Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tdn70!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:05, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ribe

edit

Hej Thomas. Jeg stødte lige på et af dine billeder. Vi har et stort antal billeder fra Ribe, organiseret bl.a. efter gader (eks. Category:Sønderportsgade) og bygninger (eks Category:Maren Splids Hus), som med fordel kunne bruges til nogle fine wikipedia-artikler i stil med f.eks. da:Kategori:Gader i Indre By (København). Jeg er kommet meget i Ribe og har selv taget en del af de billeder der er på Commons. Jeg har i nogen tid drømt om at få de gamle gader og nogle flere af de fredede huse i Ribe på Wikipedia, men får det vist aldrig gjort alene, da jeg ofte har for travlt med at organisere billeder, bekæmpe hærværk på Wikipedia og meget andet. Derfor vil det være super hvis jeg kunne samle en håndfuld interesserede til et arrangement (et "edit-a-thon"), hvor vi kunne kigge på sagen. --Hjart (talk) 08:40, 19 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hej - du har fat i den helt rigtige mand :-) Jeg har små 10.000 nye og gamle billeder fra Ribe. Postkort og meget andet..... Du finder et link her https://ribebilleder.fotoware.cloud/fotoweb/ til den hjemmeside jeg har i dag, der koster mig 20.000,- kr. årligt og som jeg nu har opsagt. Jeg leder efter et alternativ.

Endvidere har jeg www.ribekron.dk hjemmesiden Kort fortalt har jeg en masse billeder og viden om Ribe, som jeg drømmer om at forene et sted, hvor alle har glæde af det. Men jeg har ikke helt fanget, hvordan dette virker.....

Www.Ribe.nu er også mit domain.

Det kunne jo være en start at skrive de historiske noter ind, som Hans Henrik Engqvist fældede ned i sin Bevaringsplan fra 1969. I'm all in - jeg skal bare ha hjælp til at komme i gang med at forstå, hvordan jeg skal bruge dette rigtigt.

Det ser godt nok ud til at vi har rigeligt med grundlag fpr nogle fine artikler på Wikipedia om Ribes gader og huse mm. Commons er for de fleste ikke så lettilgængeligt og det er kun få der ser billeder mm der, så det er primært bare Wikipedias billedlager. Tricket er at lave artikler i stil med Category:Puggaardsgade (Ribe) (klik på "Wikipedia" under billedet i infoboksen til højre) og Category:Tårnborg (Ribe) (som begge sagtens kan udbygges betragteligt). Jeg vil meget gerne mødes og forsøge at sætte dig ind i mine erfaringer med hvordan man bedst gør det. --Hjart (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ja, jeg har nok brug for, at du sporer mig lidt ind på stilen i forhold til kilder, kopiering og andet. Jeg er stor fortaler af at kopiere og ikke omskrive. Men så til gengæld kreditere den, der har skrevet teksten. Men der er meget forskellige holdninger til den slags. Endvidere kan jeg nok ikke sidde mig ned og skrive en færdig artikel om en gade eller bygning. Min kilder er spredte og jeg har et ønske om løbende at berige en side, når jeg finder nye viden. P.s. Husk jeg har domains, der kan lede søgende på rette vej...

Bemærk at man på Wikipedia er meget opmærksomme på ikke at bryde nogens ophavsret/copyright og at man derfor skal være meget forsigtig med bare at kopiere fra værker af forfattere der ikke har været døde i mindst 70 år. Derfor kan det være nødvendigt som et minimum at omformulere tekster. --Hjart (talk) 17:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Hjart - ved du noget om ribewiki.dk? Det synes som lidt af en rodebutik for mig. Måske jeg skulle bruge mine kræfter der i stedet for? --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 15:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nej, jeg kender ikke så meget til det. Det ser umiddelbart ud til stort set at være et enmandsprojekt. Hvis du klikker på "Seneste ændringer" i sideboksen, kan du se at der p.t. sådan set sker en del, men at der kun er en enkelt bidragsyder. Personligt ville jeg se den slags an et pænt stykke tid inden jeg eventuelt begyndte at bruge krudt på det. --Hjart (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nye kategorier

edit

Du må meget gerne omdøbe/flytte kategorier (se under "mere") oppe til højre istedet for at lave nye. --Hjart (talk) 21:16, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok Hjart - har dog ikke helt fanget den del endnu. Må prøve mig lidt mere frem......

Det er ok. Det tager gerne lige lidt tid at sætte sig ind i nye systemer :-)
Undgå helst at bruge "/" i kategorinavne. Det er af tekniske grunde ikke så heldigt. --Hjart (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
I mange tilfælde er det ligeledes en bedre ide lave en redirect til den gamle kategori (f.eks. Torvet xx -> "Den gamle arrest") --Hjart (talk) 21:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Indtil videre vil jeg meget foretrække at du undlader at omdøbe kategorier. Der er andre måder at angive adresser på. --Hjart (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Det gør jeg :-) Er du opmærksom på, at der både er en kategori, der hedder Category:Listed buildings in Ribe og Category:Buildings in Ribe

Ja, det er jeg. Førstnævnte er til fredede (listed) bygninger som vi jo har en hel del af i Ribe. Den anden til almindelige (ikke-fredede) bygninger.

Det har jeg så rodet rundt i..... - jeg troede du ville have et samlet overblik..... Beklager

Jeg har organiseret billeder på Commons overalt i DK i flere år nu og der gik derfor desværre lidt tid inden det gik op for mig at du måske ikke var helt klar over hvad "listed" betyder. Det beklager jeg meget. Vi bruger så vidt muligt fælles engelske kategorinavne til kategorier der ikke er egentlige navne for sikre at også udenlandske turister har en chance for at finde rundt i dem. --Hjart (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Bemærk at jeg forberedt til oprettelse af infobokse i de fleste kategorier. Når jeg har fået dem oprettet, vil der kunne søges både på adresser og eventuelle navne (og potentielt varianter af disse) på bygninger. --Hjart (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
filnavne med gadenavne (også dem med husnumre), der kan forveksles med gadenavne i andre byer, må du meget gerne afslutte med ", Ribe". Vi har endnu ikke alt for mange gadefotos uden for hovedstaden og Århus, men jeg forudser at det kommer. --Hjart (talk) 18:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lokomotiv-kategorier

edit

Hej Tdn70

Det er ikke nogen god ide at give hvert eneste lokomotiv sin egen kategori. De fleste har kun brug for et billede af typen, ikke et specifikt lokomotiv. Men det bliver nærmest umuligt at finde de gode billeder, hvis de er spredt udover 20-25 kategorier med en eller to billeder i hver. Man bør kun oprette sådanne kategorier, hvis der er mange billeder af et bestemt lokomotiv. Det er for eksempel tilfældet for de lokomotiver, der står på Danmarks Jernbanemuseum eller benyttes til veterantog. Ved tog i almindelig drift er det unødvendigt, for der er det som regel ligegyldigt, om det er det ene eller det andet lokomotiv, der ses på billederne. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 20:58, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Det er jeg ked af, at du synes. Jeg har fået bragt rigtig mange billeder sammen, ved at følge den model.....--Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 21:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC) P.s. De fleste angiver jo netop tognummeret i filen, fordi det er vigtigt. Beklager, men jeg tror du tager fejl.... --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 21:16, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nej, det har faktisk til været til diskussion for nogle år, hvor en IP-bruger gav sig til at oprette kategorier for en masse tyske lokomotiver. De blev slettet igen, fordi det blev fuldstændig uoverskueligt. Det bliver alt for besværligt at finde de gode billeder, hvis man først skal til at rode 10 eller 20 kategorier igennem. Og så længe et lokomotivs nummer fremgår af filnavnet, beskrivelsen eller begge dele, vil man jo nemt kunne finde det med søgefunktionen. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Det beklager jeg - synes det var en fantastisk ide. Og da jeg egentlig bare fulgte den logik, der allerede var startet på, gik jeg i gang..... Men det ene udelukker vel ikke det andet? Hvis jeg tilføjer den oprindelige kategori igen? --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 21:26, 28 January 2021 (UTC) Synes de er genialt at man kan følge udviklingen og brugen af MY 1149 f.eks... --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 21:48, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Postcards

edit

Hello Tdn70, thanks for uploading postcards of Ribe. I was 1997 in Ribe in the youth hostel. Wonderful town. If you want upload more postcards of Ribe take a look at COM:WPPC. Maybe there you found same helpful informations. Best regards. -- sk (talk) 10:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Stefan Kühn - thanks for your message. I have a +500 collection of old Ribe postcards - I will try to remember the WPPC projekt. All the best, Thomas
Thanks! --sk (talk) 16:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Former fishing ships of Denmark

edit

It seems that 'L 68 Janga Bork (ship, 1981)' is stil in use.(source maritime trackers) So why use the 'Former fishing ships of Denmark' category in File:Vissersschuit L68 IJmuiden II.jpg.Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC) Sorry - my bad. But it's not on the officiel danish list of fishing ships..... --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 16:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hotcat

edit

Bemærk at man med fordel kan anvende "Hotcat", når man tilføjer kategorier til billeder (se under indstillinger->gadgets). Det gør det også lidt nemmere for os andre at følge med i hvad du laver. --Hjart (talk) 11:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC) @Hjart - så det du siger er, at det er sværere at følge med i, når jeg går direkte i koden og ændrer? På forhånd tak, --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 11:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Det gør dels arbejdet væsentligt nemmere for dig (fordi du ikke behøver gå ind i kildekoden) og også nemmere for andre at følge med. Personligt er jeg altid interesseret i at vide hvad andre laver af ændringer på billeder jeg har uploadet. Se f.eks. historikken på Augustenborg Slot. --Hjart (talk) 11:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Copyright status: File:Skibbroen 1937.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Skibbroen 1937.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 09:27, 11 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Ophavsmand?

edit

Det er dig der har taget File:Grenaa_Harbour.jpg? Grunden til at jeg spørger er at du har angivet Grenaa Havn som "ophavsmand" (fotograf). --Hjart (talk) 11:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hvor?

edit

Hvor har du fundet File:Mindesten for Overlæge Peter Nielsen.jpg? --Hjart (talk) 12:00, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hej @Hjart - den står mellem det gamle Sygehus og Åhaven, 55.326740, 8.777816 Mvh. --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 12:58, 16 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:DSB_MR/MRD

edit
 

Category:DSB_MR/MRD has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Mef.ellingen (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Billeder per år per by

edit

Bemærk venligst at når du lægger 1-2 billeder i hver kategori, gør du det helt unødvendigt besværligt at danne sig et overblik over hvad der er af billeder i f.eks. Hirtshals. Med så få billeder i hver kategori, vil jeg stærkt anbefale at du i stedet laver en kategori per århundrede eller hvis der er mange nok, per årti. --Hjart (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Hjart - jeg følger egentlig bare den samme logik, som der følges de fleste steder. I mit hoved giver det meget mere mening og overblik - men ting opfattes jo forskelligt. De byer, der har mange byer, kører helt ned på år/måned. Måske det er Hirtshals om 10 år! Fortsat god aften --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 17:38, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bemærk venligst at de fleste af os kun laver nye kategorier af den art når der er tilstrækkelig mange billeder at fylde i dem. I byer hvor der er rigtig mange billeder kan det hjælpe på overblikket at organisere billederne per enkeltår (I de år hvor der vitterligt er mange billeder). I byer hvor vi kun har ganske få billeder hjælper det på ingen måde på overblikket. --Hjart (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Hjart - hvis jeg gerne ville finde nogle aktuelle billeder fra Hirtshals - synes jeg da ikke det vil være specielt fedt at skulle kigge på et foto fra 2011 af en bygning. Måske bygningen ikke engang er der mere..... Min tankegang er lidt, at de billeder, der virkelig viser noget aktuelt og relevant - uanset dato, skal vises på forsiden. Her vil min prioritet være relevans over overblik. Billeder af et forulykket fly fra 1989, siger i mit hovedet heller ikke så meget om Hirtshals. Men det opfattes jo forskelligt.... Du ruller bare tilbage, hvis du ikke er enig. God aften --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 17:55, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Et foto fra 2011 kan sagtens stadig være værdifuldt, specielt hvis det er det eneste vi har af lige den bygning. Og en bygning der er fotograferet i 2011 står højst sandsynligt stadigvæk. Hvis ikke kan det være meningsfuldt at flytte den til "destroyed buildings in X". At placere alle billeder i hver sin kategori, ødelægger fuldstændig mine muligheder for rimeligt hurtigt at danne mig et overblik over hvad vi har af billeder fra Hirtshals. --Hjart (talk) 18:13, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Hjart - det var på ingen måde min hensigt at ødelægge dine muligheder. Jeg har lavet over 10.000 tilføjelser og rettelser, det kan ikke undgås at dette vil forekomme. Du ruller bare tilbage. God aften, --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 18:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sortering af billeder i Ribe

edit

En eller anden turist har fornylig dumpet en masse billeder i Category:Ribe. Jeg har sorteret en del af dem. Kan du finde ud af at sortere resten?--Hjart (talk) 16:15, 12 September 2021 (UTC) @Hjart - så skulle de være på plads :-) Alt godt, --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 16:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Geokodning/koordinater

edit

Jeg bruger "Indstillinger->Gadgets->Locator-tool" ret meget. Den er meget anvendelig når man gerne vil vise hvor et givet billede er taget. --Hjart (talk) 08:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Når man har aktiveret den, kommer der et link i sideboksen.--Hjart (talk) 08:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Sovjet tank passing Kreschchatistreet, Kiel on the 6. of november 1943.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sovjet tank passing Kreschchatistreet, Kiel on the 6. of november 1943.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Discostu (talk) 10:50, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dronnings Mølle

edit

Bemærk at kategorier som f.eks. Category:Dronnings Mølle ikke forsvinder bare fordi du sletter indholdet. En bedre ide kunne være at omdøbe den til andet brug (og fjerne markeringen ved "Efterlad en omdirigering", så der netop ikke laves en ny side.).--Hjart (talk) 14:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hej @Hjart - jeg blanker dem ellers netop fordi, at jeg har bemærket, at der er en bot, der sletter dem..... Beklager, hvis jeg har taget fejl mvh. @Tdn70 Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 14:21, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ok, det var jeg så ikke klar over.--Hjart (talk) 14:27, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Peter Elfelt galleri

edit

Har du bemærket galleriet Peter Elfelt, som en tysk bruger lige har oprettet? Det ser meget fint ud og du har jo uploadet de fleste af billederne.--Hjart (talk) 12:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tak for hint @Hjart - alle hans skønne billeder gemt i en Access database - godt flere nu kan få glæde af hans billeder --Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 13:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Tak for at uploade billederne. :) vh, Catfisheye (talk) 09:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jeg har nogle spørgsmål Catfisheye (talk) 09:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

1. Det er færgen, der hedder Messina - ved ikke lige hvordan, det skal formuleres tydeligere?
2. Du har ret - der står 1903 på billedet. Den kilde jeg har sagde 1902.... Jeg retter det Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 16:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hej og tak for svar. :) Elfelt skriver Marseilles Dampfærge i Messina. Hvad er grunden til, at du tror, at billedet ikke blev optaget i Messina? For omgivelserne matcher jo mere Messina end Marseille? :) Catfisheye (talk) 17:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nu ser jeg, at der står det modsatte på billedet..... her er ren copy/paste at min kilde til billedet: FRANKRIG. MARSEILLE. DAMPFÆRGE MESSINA - men vi er naturligvis i Messina.... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 17:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
Super. Jeg var nemlig ret sikker i min sag og havde allerede omkategoriseret billedet og men tænkte, at det ville være bedst at spørge dig. Catfisheye (talk) 17:31, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937 (c).jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937 (c).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937 (b).jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937 (b).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:KB - Århus, d. 5 februar 1937.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

shizhao (talk) 07:18, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Billeder af Holger Damgaard og andre der er død i mere end 70 år

edit

Hej Tdn70

Ovenstående ville have slettet billederne, fordi de havde den forkerte licens. {{PD-old-70}} er den man skal for det meste bruge i disse tilfælde. mvh Catfisheye (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2022 (UTC) p.s. Jeg har rettet licenserne.Reply

ok - men hvis man tjekker linket - så er rettighederne givet fri..... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 15:32, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ja, men det er opgave af uploaderen at angive den rigtige licens. :)
Der er i øvrigt et problem med en af dine andre uploads: File:Christiansborg Slot set i fugleperspektiv fra Nikolaj Kirke, d. 4 Februar 1939.jpg er ikke umiddelbart frit, siden fotografen er ukendt og licensen på europeana-websitet er en anden end den du angav. Eller overser jeg der noget? :) Catfisheye (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Under alle Holger Damgaards billeder på Kb.dk's hjemmeside står:
Ophavsret Materialet er fri af ophavsret
Hvordan kan det ikke være rigtigt i forhold til, hvad jeg angiver?
Omkring Europeana-delingen, er jeg sgu også selv kommet i tvivl.... De skriver på deres hjemmeside, at ved deling, skal man angive præcist det, som jeg skriver under Billedebeskrivelse.
Så egentlig er det ok? Jeg har bare opdaget, at hvis jeg går direkte på kilden og ikke via Europeana - så stemmer licens ikke altid med den Europeana opgaver.
Så er det ikke nemt.... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 16:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ja, med Holger Damgaards billeder er alt fint.
Men Christiansborg-Slots-billedet er også ifølge KB muligvis beskyttet, netop fordi fotografen er ukendt. [1] Og nej, det er i hvert fald ikke altid nemt. :) Catfisheye (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hej, det er mig igen. Men også dette billede, du uploadede er ikke fri: File:Justitia Festen i Stege den 6. Februar 1908.jpg. Jeg tænker, det er bedst, hvis du ønskede deletion for begge billeder, inden en anden gør det. vh, Catfisheye (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
kan godt se, at det er gået lige hurtigt nok... Men jeg ved ikke, hvordan man "ønsker deletion"..... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 11:19, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hej, til venstre, har du en værktøjsliste. Hos mig er det nok nummer 9 under værktøjer, når du er på billedets side. :) Catfisheye (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Category:1820-01-29

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 20:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


Category:Ribes bisperække

edit

Palosirkka (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Kort over ønskede billeder på dawiki

edit

Er du opmærksom på Kategori:Bygningsbillede_savnes (klik på "kort" øverst i højre side) på dawiki? Der er en del muligheder hvis du skulle have brug for mål for en fototur.--Hjart (talk) 06:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

tak for tippet - det vil jeg gøre til udflugtsmål! Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 06:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nye billeder i Ribe

edit

Hvis du er interesseret i et overblik over nye billeder af Ribe, kan du køre Petscan søgningen https://petscan.wmflabs.org/?psid=22284936. Den finder pt. ~480 fotos (de fleste taget af mig). Hjart (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Justitia Festen i Stege den 6. Februar 1908.jpg

edit

Hej!

Jeg har lige set, at denne fil er blevet slettet. Hvad er anledningen til, at du mener, at den muligvis ikke er fri?

Ophavsret er besværligt og Commons:Hirtle chart er i alt fald ikke let at forstå. Men jeg mener umiddelbart at der er gode chancer for, at ophavsretten rent faktisk er udløbet.

I USA har vi {{PD-US-expired}} og {{PD-1996}}. I Danmark har vi {{PD-Denmark50}} og {{Anonymous-EU}}. --MGA73 (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hej - hvis du kigger lidt længere oppe, kan du se, at jeg bliver gjort opmærksom på, at rettighederne ikke er blevet gjort fri..... God dag Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 15:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nordsøen IMO?

edit

Er du sikker på IMO nummer for File:Fishing Support Vessel Nordsoen.jpg? Via Wikidata fandt jeg den svenske artikel sv:Nordsøen (2022), hvor der er angivet et andet IMO nummer. Det lyder meget som om det er det samme skib du har fotograferet. Hjart (talk) 20:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hej - så vidt jeg kan se, så handler din artikel om et andet skib - men de ligner godt nok hinanden. Her er det jeg har fotograferet: https://www.vesselfinder.com/da/vessels/NORDSOEN-IMO-9919230-MMSI-219030533 Prøv at søg på IMO nummeret fra artiklen oppe i højre hjørne. God dag, Thomas Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 03:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
jeg finder det ret usandsynligt at den svenske artikel kan handle om et andet nybygget dansk fiskerikontrolfartøj ved navn "Nordsøen", så jeg tænker svenskerne må have fået galt fat på IMO nummeret. Hjart (talk) 06:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Men hvis du slår de to IMO numre op, ser du billederne af skibene - de ligner hinanden utrolig meget. Så skal de have ændret på skorstenene, efter de har bygget dem..... Selv om jeg ikke er uenig i dit synspunkt. God dag, Thomas 95.166.186.204 06:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Det er stadig usandsynligt at der findes to nybyggede danske fartøjer med samme navn og funktion. Jeg kan ikke umiddelbart slå de numre op (Det kræver registrering og jeg har ikke umiddelbart lyst til at registrere mig flere steder end jeg allerede er). Et af fartøjerne må have et andet navn end det angivne. Hjart (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:15, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ptolemy?

edit

Hvorfor har du ikke kaldt File:Ptolemy (ship, 1998) arriving in Bremerhaven.jpg "Autoprogress" og lagt den i Category:Autoprogress (ship, 1998)? Hjart (talk) 21:46, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, jeg har oprettet separat skib - men det er korrekt at den peger på en IMO nummer, der også indeholder et skib, der hedder Autoprogress. Det hedder firmaet, der ejer skibet...... I dag er der ikke et skib, der hedder sådan. Jeg kan ikke vurdere, om der har været et skib, der har heddet sådan engang. Det er ikke mig, der har oprettet Autoprogress (ship, 1998) Måske de er startet med et skib og har så udvidet flåden og ændret navnet på deres første skib. Jeg ved det ikke... Håber det svar. Mvh. Thomas Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 07:54, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Jeg undrer mig bare over at du har kaldt skibet "Ptolemy", når der tydeligt står "Autoprogress" på det, ligesom på billederne i Category:Autoprogress (ship, 1998). Hjart (talk) 08:18, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Forståeligt - men når jeg søger på Wesselfinder, er der ikke noget skib, der hedder sådan. Der er et selskab, der ejer skibet, der hedder sådan.... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 08:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Der står ikke andet end "Autoprogress" på nogen af de billeder jeg har set. og i Q52344141 er skibet oprettet under navnet "Autoprogress". Hvis skibet hedder "Ptolemy" burde det så ikke stå på det? Hjart (talk) 08:33, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
jeg bruger normalt de officielle registre til at registrere ud fra: https://www.vesselfinder.com/da/vessels/details/9131967
jeg kan ikke modargumentere - men der findes ikke et officielt skib, der hedder Autoprogress - ikke længere. Jeg skal ikke kunne sige, om der har været et... Men de har to skibe, der ligner hinanden: https://www.vesselfinder.com/da/vessels/details/9190157 Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 09:25, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
https://www.vesselfinder.com/da/vessels/details/9131967 under "Hoverdata" er der en linje der lyder "Skibets navn = AUTOPROGRESS". Hjart (talk) 09:59, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Under det andet skib lyder den tilsvarende linje "Skibets navn = AUTOPRESTIGE".--Hjart (talk) 10:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:28, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Legoland 2005 (aa).jpg

edit
 
File:Legoland 2005 (aa).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lukas Beck (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 06:33, 12 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

edit
 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Axel Hansen

edit

Jeg har kigget på https://www.kulturarv.dk/kid/VisWeilbach.do?kunstnerId=7003&wsektion=vaerker, gættet lidt med hensyn til tilføjelser til Category:Axel Hansen (architect) og muligvis taget fejl i et par tilfælde. Kan du tjekke kategorien? Hjart (talk) 10:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Will do - siger du at det Kulturarv har listet er 100% korrekt i forhold til, at der ikke er andre værker end dem de lister? Pft. Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 10:39, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Jeg gætter på at deres liste ikke er komplet, men ellers korrekt. Hjart (talk) 10:49, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Så jeg sletter dem Kulturarv ikke har, selv om listen ikke er komplet? Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 10:54, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Det var ikke det jeg havde tænkt mig. Du må gerne bare tjekke mine tilføjelser og se om de er korrekte. Hjart (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
oki - will do Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 11:03, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Sagen er at jeg har gættet mig frem til hvilke bygninger Kulturarv refererer til og ikke er helt sikker på om jeg har gættet rigtigt. Hjart (talk) 11:04, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Jeg har selv skrevet artiklen på Wikipedia baseret på en udførlig artikel om Axel Hansen. Jeg er i tvivl om biografbygningen - nuværende Sct. Nicolajgade 16. Jeg vil mene, at det er en tidligere bygning, der husede biograften, efter flytningen fra Overdammen 7 og til Sct. Nicolajgade. Den bygning findes ikke mere... Og derfor ikke den nuværende Sct. Nicolajgade 16....
Mellemdammen 22 synes jeg ikke at finde noget på omkring Axel Hansen....
Heller ikke Sct. Nicolajgade 18 - selv om det godt nok ligner en bygning efter Axel Hansens hånd.... Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 07:24, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Peder Hvitfeldts Stræde 7

edit

Bemærk venligst at ovenstående adresse er ca midt på gaden og altså ikke en hjørnebygning. Hjart (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Danaide by Johannes C. Bjerg.jpg

edit
 
File:Danaide by Johannes C. Bjerg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 23 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Maleri fra Ribe

edit

Har du nogen ide om præcist hvilken gade File:Johan-rohde-gadeparti-fra-ribe,-der-flages-med-dannebrog.jpg forestiller? Bygningen for enden minder om Sønderportsgade 37, men de andre genkender jeg ikke. Hjart (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vi er i Gråbrødregade, hvor mange af bygningerne desværre ikke er mere.... Så du genkender det korrekte hus :-) Mvh. Thomas Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 19:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Den hvide gavl til venstre er nr 7 og den gule og den grønne facade derefter er nr 9, som ifølge https://www.kulturarv.dk/fbb/sagvis.pub?sag=14627762 er forhøjet før maleren Johan Rohdes fødsel. Har jeg ret? Hjart (talk) 09:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah - jeg vil mene nr. 7 er det hus, der stikker længere ud end de andre, midt i gaden. Der hvor de to personer er. Det er svært at sige. præcist hvor stor den kunstneriske frihed har været. Huset bagerst i husrækken til venstre, er i hver fald det tidligere Sønderportsgade 12, inden det blev revet ned. Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 11:45, 24 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Lego minifigur - Lester.jpg

edit
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Lego minifigur - Lester.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Yours sincerely, Belbury (talk) 15:14, 30 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Lego minifigur - Lester.jpg

edit
 
File:Lego minifigur - Lester.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 18:45, 1 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stormflodsmærke?

edit

Præcist hvor fandt du File:Mærket der markerer hvor højt vandet stod i 1634, Ribe Domkirke.jpg? Hjart (talk) 19:26, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

det er på en af de piller i det sydøstlige hjørne af kirken - er det præcist nok? Thomas Dahlstrøm Nielsen Tdn70 09:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply