Open main menu

User talk:The Nature Box

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, The Nature Box!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 01:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Contents

Your videosEdit

Hello, please use also the video related categories/subcategories for your uploads. So it will be much easier to find an interesting video here in the ocean of pictures. Thanks and best wishes, --Pristurus (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

OK I will do that. Thank you Pristurus for all your contributions and great work! The Nature Box (talk) 22:41, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
You are welcome, we need more videos here and in wikipedia. So please go on in producing clips... Greetings from rainy Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 23:37, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Wasp flying around the leaves of a tree.webmEdit

Hi, as far as I can see Polistes flavus is an American species. For me it looks more like a Polistes olivaceus (yellow legs and antennae) but I am not a specialist in Asiatic hymnoptera... Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 21:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Pristurusǃ Oh yes, thank you very much for pointing that out. Apologies for my mistake -- Polistes flavus does indeed seem to be an American species, and the website below confirms that Polistes olivaceus is found in India. I have changed the video page now so it shows the correct name. Thanks againǃ (and thank you for all your efforts for WikiMediaǃ) The Nature Box (talk) 23:11, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

http://www.projectnoah.org/spottings/7506009

Bringing Commons materials to YouTubeEdit

Hi, your YouTube channel seems to imply that you upload materials from Commons to YouTube. Is this correct? If so, where is the code? I am interested in doing this for the files uploaded to Commons by the Open Access Media Importer Bot. Thanks, -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 04:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Daniel, Thank you for your message. Yes, that is correct; almost all of the material on my YouTube channel comes from Commons. I am not sure what you mean by code? I manually uploaded the files to YouTube rather than using any sort of code. I'm sorry if I have misunderstood you here. Could you please explain what you mean about the code? Thanks The Nature Box (talk) 06:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
I had just assumed that you'd have automated that. Pinging User:McZusatz who I think uses a YouTube2Commons tool (though I can't find that now). -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 12:42, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Indeed, I use help:youtube2mediawiki to transfer files. I never did it in the reverse direction but my assumption is that this is the easier problem to solve. --McZusatz (talk) 19:35, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh I see. No I didn't use any tool. No doubt there are some technical wizards who could do it though :) The Nature Box (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your YouTube channel, request on my talk pageEdit

Hi, please have a look to my talk page. Maybe there are some problems with the type of license you used on YouTube. Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 09:27, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

thank youEdit

Thank you for uploading your beautiful videos of wildlife! I have used some of them to illustrate English Wikipedia articles. Best, -- Phoebe (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi Phoebe. Oh that's greatǃ I am glad they are proving of some use. Thank you very much. --The Nature Box (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bellis perennis (English daisy).webmEdit

Hi, maybe Bellis perennis is a misidentification. Please have a look at Talk:Main_Page#Media_of_the_Day_.3F_Bellis_perennis_in_Tokyo. Greetings, --Pristurus (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi Pristurus Thank you for your message :) Oh yes! Unfortunately that is my mistake and I misidentified it. I believe I have found the correct species now -- Annual fleabane (Erigeron annuus). This flower is native to North America but is now widespread in Japan also. I will take more care in the future, especially when the file is Media of the Day. All the best~

The Nature Box (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

No problem, we all are human beings, we all make mistakes... Regards, --Pristurus (talk) 21:53, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

CC on YTEdit

Hi, if you upload CC video from Commons, why you use YT standard license instead of CC? --109.81.209.251 08:34, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, thanks for your message. Yes, I did wonder myself if this was OK. I have carefully thought about it and the reasons are as followsː
1) YouTube only allows a standard license or an attribution license, which is "Attribution 3.0 Unported." Attribution 3.0 Unported might be suitable for some Commons files, but certainly not all -- most have a different license.
2) I have carefully checked the Creative Commons license (for example, CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en). It saysː “You are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format” and “Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially”. Please note the part saying that “commercial use” is OK.
With BY-SA attribution licenses, it says “ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original." But in my case, I do not “remix, transform, or build upon the material” – it is exactly the original material, and therefore uploading on YT's standard license is OK, I believe.
More details about reusing content outside Wikimedia can be found hereː https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Reusing_content_outside_Wikimedia
Sorry for the long answer. If I have misunderstood something with regards to the licenses, please let me knowǃ The Nature Box (talk) 08:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Uploading videosEdit

Hi TNB - how does one upload videos? I wanted to upload File:Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) in the city 2.webm from here to go with File:Kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) in the city 1.webm, but I can't get it to work. Any clues, please? - MPF (talk) 18:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi MPF, I'm not sure if my way is the absolute best way to do it, but it seems to produce good enough results :)

1) First, I use Firefox as a browser. Then, you need to install two extensionsː FlashGot (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/flashgot/) and also Firefogg (http://firefogg.org/).
2) Next, go to the Flickr video you want to download, and play it in the browser.
3) While it is playing, you can click the FlashGot icon at the top right of your browser (the icon looks like a little piece of film) to download it.
4) Once it has downloaded, you go to Wikimedia "upload file page" (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard) and select the video. Firefogg should then automatically convert the video to webm format.

Points to noteː
1) If you want to upload files larger than 100 MB, you will need to enable the experimental "Chunked uploads" setting in your user preferences (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Maximum_file_size)
2) For some reason, Wikimedia's upload page doesn't seem to like apostrophes in the names of files, so it is best to avoid using apostrophes in the title of the video you are going to upload.

Hope this helps, and thank you for contributing to Wikimediaǃ The Nature Box (talk) 22:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! Been forgetting to reply - but when I tried to install Firefogg, Firefox (which I use too) said it was unsafe and warned me against installing it (so I didn't!). Something gone wrong at firefogg's site? - MPF (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
I think that's probably an incorrect warning. I have been using Firefogg without any ill effects, and the Wikimedia help page says "Firefox users are encouraged to install the Firefogg-Addon and use the UploadWizard to upload video. UploadWizard will then automatically convert the video file to highest quality using Firefogg (if necessary) and users do not have to fiddle with conversion parameters." (Please see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Video)
Or, if you still feel unhappy about using Firefogg, you could look for other software (freeware etc.) that can convert video to webm format first, and then upload it to Wikimedia. This site (http://www.online-convert.com/) can also convert to webm free of charge, but you have to pay to convert files over a certain size.
Cheers The Nature Box (talk) 00:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! I'll check that out. MPF (talk) 11:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
In appreciation of all the wildlife videos you've uploaded. I've enjoyed seeing these and reviewing them. Keep 'em coming! INeverCry 23:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you very muchǃ I shall display it with pride :) The Nature Box (talk) 03:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

A kitten for you!Edit

Hiya, thanks for those wildlife videos that you uploaded. I saw those videos while I am reviewing some Flickr images. Your contributions are appreciated. Keep up the good work!  

Poké95 03:07, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank youǃ I don't think I've ever been given a kitten before. I shall carefully look after it. The Nature Box (talk) 06:38, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

File tagging File:Haleakala National Park.webmEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Haleakala National Park.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

howcheng {chat} 19:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi Howcheng, thank you for your message. I'm not sure how to do this properly, but if you click the Vimeo link shown in "Source" in the summary on Wikimedia, it takes you to this page
https://vimeo.com/155490675
Then, if you click "more", just under the video title, a window pops up. At the bottom of that window is a faint grey circle icon with a little person in it.
Finally, if you click that icon it takes to the video license page for Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
So I think it should be OK to have this video on Wikimedia. I wish there was an easier linking method. Please let me know if you know of one.
The Nature Box (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi again, I have just put a message on the talk page of the reviewer Yann, asking him to verify the video, so hopefully it should be sorted out soon. Many thanks The Nature Box (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, I completely missed that "more" link. I spent about 5 minutes trying to find a license declaration and gave up. howcheng {chat} 19:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Export to Youtube not suitableEdit

Hello "The Nature Box", you have uploaded my video File:Hooded Crow (Corvus cornix) cleans rain gutter.webm to your Google/Youtube channel putting it under the "Standard YouTube License": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vkBJV5p-QJU. This is not according to the licence under which I published it and I hereby ask you to remove it as soon as possible. I want to decide myself, if and when I upload it to G/YT (and most likely on my own channel). --.js[democracy needed] 23:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi js, thank you for your message. I have had this argument/discussion a number of times on talk pages, and as I understand it the Share Alike license does allow a video to be uploaded to YouTube under the standard license. (I would like someone to tell me in specific terms why Share Alike is not compatible with YouTube.) Anyway, in the interest of avoiding "conflict" of course I will delete itǃ I have just done so, so it is now no longer on my YouTube channel. All the best The Nature Box (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Well, that answer is very easy: just read the CC-by-SA 3.0 licensing terms, esp. "... You may not sublicense the Work.... You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the terms of: (i) this License; (ii) a later version of this License with the same License Elements as this License; (iii) a Creative Commons jurisdiction license (either this or a later license version) that contains the same License Elements as this License (e.g., Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 US)); (iv) a Creative Commons Compatible License." The "standard YT license" is no CC-by-SA 3.0 license, nor anyway near that. Just adding the CC-by-SA terms to the YT description does not remove the YT license. --.js[democracy needed] 01:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi js, I am not convinced by your answer with regards to the "You may not sublicense the Work" part.
Because it says here https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/License_Versions
"None of the Creative Commons licenses grant permission to sublicense the licensed material.”
None of the CC licenses allow for sublicensing – not just Share Alike licenses – but also for example the Attribution 3.0 Unported
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode
So, if sublicensinɡ means using a standard YouTube license then you cannot put any CC work on YouTube, including say Kevin MacLeod’s CC BY 3.0 work, which is ridiculous isn’t it? There must be a million YouTube videos with Kevin MacLeod's work on them.
I believe sublicensing means something different here, something like making material available for re-use under the GNU General Public License (GPL).
But the main point of my argument about why using CC by SA on YouTube is OK, is that this webpage https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
says “You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Which is exactly what happens when you upload it to YouTube — you are redistributing it. The Nature Box (talk) 03:15, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
I'm still working on an answer trying to get an official written WMDE/WMF statement (only have it spoken yet). But please take into account that it is your duty to care about respecting licences, not the uploader's duty. I guess we both know why you do not provide any business adress for your commercial pages https://www.youtube.com/user/TheNatureBox/about https://plus.google.com/111027624205835591649 https://twitter.com/TheNatBox --.js[democracy needed] 08:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi js, I'm sorry but I don't understand your last message very well. Does "WMDE/WMF" mean Wikimedia Deutschland and the WikiMedia Foundation? What have they got to do with the licenses? The licenses are issued by the Creative Commons organization. And I am respecting the licenses, as I thought I had explained. The "business address" point you made is really puzzling -- I am not a business, I am just an individual with a YouTube channel.The Nature Box (talk) 08:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Video2commonsEdit

Hi The Nature Box, you can use the video2commons tool to automatically import Commons-compatible content in the future. (Other helpful tools include flickr2commons for Flickr, commonshelper for trans-wiki moving, and toollabs:croptool for creating derivative images.) Thanks for your contributions, czar 05:52, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Czar, Thanks for that information. I will definitely check out those tools. All the best The Nature Box (talk) 09:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear The Nature Box,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


Sudden change of Motd/2016-06-23Edit

Hi, could you kindly tell me, why you have suddenly chanded my proposed Video of day for today? If nothing more, you made great chaos in the description of if for instance from Czech language, because you changed video but not this description. --Karelj (talk) 10:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Karelj, I'm sorry that I suddenly changed the Media of the Day (MotD) but I had strong doubts about the music featured in the video. I checked on the Vimeo page that the video came from, but there was no mention about the music. In my experience, people quite often put a Creative Commons license on a Vimeo video, but then add copyrighted music to itǃ Therefore, I put a deletion request on the video here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Port_of_Amsterdam_-_SAIL_2015.webm
and in the meantime, uploaded a version without audio, which I scheduled for Media of the Day for June 25. So, again I must say sorry to you for the sudden change but I believe that was better than featuring a Video of the Day that had copyrighted music on it, since that wouldn't do Wikimedia's reputation any good. Hope that explains my actions.The Nature Box (talk) 11:09, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Well, but when I see the correct licence confirmation:
 
This file, which was originally posted to https://vimeo.com/137207040, was reviewed on by the administrator or reviewer INeverCry, who confirmed that it was available there under the stated license on that date.
than I believe, that everything is OK and I work with file as whole as certied material. So if you think, that User:INeverCry is dooing someting wrong you should to dicsuss this with him. Anyway I shall stop my work on Video of day lookig for from now, because this is only wasting of time, which I can spent more effectively dooing other work in Commons. Good luck with everyday choosing the VOD.--Karelj (talk) 13:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
@Karelj:, @The Nature Box: Sorry for the confusion. This is totally my fault. I'm careful about these reviews, but now and then I mess up on one. I'll be extra careful with these in future. Again, my apologies. INeverCry 18:15, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
@Karelj:, @INeverCry:No problems at all. As INeverCry says, without any other info, the safe choice is to use the version with no audio. And I know very well how easy it is to not notice audio in a video, I've done it myself many times. Karelj, I'm sorry you feel it was a bad mistake or the wrong choice to move the Video of the Day. Please go on choosing media for videos of the day, because this was nothing personal against you at all, and I think it is a very rare occurrence. Also, could I point out we are all volunteers here, and of course people make mistakes, so things like this will always happen now and then. All the bestThe Nature Box (talk) 21:27, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

File:Map of Mejiro-no-Mori 2016 11 30.jpgEdit

 
File:Map of Mejiro-no-Mori 2016 11 30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

G I Chandor (talk) 03:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Papilio videosEdit

Hi! I noticed that neither this video nor this one show Papilio machaon. Can you please check the species? --LamBoet (talk) 21:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. Unfortunately, it seems there are 11 types of Papilio in Japan and I cannot identify which one it is, so I have renamed the file to just "Papilio". The Nature Box (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
Looking into this list, it looks like the only compatible species is Papilio xuthus. Can you please make the change? --LamBoet (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
I think you're right! Thanks very much. I have edited the file information. The Nature Box (talk) 09:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Renaming videosEdit

When renaming videos, please purge the file page after doing so, and then reset all the transcodes (at the bottom of the file page). Unfortunately (and it's a bug that has been complained about) when you move a file the transcodes are not automatically recreated. Thanks. - Reventtalk 22:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know. I'll make sure I do that from now on. The Nature Box (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Media of the dayEdit

Hi, I thought you might like to know that your video, File:Common Moorhen (Gallinula chloropus).webm, has been tagged as media of the day for 15 July 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 19:45, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

That's great. Thank you for letting me know. All the best The Nature Box (talk) 20:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) as a pet.webmEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus) as a pet.webm. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Guanaco (talk) 08:55, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi Guanaco, thank you for your message. If you click the Vimeo link shown in "Source" in the summary on Wikimedia, it takes you to this page

https://vimeo.com/33109186 Then, if you click "more", just under the video title, a window pops up. At the bottom of that window is a faint grey circle icon with a little person in it. Finally, if you click that icon it takes to the video license page for Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ So I think it should be OK to have this video on Wikimedia. The Nature Box (talk) 09:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing this out. I clicked "more" but I missed the little grey icon. I'll go ahead and remove the no permission template and pass the license review. Guanaco (talk) 09:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 18:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Pipevine swallowtail (Battus phileno).webmEdit

Copyright status: File:Pipevine swallowtail (Battus phileno).webm

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pipevine swallowtail (Battus phileno).webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:40, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "The Nature Box".