Open main menu
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ThatBPengineer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Contents

File tagging File:Svatoslav Ton.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Svatoslav Ton.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Svatoslav Ton.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Tagging copyviosEdit

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 18:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Also be careful when the watermark matches the uploader's name. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:20, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Hi, thanks . But there are at times, where the uploaders take pics from someone FB and put watermarks on it and claim it as their own masterpieces. Plus, if they wanted to promote photography, there are other platform to showcase their photography skills. - ThatBPengineer (talk) 02:07, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Boites de Xanax et d'alprazolam en ce moment dans les pharmacies.jpgEdit

Hello!. You should always try to categorize your uploaded media in a more accurate category. In this case Category:Alprazolam. Before upload a media, you should browse by categories to determine the most convenient one/s (or create a new category). Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 18:00, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Bio-Strath.jpgEdit

Hello!. You should always try to categorize your uploaded media in a more accurate category. In this case Category:Dietary supplements. Before upload a media, you should browse by categories to determine the most convenient one/s (or create a new category). Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 18:02, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

CopyvioEdit

Hello, this picture was imported in 2014 and you can see in this archive [1] that the original file is under Creative Commons license. Sincerely. Bastenbas (talk) 13:43, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

HelloEdit

First of all, I inform you that removed your abusive {{Copyvio}} in File:Ticket péage.jpg (histlogsabuse log) – the tag is not a catch-all thing for all grievances.

Then a question. Two weeks ago you opted to register a new account instead of renaming the former one. May I ask you… is the former account abandoned now? Or your intention is to edit using both? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:48, 5 January 2019 (UTC)


Hello, for first question, as long as the Wikimedia Commons have a pictures that shows following quality: Copyrighted from somewehere else in Internet (especially with the big watermarks of (Copyright of bla bla...) , shows the details of the personal life of other people without permission, cyber bullying I will tagged it for speedy deletion. Commons have lots of this low quality images. The reasons I am doing it because I have cousins whose friends have Photoshop her faces and posted on Wikimedia Commons (it was left on Common for freaking 5 years before I tag it for takedown) , therefore it is my mission to remove as much of this material as possible.

Secondly, I forget the previous accounts passwords after I reformat my PC.

Thanks and have a nice day/night ThatBPengineer (talk) 01:51, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

CroppingEdit

Hello. Please read COM:OVERWRITE and COM:WATERMARK.

Please particularly note the following:

  • Minor cropping to remove borders etc is permissible except where the image is a historical document or artwork. This cropping should be the minimum amount necessary - if you desire a more cropped version for any reason then create a new, derivative file and do not overwrite the original.
  • Do not unnecessarily crop images to remove text that can easily be digitally removed.
  • If you do remove text, you must record the removed text in the file description.

I have corrected a couple of your crops today:

No big deal, but please bear these points in mind in future. Thank you. -- Begoon 08:44, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

WarningEdit

Hi, I told you to inform the uploader. Please use the gadget to tag copyright violations. And please read the criteria for deletion requests. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:37, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, which images you refer to ?

File:Broken half dzis,.jpgEdit

Hi, 'low quality' is not a kind of copyright violation. Use a regular DR for such cases, using the 'nominate for deletion' link from the 'tools' menu. Jcb (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Okie... Perhaps Wikimedia can revamp the criteria for deletion menu. So obscure to use it ThatBPengineer (talk) 03:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Tagging of copyright violationsEdit

Hi. Please don't use rationales such as "Personal photos" and "Promotional materials" in the {{Copyvio}} template. That template is for copyright issues only. See COM:CSD for other criteria for speedy deletion, and if an image meets none of those, please raise a normal deletion request. Thank you, Storkk (talk) 11:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Storkk: bad tagging by this user is a long-term problem. Would you start a noticeboard thread? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
You've warned them once, Jcb has warned them once and I've warned them once. I won't start a thread yet, no. However, the disruptive behavior should stop. Storkk (talk) 11:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I thought the copyright vio also can be used as for speedy deletion. I just saw many images here are the self promotion materials. For example, leaving contact number / FB/ IG address construe as self promotion right ?
Also, there are at times where the uploaders upload their selfie (there are social network which done just that) ThatBPengineer (talk) 11:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
ThatBPengineer thinks so, other people thinks otherwise. OK to discuss it on talk pages, but ThatBPengineer must refrain from posing with personal opinions as if these were Commons policies accepted by the entire community. Again, there are Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion, these are an official policy. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

This copyvio notice is invalid. Commons is not censored, and it’s not a copyvio. -- 1989 (talk) 09:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, You should NOT tag files for copyright violations when they are not OBVIOUS copyvios. Rather to create a proper deletion requests for uncertain cases: link is not older or bigger than the file on Commons, etc. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

AN/UEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#ThatBPengineer. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Also for Storkk’s and 1989’s attention. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you as my actions has bring out some of the issues faced why Commons are at now effectively still riddled with contents that are copyrighted and why the Commons File Upload Wizard should be integrated with Google Reverse Image Search so that the images which are obviously on the Internet should be stopped from be uploaded onto Commons. I rest my case here. It was fun while it lasted. ThatBPengineer (talk) 11:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Pu Khai Kam.jpgEdit

 
File:Pu Khai Kam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 15:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

SocksEdit

Hi, You should declare all your accounts, and keep only one. Otherwise you may be blocked for abusing multiple accounts. See Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Thatonewikiguy. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Your account has been blockedEdit

1989 (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by ThatonewikiguyEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Although you are currently blocked, you can speak in your defence here. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Writings_in_HinduEdit

E4024 (talk) 03:16, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

COM:AN/BEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#ThatBPengineer. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 10:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear ThatBPengineer,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Hale.jpg and Mech_lab.gifEdit

https://s3-ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/gigsplash/artists/HaleHale1128/profile_image/HaleHale11281477435967.jpg has the server date in February, 2017 – when was the Commons file uploaded? http://www.macet.edu.in/img/mechlab4.gif has the server date in 2018 – how many years is the same image hosted on Commons? These your links don’t prove anything. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:07, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

And the case of G is nonsense at all – http://www.wallpapers-full-hd.com/backgrounds/g-letter-fire.jpg has the orange letter, notwithstanding that it is from June 6, 2016, whereas our file is from 2014. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:16, 20 May 2019 (UTC)


The beast was uploaded to Commons on September, 2015 in high resolution, whereas https://siryl.tumblr.com/post/154034338048#center features a downsample, and the date is December, 2016. Yet few such false alarms and you can become an ignorable person. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

@Incnis Mrsi: This user is finding potential copyvios in good faith. While some is not blatant and require DRs, there’s no need for the hostility. Plus, unless something requires my immediate attention, please don’t ping me again. -- 1989 (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyvio baitingEdit

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Português | Русский | Sicilianu | Svenska | +/−


 
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Sysop 1989 takes ThatBPengineer’s baits. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:31, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "ThatBPengineer".