Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sumitsurai!

-- 07:16, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Commons:Categories and please avoid "over-categorization"Edit

Hi, as being tagged {categorize} see p.e. that one and some more files. Please also check Commons:categories and avoid "over-categorization". Best regards, Roland zh (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪-এ আপনি আমন্ত্রিতEdit

সুধী, বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়ার দশ বছর পূর্তি উদযাপনের অংশ হিসেবে কমন্সে বাংলা উইকিপিডিয়া ফটোগ্রাফি কনটেস্ট-২০১৪ শুরু হতে যাচ্ছে। এটি শুরু হবে ১লা সেপ্টেম্বর ২০১৪ তারিখে এবং শেষ হবে ৩১শে অক্টোবর ২০১৪ তারিখে। এই ফটোগ্রাফি প্রতিযোগিতায় অংশগ্রহনের জন্য আপনাকে আমন্ত্রন জানাচ্ছি।

Welcome to Wiki Loves Food (WLF) photo competitionEdit

Hi Sumitsurai,
Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is a public photo competition organized by Wikimedia India Chapter on Wikimedia Commons for use on Wikipedia and other project websites of the Wikimedia Foundation. The goal of this project is to improve the quality of pictures of different cuisines of India & the world. For more information regarding the Rules, Eligibility, Prize and other related issues, please visit https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Food. The category for this photo competition is “Wiki Loves Food”. You can also visit our Facebook page here https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesFood?fref=ts.

The images for Phase I should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons during 15th April 2015 and 30th April 2015. It doesn’t matter when you have captured the photo, only that you upload it after 00:00 IST on 15th April 2015 and before the final deadline of 23:59 IST on 30th April 2015. Similarly for Phase II, The submission starts after 00.00 IST on 1st May 2015 and ends at 11.59 IST on 1ST June 2015.

Thank you,
The Wiki Loves Food Team

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lalji Temple - Kalna - Idol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
- I give you weak support for promotion to QI for this one. There are focus problems in this photo, too, but I consider the idols themselves sufficiently in focus, and it's a good composition. However, I'd welcome for anyone who disagrees to take this to Consensual Review for a discussion and majority vote. -- Ikan Kekek 06:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Mass deletionsEdit

Hello Sumitsurai,

for mass deletions like files from user:Stanley das794 please use Visual File Change. „It saves considerable time both for you and for the closing Admin“ (User:Jameslwoodward) --Hystrix (talk) 18:54, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiki-voyage-header-omkareshwar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pancharantna Temple - Kalna - Temple 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:45, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gas Balloon at Jal Mahotsav - Hanuwantiya, Madhya Pradesh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Good, but please add proper categories. --Halavar 15:24, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
  Done Sorry! Have updated the relevant categories now. Thank you! --Sumitsurai 19:10, 23 January 2017 (UTC)   Support Good quality. --Milseburg 13:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamondas Mookerjee Kalibari Capital Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 15:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chitteswari Temple Durga Idol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bamondas Mookerjee Kalibari Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 14:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 10:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Beautiful photo, but what are the blue streaks near the upper left corner? If you fix those, I'd seriously consider nominating this for FP, or you could. -- Ikan Kekek 11:37, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing it out Ikan Kekek. I could locate two streaks, removed them and re uploaded the image. --Sumit Surai 18:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 00:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Descriptions at QICEdit

Hi there! It is great that you nominate photos by other users for QIC, but please do not include such long descriptions as you do on the nominations. I know that when you use the QIC nom tool, it copies the entire text from the file's description, but you have to replace that with a much shorter description in your own words. This can be done either in the small box you get when you click on the "Nominate this file for QI" or in the editing window when you have entered your nominations at QIC. Having the full description in the "frame" is not at all necessary since the reviewers read it on the file's page and we try not to clutter the page needlessly. All the best, --cart-Talk 18:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

  • Thanks cart for the advice. Yes, it was the default QIC nom tool structure that I was using. Will be editing it to the required minimum in the future. --Sumit Surai (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:River Narmada from Maheshwar Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tingmo.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted'
Congratulations! The
image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aloo Chaat, Alu Kabli'
.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2016 Durga Puja Kolkata Shobhabazar Sarbojonin (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Some noise, but IMO just acceptable --A.Savin 16:17, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pancharatna Temple - Royal Quarters - Garh Panchakot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 11:16, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello Sumitsurai, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kankali Mata Temple, Garh Panchakot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:44, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trail To Ramitey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. You should give more location informations. --MirandaAdramin 13:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)   Comment Thanks MirandaAdramin. More details are in the photo details page. Didn't include all details here as was asked earlier to keep it short here. --Sumitsurai 07:28, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gnathang Gadenchoeling Gumpa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Sixflashphoto 19:21, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Plain, but QI. --Crisco 1492 03:25, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and a familiar street I've never been on.--RaboKarbakian 15:48, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goblet of Fire Cocktail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Striking and well-done, IMO, although the photo is small. -- Ikan Kekek 18:22, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grave of Elizabeth May, Dutch Cemetery, Chinsurah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:46, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dutch Cemetery Chinsurah - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality of this detail photo high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 21:58, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 15:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chharrah - Amlaka - I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment - The amalaka itself is OK, IMO, though the whites to its left might be blown. However, I don't think the photo is that useful without a file description. Could you please put a description on the "Description" line of your file page? -- Ikan Kekek 15:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
  Done Sorry, have added the description. --Sumitsurai 08:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks.   Support - OK for me. -- Ikan Kekek 12:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chharrah - Amlaka - II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 12:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid - Prayer Hall (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:17, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid - Prayer Hall (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 22:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 22:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:56, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Para Stone Deul Remaining Works (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafiz Jamaluddin Mosque - Mihrab (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me but it's a pity for the noise. Further, I would crop a bit of the left border to the arch centered and apply a slight horizontal correction to straighten the horizontal lines. --Basotxerri 17:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafiz Jamaluddin Mosque - Mihrab (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Just ok (due to noise) --Poco a poco 18:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nakhoda Masjid (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Can you increase the exposure a bit? (ie at least File:Trougnouf's sandbox 2.jpg) --Trougnouf 22:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded with increased exposure. Could you please check? Thank you. --Sumitsurai 14:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)   Support Good quality, thank you. --Trougnouf 15:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Iceland - a requestEdit

We have change the Time, the meeting is in August, 22.-25. The time to organise the money and event was too small, sorry. Can you support me at the conference program? Can you enter your name at the organisation team? --Ralf Roleček 17:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwich Cathedral West Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 01:04, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tudor Chimney.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:52, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Transept - Abbey of St. Edmund.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Bgag 01:12, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christchurch Mansion - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 21:07, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christchurch Park War Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, though 1/350s seems unnecessary for a static structure at 28mm, you could have gone with a slower shutter speed and lower ISO hence higher quality. --Trougnouf 22:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldest Building - Valley Farm - Flatford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Norwich Cathedral Spire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:09, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Sumitsurai,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haraktore - Stone idols preserved inside a temple (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 21:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broken Part Of Old Temple - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:37, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damaged Idol Of Old Temple I - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 17:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damaged Panels Of Old Temple - Krosjuri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 12:17, 14 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2018Edit

Hallo Sumit Surai, thank you for the honour to propose me as a judge in the upcoming Wiki Loves Monuments, India 2018. I must tell you that I have no idea, what I have to do as judge, and also, how many time it will take. At the moment I still have a "normal" profession (next year in May I will be retired and I hope I will have more time for Wikimedia). Also my family needs some time. Working for Wikimedia is only a hobby. So I can't work every day for a certain time in Wikimedia, sometimes i must also pause for some days (so I can't bei online every day). Can you please inform me, what I have to do, how long it will last (only september?) and how much time I will need per day and if it is also possible to pause for one or severeal days? Sincerely --Llez (talk) 13:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Hi Sumit Surai, I accept. It is a honour and a challenge for me. I never worked a judge and never with Montage, but I'm shure you will help me if there are questions (and I suppose there will be more than one). To a good cooperation. --Llez (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saanen Mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saanen Railway Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 15:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kirche Saanen Interior west wall and north wall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Tavel Door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Shadows are too dark. Maybe you can fis that. --Ermell 06:40, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
Ermell, have updated with new version. Could you please check if it is ok now? --Sumitsurai 11:19, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:28, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3-5 Silent street, Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 14:36, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipswich School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:22, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saanen Church Fresco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Better than it could have been --Daniel Case 16:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greyfriars Bobby Memorial Fountain - Edinburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 13:29, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Congregational Church - Saltaire - Inside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rbrechko 11:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipswich School Library Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good for me. --Rbrechko 14:46, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Rbrechko 14:12, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellbrunn Palace Statue I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Sharpness just over the bar --Poco a poco 17:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Greyfriars Bobby Statue Edinburgh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue IV.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Same as File:Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue I.jpg --Trougnouf 23:17, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue III.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support I think a slight perspective correction to look like we are in front of the block would be a great improvement, but that's probably not expected for QI (which it is) --Trougnouf 23:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Congregational Church - Saltaire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 23:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gippeswyk Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Nice that you got both the building and the sky right --Daniel Case 17:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Louvre Palace Pyramid.jpgEdit

 
File:Louvre Palace Pyramid.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pierre André (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskapelle Blutenburg Frescoes II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 16:40, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvre Palace Gallery Ceiling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --ArildV 04:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvre Palace North Gate Top.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvre Palace North Gate Top Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvre Palace East Gate Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 23:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskapelle Blutenburg Frescoes I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 09:39, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mirabell Gradens Dwarf Statue V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Statue's fine although some of the background looks a little dewy --Daniel Case 02:19, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Peter Ceiling - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pont Neuf - Paris - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 14:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jewish Memorial - Castle Blutenburg - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 15:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Notre Dame - Paris - France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Looks OK. --Peulle 22:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main Door Panel - Asam Church - Munich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 18:26, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neptune's House and Amphitrite - Ercolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Weak promotion. The sharpness/DoF could be better. f/3.5 is wide open, f/8 or closer would be better. --XRay 05:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Louvre Palace East Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Perspective issues (verticals) need to be fixed --Uoaei1 15:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
  Done--Paris 16 17:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
  Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:19, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomas Wolsey Bust - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! K6 Telephone Kiosk - St Helen Street - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:57, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wooden Panel At Listed Building - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:02, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Margaret's Church - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pompei Quadriportico.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Crop or clone out that stray shadow at bottom center --Daniel Case 01:09, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Cloned out the shadow. Daniel Case could you please check if it is ok now? Thanks --Sumitsurai 15:35, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good now --Daniel Case 02:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2018 India - Third roundEdit

Hallo, Sumitsurai. in the last rounds it was very clear, what I had to do: select the images in the first round and then ranking them in the second round. When I open the third round, I find the images ranked from place 1 to place 58. They are seemingly already ranked. I have no idea what I have to do exactly in the third round and how? I found no instruction or a link to an instruction on the page. Greetings --Llez (talk) 21:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethseda Baptist Church - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Armillary Sphere Sundial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --MB-one 14:38, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Thomas Wolsey - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:21, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodwork at old house - Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Technically good, but I would prefer a tighter crop at the right, there is too much distracting background actually. May be you can crop left of the last car? Greetings --Dirtsc 07:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
  Oppose Not done within a week. --XRay 14:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
  Done Could you please check if it is ok now Dirtsc? Thanks - --Sumitsurai 20:32, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
  Support This version is better balanced, QI imho. Greetings --Dirtsc 12:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Danke!Edit

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war. Aus rund 500 von einer Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger-Fotos dieses Jahres gewählt: Commons:WikiDaheim.

Übrigens: Wikimedia Österreich unterstützt Dich gerne bei Deinen Beiträgen auf Wikimedia Commons, beispielsweise mit Foto-Leihgeräten oder einem Foto-Software-Stipendium. Einen Überblick über die Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten findest Du auf Wikipedia:Förderung.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 18:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christchurch Mansion Clock.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:15, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gippeswyk Hall, Ipswich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Street Factory Marconi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marconi New Street Factory Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ipswich School WWI Memorial Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa dello Scheletro - Ercolano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 14:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Cecilia Stained Glass Felixstowe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support - Not straight-on, but good quality to me. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ethelbert King Kent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Main object is sharp, well done grey sky, but please the object at the right crop --Michielverbeek 20:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cabmans Shelter - Christchurch Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --Johannes Robalotoff 10:22, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baroness Burdett Coutts Drinking Fountain - North West View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 00:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove Inscription.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove At Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:57, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Bridge Stone Alcove - Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 16:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Seacole Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 23:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Aquatics Centre - Olympic Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chinese Pagoda - Victoria Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baroness Burdett Coutts Drinking Fountain - South West View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support A bit dark but good quality. --MB-one 10:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Seacole Statue - Side View.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:43, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea Site Disc Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
You didn't have great light to work with but you did well. Good quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 09:44, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Judging Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019Edit

Hallo Sumitsurai, thanks for the honour to be nominated again for the jury. I have only one problem in the moment: I am in holidays from Septeber 7 to September 22 and I don't know yet, if I will have the opportubity to go online. So it depends, when "Wiki Loves Monuments India 2019" begins. If it starts after September 22, I am pleased be in the jury again. --Llez (talk) 04:43, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

  • Thank you so much Llez for accepting our offer. Our jury rounds will open sometime during the first week of October. So it would not coincide with your holidays. Thanks again - --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:06, 27 August 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019Edit

 
Hallo Sumitsurai,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2019 findet zum neunten Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Dabei können Bau- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Es sind viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu fotografieren. Neben beeindruckenden märchenhaften Schlössern, Burgen und Kirchen können auch andere Kulturdenkmale wie Brücken, Industrieruinen, Bauernhöfe oder Parks fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. In den letzten Jahren sind zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden, die sich über Fotos freuen. Für die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Du bist interessiert, am Wettbewerb mitzuwirken, dir fehlt aber die richtige Technik? Dann wirf doch mal einen Blick in den Technikpool und das Technikleihportal von Wikimedia Deutschland! Dort findest du Kameras, Objektive und Zubehör verschiedenster Art. Sollte noch Technik fehlen, die aber in Zukunft unbedingt benötigt wird, dann freut sich Wikimedia Deutschland über dein Feedback zum Technikpool.

Außerdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Mitte September 2019 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg bei größten Fotowettbewerb wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 14:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!Edit

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!Edit

English | Italiano | +/−


Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

It's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!Edit

Hi Sumitsurai!

You are receiving this message because you have previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in India. We would be very delighted if you would do so again this year, help record our monuments for future generations and win exciting prizes.

You can find more details in this page. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Regards,
Bodhisattwa
(on behalf of Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 in India team)--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019Edit

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8340 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salisbury Cathedral Nave - Ceiling Paintings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stonehenge from the north.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
good enough for QI but a jacket is visible on the right side of the photo, can you fix it?--Armenak Margarian 17:34, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
The stones look greenish --Poco a poco 17:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
  Done Thanks Armenak Margarian and Poco a poco. Have corrected as per suggestions. Is it ok now? --Sumitsurai 14:23, 24 September 2019 (UTC) Good for me--Armenak Margarian 17:02, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments UK 2019!Edit

Hi

Thank you so much for contributing to the UK section of this year's Wiki Loves Monuments contest, which finished yesterday. We really do appreciate the time and effort you've put in to record the UK's built cultural heritage for future generations.

Your contribution has been been added to our collections here on Wikimedia Commons, and is already available for editors to make use of on Wikipedia and elsewhere. It has also been entered into this year's contest. If you'd like to see your own images, just click on the uploads link at the top right of this page (if you don't see it, click on the Log in option first).

We've received over 10,000 UK entries this year, and it will take a few weeks for our volunteers and professional judges to decide on the final top 10. The winners will be announced by the end of this month, both here on Wikimedia Commons and also on the competition website.

The top 10 UK images will go forward to the international section where they will compete against winners from some 50 other countries. The international winners should be announced here in December.

Don't forget, by the way, that if you're hoping to win a prize in the contest it's essential that you have enabled email in your Wikimedia preferences. If you haven't, you're not eligible to win. If you're unsure, please check here.

Once again, many thanks for your help! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salisbury Cathedral Spire - Wiltshire.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --D-Kuru 18:16, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 India - Jury RoundEdit

Hi, I finished the voting of the first round. Greetings --Llez (talk) 10:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. We would let you as know as soon as all the judges complete the round and we create the next. --Sumit Surai (talk) 12:02, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
I began to rank for the second round, but it was not possible to save the ranking made hitherto (Bad Request: must submit all rankings at once. (expected 117 submissions, got 100.) Is it possible to save after a while and then to continue, or must I do the rankig nonstop (i.e. to rank all), befor I can save it? It is not possible to me to do this without interrutpion for I must do it time by time (as in the first round). --Llez (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
PS. Every time I open the voting page, the pictures are arranged in another order.
Thanks for letting me know. Please do not try for the time being. It looks like Montage is unable to handle images more than 100 for ranking. I am checking and getting back to you as soon as possible. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 14:54, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Montage is not supporting more than 100 images for ranking, so I changed it to rating in this round. Really sorry that we would have to do a final ranking round after this. Do let me know if there are any other issues. Thanks --Sumit Surai (talk) 15:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Sumitsurai".