Open main menu

Contents

File:- ITALY - Fiat Punto (188) in Veneto.JPGEdit

Please, if you think a category not listed, but still inherent to photography, do not remove it, rather than use a more specific subcategory. thank you very much. --Pava (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Fair enough, but after looking through the commons policy on categorisation, I have a question to ask. Why is this file not listed in Category:Wheels, or Category:Grass, or for that matter, Category:Bird's nests in backgrounds of photos taken in Italy? It seems a little inconsistent to put it in Category: Clouds in Italy and not in Category: Grass in Italy, after all, both the grass and clouds in this photo are equivalently relevant, certainly in terms of the space each feature takes up in the frame. Your subject here is a Fiat Punto, not clouds, or bird's nests, or wheels, or grass. Wouldn't you therefore categorise it as such? Or is there something I'm missing?Thennicke (talk) 12:06, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Thennicke,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street scene, Dean St Albury NSW.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury transport infrastructure.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 17:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury botanical gardens 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:42, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hume Freeway at Albury 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:ANA soldier with RPG-7 in 2013-cropped.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ANA soldier with RPG-7 in 2013-cropped.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:CSIRO ScienceImage 4350 CSIROs Parkes Radio Telescope with moon in the background.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CSIRO ScienceImage 2212 CSIRO Parkes Telescope This photo taken in 1969 shows the telescope as it was around the time of the first manned Moon landing.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cloud cumulonimbus at baltic sea(1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cloud cumulonimbus at baltic sea(1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

File talk:CSIRO ScienceImage 3881 Five Antennas at Narrabri.jpgEdit

See above discussion. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 08:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Camargue Étang de Vaccarès.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camargue Étang de Vaccarès.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:CSIRO ScienceImage 3881 Five Antennas at Narrabri.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:CSIRO ScienceImage 3881 Five Antennas at Narrabri.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Three wheeler in Pingyao.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Paints of sunrise on Langtang National Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paints of sunrise on Langtang National Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Нижня польська брама.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Нижня польська брама.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Astropecten lorioli.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Astropecten lorioli.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

AstropectenEdit

Thank you for file:Astropecten lorioli.jpg. I was not income FP long. You can do it again, anytime! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: My pleasure! :) Thanks for all your wonderful uploads! -- Thennicke (talk) 07:06, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:National Carillion, ACT - Rectilinear projection.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Carillion, ACT - Rectilinear projection.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Carillon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Titanacris.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Titanacris.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • Thank you for this promotion. I never thought that this could be interesting because it is very technical. You have good judgment. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Purpuricène.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Purpuricène.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

File:National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpgEdit

Hi Thennicke, I added a note on the image, I found a very small white line and at the same place the column seems not to be straight. Though nice image! Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:41, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

@Christian Ferrer: Hey Christian; thanks for taking the time to check the image. Unfortunately I don't see any error where you've marked on the image. Feel free to email me a screenshot of it (thennicke@gmail.com) and I'll do my best to fix it. Thanks again -- Thennicke (talk) 01:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:08, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Carillon, ACT - Rectilinear projection.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:45, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Library of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The PhotographerEdit

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)Edit

  * * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 18:25, 24 December 2016 (UTC)   

FormatEdit

Hi there! Please don't use the {{Weak support}} or any other template that the ordinary {{S}} or {{O}} at FPC. The BOT that is counting the votes doesn't recognize these parameters and the nomination may loose one vote. Use the piping instead like this: {{s|Weak support}} or perhaps {{o|Regretful oppose}}, resulting in:   Weak support and   Regretful oppose. I've fixed the 'weak support' vote you recently did so that it is fine now and can be counted. :) Cheers, cart-Talk 19:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the info Cart, I'll use piping from now on. -- Thennicke (talk) 23:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Overpass at Bowen Place, Canberra ACT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Overpass at Bowen Place, Canberra ACT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old and new Parliament Houses; Canberra Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Gallery from SW, Canberra Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! High Court of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telstra Tower from ANU campus, Canberra Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 02:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse Park Drive, North Canberra ACT at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Peulle 02:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cumulonimbus sunset detail, Albury NSW Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 02:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Overpass at Bowen Place, Canberra ACT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 07:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bethanga Bridge (Lake Hume) 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:05, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melbourne seen from the Spirit of Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Portrait Gallery building, ACT - perspective controlled.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road up Huon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Image could have been sharper and appears slightly tilted. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 05:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cumulonimbus sunset panorama, Albury NSW Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:High Court of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:High Court of Australia, ACT - perspective controlled 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eriophora transmarina in web at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:08, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Onopordum illyricum near Holbrook NSW Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, but the Latin name like writing angle.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hobart seen from the east.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 15:52, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strickland Avenue, Hobart Tas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 07:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Wellington from Sandy Bay, Hobart Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Highlights are very bright, but that looks realistic to me. -- Ikan Kekek 07:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CC lightning, Albury NSW.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Awesome capture, it looks a bit purple though, is this the natural color? There are also a number of dead pixels (look at full size) that needs to be cloned out. W.carter 16:22, 30 December 2016 (UTC)   Comment @W.carter: These are the SOOC colours, so as far as I know they're right. I'll remove the dead pixels and if you like I can reduce the saturation -- Thennicke 01:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)   Done Saturation reduced and dead pixels removed -- Thennicke 02:06, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks. I had to ask about the color since I've never done such a shot myself and I trust you. Good quality. --W.carter 09:38, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Classwood Cottage, Ross Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Wellington lookout, Hobart Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Arthur 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Weak   Support. Might have been a little sharper, but good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Arthur Guard Tower and Surrounds, Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Weak   Support Good quality. DoF small. IMO it should be f/8 or more. --XRay 07:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ibis at sunrise, Albury NSW Australia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 16:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eastern Grey kangaroo, Majura Nature Reserve ACT 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 14:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Old and new Parliament Houses; Canberra Australia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Old and new Parliament Houses; Canberra Australia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Arthur Penitentiary 2, Tasmania.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:FCCA GE C30-7 Infiernillo Viaduct.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FCCA GE C30-7 Infiernillo Viaduct.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

ParadeEdit

Maybe I'm being dense, but I'm not seeing the parade in File:ANZAC Parade from the Australian War Memorial, Canberra ACT.jpg. Where's the parade? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

@Ikan Kekek: Yes, you're being very dense :P Just kidding, the people who named Canberra's streets and sights were dense. This should clear things up for you. -- Thennicke (talk) 05:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
I see. Thanks. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Please use the move functionEdit

Rather than just creating a whole new category which will no longer have its history, please use the move function (ie: which will take you to a page like this). Bidgee (talk) 01:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

  • @Bidgee: I wasn't aware of that tool's existence until just then - thanks for that. In this situation I was just trying to change the "of" to an "in" to be consistent with the other subcats of Category:Nature reserves in Australia: I assume the tool still works even though it's "moving" the category to another that already exists? Thanks again and I'll use that in the future -- Thennicke (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ANZAC Parade from the Australian War Memorial, Canberra ACT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kosciuszko Main Range from Charlotte Pass 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prussian Creek Chain Bay, Kosciuszko Road, NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 11:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
In my opinion, this is excellent. -- Ikan Kekek 05:07, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anthochaera chrysoptera in Jacaranda tree, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 11:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
@Thennicke: Is it just my imagination or is has there been lots of cloning at the top of the picture? Charlesjsharp 13:11, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: None whatsoever. If you'd like a RAW file I can send it to you. The Jacaranda tree's leaves caused the rippled bokeh -- Thennicke 03:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Thanks :) It was the top right tree trunk I was thinking about. Charlesjsharp 12:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)~

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global surveyEdit

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historic Courthouse, Beechworth Victoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Halavar 12:40, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury from Monument Hill 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. --Basotxerri 15:56, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RhB ABe 8-12 Langwieser Viadukt.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RhB ABe 8-12 Langwieser Viadukt.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Woodland, Nadgigomar Nature Reserve.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:National Gallery from SW, Canberra Australia.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Gallery from SW, Canberra Australia.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:1 tianzishan wulingyuan zhangjiajie 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1 tianzishan wulingyuan zhangjiajie 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:ANZAC Parade from the Australian War Memorial, Canberra ACT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:ANZAC Parade from the Australian War Memorial, Canberra ACT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, thought you might like to know that I've added this image as picture of the day for ANZAC day in 2018. Seagull123 (talk) 23:09, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
@Seagull123: Thank you very much :) -- Thennicke (talk) 01:48, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:1 pano cuiping yangshuo 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1 pano cuiping yangshuo 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eolophus roseicapilla in flight, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volt Lane car park, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harold Mair Bridge, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CML Building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment You can remove the stain right of the tower?--Famberhorst 06:27, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
  Done -- Thennicke 06:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:35, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! QEII Square, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 06:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T&G Building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please denoise the sky much more, like this it's not a Q1 for me --Michielverbeek 07:50, 28 January 2017 (UTC)   Done -- Thennicke 05:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Like this it is looking much better --Michielverbeek 07:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Paysandisia archon MHNT Caterpillar Fronton.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paysandisia archon MHNT Caterpillar Fronton.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RegioJet class 193 Strečno.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RegioJet class 193 Strečno.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:AB BDe 4-4 Jakobsbad - Urnäsch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AB BDe 4-4 Jakobsbad - Urnäsch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DFB HG 3-4 Gletsch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Phasianus colchicus MHNT Skeleton.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phasianus colchicus MHNT Skeleton.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia surveyEdit

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dean Street pedestrian crossing, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury City Council building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A little CA, and I wish that tree was sharper, but the building is in focus and it's the subject, from a nice angle yet. --Daniel Case 05:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Matthew's Anglican Church, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment There are stitching errors: on the tower (left side), on the roof. --A.Savin 15:00, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done You have better eyes than I do :) Thanks for noticing -- Thennicke 12:42, 14 March 2017 (UTC) Looks clean now. --A.Savin 16:21, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury from Monument Hill 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice detail; I'd go for stronger contrast but I defer to your choices here --Daniel Case 05:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Entertainment Center, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:32, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regent Cinemas, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historic courthouse, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very nice compo! Good quality. --W.carter 13:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mates Building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 13:15, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! The Botanical, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Quality high enoughy for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murray Conservatorium with pedestrians, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dean Street from Monument Hill, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:05, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eucalypt and flowerbed at QEII Square, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire Station building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The image is OK but could you define the undefined category on it, please? --Basotxerri 16:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
  Done Just a misspelling :) Thanks -- Thennicke 02:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dean Street with mixed traffic, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albury Public School historic building, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK. --A.Savin 03:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House accompanying St Matthews Church, Albury NSW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
One would wish for just a little bit less exposure, but perhaps your situation dictated this --Daniel Case 02:57, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Carillon, Canberra ACT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Carillon, eastern view, daytime.


VIEdit

VI is the most important contest for wikipedia. But it is also the most subtle because choosing an image in a field of application is often a difficult exercise. We all started in this contest and my debut was very difficult. But I found competitors who had the patient to make me understand the functioning. You're going to make a long career here. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:35, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Parliament House, Canberra, at blue hour.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Gallery of Australia, main entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ANZAC Parade, Canberra, from War Memorial.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High Court of Australia, three-quarter view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:GGB Bhe 2-4 Gornergrat.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:GGB Bhe 2-4 Gornergrat.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parliament House at dusk, Canberra ACT.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --Code 04:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)   Support Well done ! --Billy69150 16:18, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boat shed and Cradle Mountain at Dove Lake, Tas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please fix the dust spots (I can see at least 2) in the middle, in a cloud very close to the top of the picture frame. Otherwise, this is at least a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 23:30, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek:
  Done -- Thennicke 23:46, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. -- Ikan Kekek 00:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waves at Hope Beach, Tas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 11:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora Australis, Hobart Tas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Looks pretty good, it just needs a bit of noise reduction.--Peulle 19:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
@Peulle:
  Done -- Thennicke 03:47, 25 April 2017 (UTC) Good Quality.--Peulle 16:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Parliament House at dusk, Canberra ACT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parliament House at dusk, Canberra ACT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Покинута обсерваторія.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Покинута обсерваторія.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:FCAB Baquedano roundhouse.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:FCAB Baquedano roundhouse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
National Library of Australia, view from north.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:90-year old Kate Carter in North Carolina log cabin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:90-year old Kate Carter in North Carolina log cabin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aurora Australis Over the Tasman Sea from SouthWest National Park.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aurora Australis Over the Tasman Sea from SouthWest National Park.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Albury railway station platform.JPGEdit

Hello! Wish you a good day! I have nominated your pic here. Hope you take some time out to take care of the members' requirements there. Thanks in advance! Nikhil (talk) 08:22, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

@Nikhilb239: Thank you for the nomination. I'll do my best to follow its progress. Do you like this station a lot? I've noticed that you nominated David's image of it as well. I am intending to get some high-quality images of the station later in the year. At the moment there is scaffolding out the front. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:33, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
@Thennicke: I am fascinated by Australia in general and trains and railway stations in particular. I was browsing through various categories of railway stations in New South Wales and yours and David's pics struck me instantly as stand out compositions. So, I have nominated them in FPC. A couple of users suggested a crop for your pic, could you please do something about it? Thanks in advance! --Nikhil (talk) 02:06, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
@Nikhilb239: This image of mine may not be up the FP standard; It is not centered and I haven't taken great care with the composition (and sharpness is bad). I've done the crop as suggested, but I would be surprised if it passes. However, as I said, I'll be getting back to this station later in the year (possibly as soon as two weeks away) to photograph it again, because it is one of the most beautiful buildings in my hometown. I will let you know when I have uploaded the new images :) And hopefully they have taken the scaffolding away! -- Thennicke (talk) 12:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Quiraing, Isle of Skye, Scotland - Diliff.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quiraing, Isle of Skye, Scotland - Diliff.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:06, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:RhB ABe 8-12 Langwieser Viaduct from Rongg.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:RhB ABe 8-12 Langwieser Viaduct from Rongg.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cap Formentor 2015 (Zuschnitt).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cap Formentor 2015 (Zuschnitt).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:PeruRail EMD GT42AC 812 at Km 99.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PeruRail EMD GT42AC 812 at Km 99.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:13, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpgEdit

Very nice edit to this image, it feels so much crisper without the haze factor. I would like to ask one thing, however. When you pull an image from a different source than what is listed on the description, please update it so folks will know where that higher resolution version came from. Thanks! Huntster (t @ c) 01:31, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

@Huntster: Thank you for the compliment - I intend to nominate it at FPC soon. Sorry about not referencing my edit. The image I worked with was File:NASA ED11-0237-18 Shuttle Carrier Aircraft.jpg, and it looks to me like both are from the same source? That despite the difference in resolution... confusing -- Thennicke (talk) 06:45, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Yes, two different sources, same image. The image that NASA used in its promotional release was somewhat size optimised to avoid minor blurring, artefacting, etc, while the image you worked on came from the Armstrong Flight Research Center's archive. Huntster (t @ c) 21:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
@Huntster: Oh, now I see - you've already updated the source, which is why I couldn't see a difference in the URL. Thank you so much; I'll make sure to check that stuff in the future -- Thennicke (talk) 00:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lindenallee entlang der Landesstraße 8128 03 2016-01 NÖ-Naturdenkmal WT-071.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lindenallee entlang der Landesstraße 8128 03 2016-01 NÖ-Naturdenkmal WT-071.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schloss Favorite Ludwigsburg 2017 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dead Horse Gap Panorama facing north-east, NSW.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dead Horse Gap Panorama facing north-east, NSW.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NASA's Shuttle Carrier Aircraft 905 (front) and 911 (rear).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:SHB-Red-Dust.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SHB-Red-Dust.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Os lencois.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Os lencois.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Airbus A350-941 F-WWCF MSN002 ILA Berlin 2016 23.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Airbus A350-941 F-WWCF MSN002 ILA Berlin 2016 23.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

WLM judgingEdit

Thank you for your comment. I did, when I got to the second round of judging, get very surprised that some pictures I knew would never have made it here as QIs, much less FPs, made it to that round.

The organizers did manage to prune out some of the sort of pictures we were going to automatically reject (i.e., pictures of plaques). But we still had a lot of well-intended phonecam pics to contend with. I really think we should have separate divisions, in all our photo contests, for phone and DSLR images. Really, a lot of the best were from people like King of Hearts and Rhododendrites who all contribute regularly at FPC (I could take some great ones myself, but I refrain from submitting since I've been on the jury the last couple of years and like doing it).

I also would like to see more people from FPC, perhaps even from outside the U.S., as judges next year, too. A set of eyes that don't see these things everyday, don't automatically invest value in pictures of the flag flying next to the new World Trade Center building, would be helpful. Daniel Case (talk) 07:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

  • @Daniel Case: That's a good idea - separate divisions for phones and DSRLs - although some phones are better than old DSLRs these days, so that needs to be accounted for. I'd like to nominate myself for judging at these kinds of events but there's no place to "sign up". Perhaps there should be a page on Commons where FPC/QI reviewers can register that they are interested in helping judge WLM. What do you think? -- Thennicke (talk) 10:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ciucaș Peak, Romania (Unsplash).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ciucaș Peak, Romania (Unsplash).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:India - Kolkata bamboo scaffolding - 3574.jpgEdit

Hi, I think you were a bit too fast with withdrawal. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:47, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

@Yann: I realise that the image would have almost certainly been promoted but I changed my mind about my own support for it, which is why I withdrew. If you're interested, the author's userpage has hundreds of street photography images of similar quality -- Thennicke (talk) 02:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:India - Kolkata electricity meters - 3832.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:India - Kolkata electricity meters - 3832.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:National Gallery at dusk, Canberra ACT.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:National Gallery at dusk, Canberra ACT.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

darktable moduleEdit

Hello,

I noticed your post on meta:2017 Community Wishlist Survey/Multimedia and Commons/Flexible use of EXIF- and IPTC-data and filenames on Uploads and wanted to let you know that at some point I was looking into whether it would be possible to upload files to Commons from darktable. I had started writing down some notes on User:Jean-Frédéric/darktable, but never dug deeper (also as it did not seem there was much interest from other Commons users).

Jean-Fred (talk) 11:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

@Jean-Frédéric:, Hi there!
I generally don't upload more than one or two images at a time, so it doesn't seem to be a hugely important software project for me, but I would probably use it if it existed.
Are you a GNOME linux user? I see you mentioned that libmediawiki is tied to the KDE/QT ecosystem, so I'm just speculating.
At this current moment I'm writing software related to the Magic Lantern Video (MLV) format, but otherwise I'd probably offer to help. It's good to see other free software users on here :)
On a related note, I'm intending to write some commons-based tutorials for darktable in the near future; I'll notify you if and when I get around to it, if you're interested. -- Thennicke (talk) 12:00, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2018, Thennicke! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 25 December 2017 (UTC)   

Christmas is all about sharing love with your loved ones. That’s why I am taking the time to share love with you and I hope to get some love back.

. --The Photographer 15:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2019! ;-)Edit

    * Happy Holidays 2019, Thennicke! *
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

-- George Chernilevsky talk 16:03, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Thennicke".