Are we agreed? Our articles seem to bear this out as the Tsesarevich was damaged and the Askold not. Broichmore (talk) 12:06, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

File:TSMS Lakonia.JPGEdit

 
File:TSMS Lakonia.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jcb (talk) 11:38, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Education_in_the_Netherlands_by_cityEdit

WhisperToMe (talk) 14:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata:Project chatEdit

There is a discussion on "Wikidata:Project chat" about the Wikidata Infobox as seen at Commons ship categories. Can you please look at it and give your opinions and corrections. I would be grateful for that before I make another push for some positive action to be made on it. See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Ships Broichmore (talk) 09:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)


Ships of the Blue Star LineEdit

BevinKacon (talk) 12:20, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:O'Mega_(ship,_1985)Edit

112.205.148.142 08:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Template for the ENIEdit

Hello Stunteltje, regarding your recent changes of ENI categories, I have another idea. The European Number of Identification has the same signification as the IMO number. From my point of view it should be useful, to initiate a template for ENIcats like the Template:IMOcat. Such template could also replace the bad category «Vessels by ENI number», long title «Vessels by European Number of Identification number» with a double word. Groets --Ein Dahmer (talk) 15:54, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

A very good idea. The long version, I wonder. Because everyone in the European inland waterway business uses just the ENI term. If it can be done by bot, OK. But then we also have to change to the long version of the IMO number.
By the way, I follow your way of working now by putting the categories ships built by year to the IMO categories. Not the ships by country, as sold ships can have different home ports in different countries. Perhaps the categories of ships by country have to be moved to the homeport categories.--Stunteltje (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
The first step is done, see Template:ENIcat. A Template:ENI (analogous to Template:IMO) is already ordered. Groets --Ein Dahmer (talk) 19:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Very good!! Now another image for the vessel e.g.   or  .--Stunteltje (talk) 21:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file moversEdit

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

A850?Edit

Dag Stunteltje, ter informatie en wat deze bewerking betreft: dat moet een vergissing zijn. Hoe kan een filmpje dat in 1979 is gemaakt een schip laten zien dat in 1989 werd gebouwd? In het filmpje zelf lijkt het om de A891 Soemba te gaan, een schip uit de Floresklasse. Groet, Wutsje 19:24, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Je hebt volstrekt gelijk. Gewoon geblunderd indertijd. Met mijn dank voor het opmerken. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Category:NDSMEdit

JopkeB (talk) 04:55, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

IJstroomEdit

Dag Stunteltje, enig idee welke IJstroom te zien is in File:Zeeschip door het Winschoterdiep-515461.ogv? Groet, Wutsje 23:13, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Volgens mij de IJstroom (ship, 1950), zie de bron bij het IMO nummer. --Stunteltje (talk) 09:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Dank! Wutsje 13:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Nog twee vragenEdit

Dag Stunteltje, daar was ik alweer. Weet je ook om welke Rian het gaat op File:Mislukte tewaterlating van de "Rian".webm

Zie Rian (ship, 1948)

en welke Magna Pete wordt getoond in File:'Magna Pete' tewatergelaten-511502.ogv en File:'Magna Pete' tewatergelaten-Launching of the 'Magna Pete'-511502.webm? Groet, Wutsje 05:11, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Zie Magna Pete (ship, 1948) --Stunteltje (talk) 10:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Ook dank! Wutsje 13:55, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Presidente JuscelinoEdit

Dag Stunteltje, de bestanden File:Supertanker Presidente Juscelino op de helling bij Verolme, Bestanddeelnr 909-8962.jpg, File:Precisie tewaterlating van reuzentanker-525763.ogv en File:Technische proefvaart van supertanker op de Noordzee-517794.ogv horen bij elkaar, maar het aanmaken van een categorie wilde ik maar aan jou overlaten. Ik heb er geen andere plaatjes of filmpjes van gevonden. Groet, Wutsje 16:57, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Aanvulling: als ik het goed heb, gaat het hier om IMO 5284211. Wutsje 17:07, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Helemaal goed.   Done Zie Category:Presidente Juscelino (ship, 1959) en ook bij het IMO nummer.--Stunteltje (talk) 21:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

Proefvaarten en scheepstewaterlatingenEdit

Ter informatie: nog meer niet specifiek gecategoriseerde Polygoonjournaals over scheepstewaterlatingen en proefvaarten:

Groet, Wutsje 17:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

  Done --Stunteltje (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
Wederom dank! Wutsje 17:46, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Nog drieEdit

Van Niestern in Delfzijl:

Groet, Wutsje 03:30, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

  Done --Stunteltje (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

LionEdit

You created a new category and marked the old name for deletion. I don't have an opinion about the right name for the category, but what you were doing creates linkrot: what you did is appropriate in the case of newly created categories with typos in the names, and in the case of duplicate categories, but never when there's a longstanding category that you wish to move due to naming conventions. Nyttend (talk) 11:44, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not realise the problems I created, being a simple user. What I did is answering by doing the question asked by the template placed by another user, completed by adding new categories and correcting the category of the year of built. What is left now is the question of a new tresferring of the category to the category I created. Is that possible? --Stunteltje (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Mosques_in_the_HagueEdit

51.37.66.61 16:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Category:Prinz Eitel Friedrich (ship, 1904)Edit

Stunteltje, eeuwige toeverlaat, gestuntel van mijnentwege, en daarom vraag ik je om hulp. Kan je eens dubbelchecken? Thnks. :-) Lotje (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Nou, nou, teveel eer. Met je aanpassing is niets mis. Het probleem hier zit eigenlijk in de bestanden. Bij moderne schepen is het gemakkelijk, die hebben een IMO-nummer en kan je ze op verschillende namen, maar met hetzelfde IMO-nummer, categoriseren. Dat kan hier niet, terwijl het om hetzelfde schip met drie namen gaat. Je zou die met verschillende namen Category:USS DeKalb (ship, 1914) en Category:Mount Clay (ship, 1904) in Category:Prinz Eitel Friedrich (ship, 1904) kunnen onderbrengen. Maar omdat we nog niet voor elkaar kregen dat het jaartal van indienststelling bij USS schepen wordt gebruikt kan dat dus ook Category:USS DeKalb (ID-3010) zijn. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:32, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
Okay, fijn bedankt Stunteltje de creatie van dergelijke categories laat ik liever aan jou over. :-) Lotje (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

I need some helpEdit

Moin Stunteltje, in de:Wiki haben wir Artikel zu Schleusen wie [8]] + [9]. Die Category:Lock gates bietet ein heilloses Durcheinander von sehr verschiedenen Typen von Schleusentoren und anderen Toren. Ich würde das gerne sortieren. Meine Frage daher, wie nennt man ein Stemmtor und ein Klapptor richtig und offiziell in der englischen Sprache? Vielleicht kennst Du einen Muttersprachler der vom Fach ist? Grüße -- Biberbaer (talk) 21:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Leiter kann ich Sie nicht helfen. Niederländisch: puntdeuren und roldeuren. Ich suche in mein kontakten, aber es kann dauern.--Stunteltje (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
Moin und bedankt. Grüße -- Biberbaer (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Same ship?Edit

Dag Stunteltje, please have a look to the Category:VD-172, Jonge Hendrik (ship, 1904) and Category:VD172 De Jonge Hendrik (ship, 1904). From my point of view it seems to be the same ship. Groet --Ein Dahmer (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

I think so too. The right name is "De Jonge Jacob" as per Stichting Stamboek Ronde en Platbodemjachten and Register Varend Erfgoed Nederland. By the way: nice job you are doing. I preferred Category:Fishing vessels of the Netherlands by license number, but it is better to stay in line with the other ‎national categories. --Stunteltje (talk) 07:01, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Bedankt, but De Jonge Hendrik (instead of De Jonge Jacob) should be the right one. --Ein Dahmer (talk) 08:29, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
You are right again. :=)) --Stunteltje (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Hr.Ms. Bellatrix (ship, 1915)Edit

Have a look at this image, do you think this is a Netherlands ship, rather than French? Broichmore (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I think it is not Hr.Ms. Bellatrix, built in 1915, but the French Arabis-class sloop Bellatrix, built by Henderson, launched 29 May 1916. Deleted 1933. Look at the caps with a ball. (Red, in my memory of sailors in Rotterdam.) --Stunteltje (talk) 20:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
I agree with you, but i've not been able to get a date for the Frenchman, apparently she was in Sydney first in December 1929. Once I have that I'll fix the files. can you help with build details? Regards Broichmore (talk) 21:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
From the English Wikipedia: Six vessels were ordered in January 1916, and another two in September 1916, all to this design from British shipyards for the French Navy, and all were delivered to the French in 1916 or (the last pair) 1917: Bellatrix, built by Henderson, launched 29 May 1916. Deleted 1933.--Stunteltje (talk) 21:45, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, i saw it and didn't think it woulld be that easy. LOL Broichmore (talk) 21:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Dubbele categorieEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, ik kom ergens niet helemaal uit. Ik vermoed dat dit dezelfde boot betreft: [10] en [11]. Ook zijn de bouwjaar en lengte me dan niet helemaal duidelijk. Ben benieuwd naar je inzicht. Met vriendelijke groeten, Rudolphous (talk) 06:55, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Je hebt helemaal gelijk, er is maar 1 loodsboot op dit moment met die naam in het Rotterdamse, voor zover ik weet. Indertijd heb ik 1997 gebruikt volgens [12], de lokale bron. Maar achteraf zie ik dat internationaal 1998 wordt gebruikt. [13] & [14] & [15]. Maar ook [16] en die haalt z'n gegevens van de AIS, is dus meestal wel correct, hoewel dat in dit geval niet zo hoeft te zijn. Het bouwjaar is niet iets wat je in je AIS programmeert. Ik ga nog wel even informeren bij de loodsen wat juist is. Lokaal zou de beste informatie moeten geven, maar dat is niet altijd zo. Ik kan regelmatig foutjes doorgeven aan De Binnenvaart, die dan meestal gelijk worden verwerkt.--Stunteltje (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Oke, bedankt voor de geboden helderheid. Ik heb inmiddels het 1998 artikel laten wijzen naar 1997. Ook omdat het 1997 artikel eerder bestond. Rudolphous (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Port of RotterdamEdit

Hallo Stunteltje, ik heb de jaar in Port of Rotterdam wat aangevuld. Inmiddels staan er 10.214 photo's. Rudolphous (talk) 14:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Op zich prachtig, zeg ik als geboren Rotterdammer. Hopelijk staan alle daar in opgenomen schepen in een eigen category. Ik besteed zelf daar de meeste aandacht aan en de laatste tijd levert dat heel wat nieuwe schepen op. De foto's kunnen nog niet vaak in artikelen worden opgenomen. Helaas vindt men in de Nederlandse Wikipedia een schip niet snel encyclopediewaardig en moet voor een artikel vaak worden gewacht tot er een ramp mee met zo'n schip gebeurd is. Of het moet mensen kunnen doodschieten, dan is het wel E. Helaas. Ik beperk me dan ook meestal maar tot het beschrijven van het varend erfgoed, binnenschepen van 50 jaar en ouder. Als er tenminste wat details van bekend zijn. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
50 jaar en ouder voorkomt in ieder geval een hoop discussie. Nog bedankt voor de schip categorisaties. Rudolphous (talk) 07:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Graag gedaan. Als je daar een tool voor hebt kan je zien hoeveel schepen ik al onder naam in een category heb gezet. Ik volg de Category:Ships al vele jaren en probeer hem zo leeg mogelijk te houden.--Stunteltje (talk) 17:29, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Je bedoelt Category:Ships by name (flat list) maar dan het aantal artikelen gesorteerd per aanmaker? Rudolphous (talk) 19:59, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Ja, zoiets. Ik had zelf het wellicht hovaardige idee dat ik wel eens aan de 10.000 zou kunnen zitten. Doe het al zo lang. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Ik kan dit wel voor je uitzoeken - kost wat programmeerwerk. Rudolphous (talk) 18:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Leuk!! Als je dat zelf ook aardig vindt om te doen. Misschien vinden wel meer mensen het leuk om zoiets een keer te weten. En zoiets heeft nooit haast. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:43, 30 May 2020 (UTC)