Open main menu

-- 10:54, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Contents

JugendstilEdit

Hallo Thomas, ich habe gesehen du hast einige super Jugendstilfotos hochgeladen. Hast du den Spezialpreis für Art nouvea gesehen? . Du solltest deinen Fotos die Kategorie Category:Categories containing possible art nouveau images for Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 hinzufügen. wär ja nicht schlecht, wenn der Preis nach Österreich geht :-) --gruß K@rl (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Thomas Ledl!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 01:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Robert Zeppel Sperl 2.jpgEdit

Hallo Thomas Ledl, wo genau befindet sich dieses von dir reproduzierte Gemälde? Falls du für dieses weiterhin geschützte Kunstwerk die Panoramafreiheit in Anspruch nehmen willst, musst du das in der Bildbeschreibung auch angeben. Zudem solltest du dich bei einer reinen Reproduktion nicht selbst als Autor angeben, sondern den jeweiligen Künstler. --Túrelio (talk) 09:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Ditto für File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Peter Atanasov 2.jpg, File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Peter Atanasov.jpg und File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Peter Pongratz 2.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Servus. Diese Originale hängen in den Eingangshallen zu den Wohnblöcken von Alterlaa, also allgemein zugänglich. Ich habe die restlichen 7 Bilder nun nach deinem Beispiel getagged Thomas Ledl (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

O.k. Entscheidend ist ob die hier erwähnten Bedingungen erfüllt sind; das österr. Gesetz ist da — erfreulicherweise für uns — etwas großzügiger als das deutsche. Ich habe nun noch die {{FOP}}-Vorlage hinzugefügt. --Túrelio (talk) 09:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Thomas Ledl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Your photo of LockerwieseEdit

Hi Thomas, We're interested in publishing your photograph of Lockerwiese - Anlange_Lockerwiese.jpg - in a book. Do you have a higher resolution version and would you be willing to have it published? If so, the best way to reach me is to email me at m.day(at)ramsa(dot)com, but you can also write me back here on Wikimedia. I can give you more details about the book through email and answer any questions you might have. Thanks! Margeday (talk) 22:18, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Mozarthaus Domgasse 5 Rückseite.jpgEdit

Hallo! Dieses Bild zeigt leider nicht die Rückseite des Mozarthauses, das ist das Nebenhaus (auf dem Bild links davon). Aber das macht nichts, denn das abgebildete Haus ist ebgenfalls denkmalgeschützt. Ich war so frei, die Informationen zu ändern.

Ansonsten weiter viel Vergnügen und viel Erfolg bei WLM, ein paar Bilder von dir (vor allem OÖ) habe ich auch schon in die Listen eingefügt. -- Clemens 22:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Servus.
Sowas aber auch. Dabei bin ich extra um den Häuserblock gegangen. Ich finds übrigens besser als das derzeit verwendete. Zum Ersetzen in den Listen werd ich aber voraussichtlich erst später kommen. BTW: hast du irgendein Tool mit dem man gut Fotos in Kategorien zusammenfassen kann ohne jedes einzeln angreifen zu müssen?
Einarbeiten in die Listen hab ich gesehen. Gute Arbeit! Viel Glück auch bei WLM (aber ich glaube nach wie vor dass deine Chancen was zu gewinnen mit einer anderen Kamera unendlich steigen würden) --Thomas Ledl (talk) 16:45, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Tool zum Kategorisieren von Bildern: Cat-a-lot - nicht gleich von der Bedienung abschrecken lassen, mit dem Tool musst du warm werden. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

BildklärungsfrageEdit

Hallo Thomas, das File:St_Georgen_im_Attergau_Kriegerdenkmal.JPG ist nicht der Wehrschild, sollte wohl das Kriegerdenkmal bei der Kirche sein, id: 59752. Kannst du bitte bestätigen / korrigieren. danke lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 05:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Du hast absolut recht. Habs geändert. Hab mich wohl ablenken lassen durch den Umstand, dass der gute Mann von der Atterwiki auch hier aktiv wäre wenn man ihn nur lassen würde ... --06:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Danke, das Bild war auch doppelt. Bilder sollen nicht doppelt hochgeladen werden. Mit {{rename}} kannst du eine Umbenennung eines Bildes / Kategorie initiieren. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Nun bin ich vollends verwirrt, wie das passieren konnte. Ich meinte, doppelte Fotos gar nciht hochladen zu können. Ich nehme an durch die Kennzeichnung als Duplikat wirds nun zügig gelöscht. Es wäre mir sehr recht, wenn für WLM 2013 die Einschränkung mit der Teilnahme (und damit auch dem Team-Prestige für die Gesamtanzahl) nur für September-Einsendungen fallen würde. Das würde helfen die "Pakete" klein zu halten und Fehler zu vermeiden. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 07:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Volksschule Draschestraße 2.JPGEdit

 
File:Volksschule Draschestraße 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 — billinghurst sDrewth 05:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Thomas Ledl,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:45, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

WLM BarnstarEdit

 

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!




català | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | svenska | עברית | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013!

Dear Thomas Ledl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

Your feedback will help us improve future contests!

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Public Art team
 

File:Bad Ischl Grabkapelle Brenner von Felsach.JPGEdit

Hallo!

Sag, Bist Du wirklich sicher, dass es sich dabei um eine Grabkapelle handelt? Das sieht mir eigentlich eher nach einem Verwaltungsgebäude mit Friedhofseingang aus. Ich habe das Bild jedenfalls einmal provisorisch in die Zeile des Friedhofs getan, von dem hatten wir eh noch keine vernünftige Ansicht.

Viele Grüße nach Ischl -- Clemens 19:22, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Servus.
Gern hätt ich reingeschaut aber es war zugesperrt, auch die Sebastianskapelle. Es ist auf jeden Fall das Gebäude auf den Koordinaten. Vorsicht übrigens bei der Tauberbrücke / Leharbrücke. Sehen identisch aus, musste ich grade einen rename auslösen. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Drüber ist wahrscheinlich die Witwenwohnung. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Thomas Ledl,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Thomas Ledl,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herbststraße 69.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anton-Baumgartner-Straße 119 Hannes Turba.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Josef Hel / Josef HeuEdit

Hallo Thomas, kann es sein, dass es sich bei File:Lupus_Pavillon_Skulptur_5.jpg um Josef Heu handelt? Finde keinen Hel. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Wo du recht hast hast du recht. Hab ncoh eine Großaufnahme der Gravur. Bei der rechten Hälfte vom U is ihm die Kraft ausgegangen... --Thomas Ledl (talk) 05:20, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brunn Franz Keim Gasse 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hofpavillon Hietzing renoviert 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brunn Franz Keim Gasse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Postsparkasse Otto Wagner Beamtenstiege 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Puchenau Luitgarde 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Josef (Franz) RiedlEdit

Hallo Thomas, Du hast einen Kategoriezirkelreferenz zwischen Category:Josef Riedl und Category:Josef Franz Riedl geschaffen. Wenn das dieselbe Person sein sollte, dann sollten die Kategorien zusammmengeführt werden. Falls nicht, dann verstehe ich die Zirkelreferenz nicht (Unterkategorie ist Containment, d.h. Zirkel sind nicht logisch möglich). Für Referenzen beliebiger Art gibt es {{See also cat}}. Dazu kommt, dass Josef Franz Riedl der Sohn des Holzbildhauers Josef Riedl ist, Category:Josef Riedl aber nicht nach Holzbildhauer aussieht und zwei Jahre Abstand zwischen Vater und Sohn ungewöhnlich sind :) [1] Ich schlage vor, alles nach Category:Josef Franz Riedl zu mischen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:00, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Servus Herzi Pinki.
Wie immer hast du recht. Eine Referenz zu erstellen war meine Absicht, keine Zirkelreferenz.
Ich denke auch, dass beides derselbe ist. Das cat-a-lot-Dingens verweigert mir leider weiterhin den Gehorsam. Bitte mach du!
lg, Thomas
gut, mach ich, aber nicht unter meinem Realnamen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Super! Ich bitte die Umstände zu entschuldigen und werde mich ab nun hüten wie ein Grab ;-) lg --Thomas Ledl (talk) 08:10, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

KategorisierungEdit

Hallo Thomas, sag, magst du nicht deine Bilder ein bisschen kategorisieren? Beispiele. Es ist doch einfach. Wenn es schon ein Bild zu dem Objekt gibt, Kategorien einfach kopieren und die generelle entfernen. Sollten es damit 3 oder mehr Bilder sein, diese in einer neuen Kategorie zusammenfassen und alle Individualkategorien auf die neue Kategorie schieben. Name der neuen Kategorie ergibt sich meist recht zwanglos aus den Kategorienamen für die Nachbargebäude oder vergleichbare. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Servus Herzi.
Inhaltlich bin ich absolut bei dir.
Aus praktischer Sicht gibt's zwei Möglichkeiten.
* Mehrere inhaltsähnliche Fotos mit denselben Kategorien
* Eine eigene Kategorie
In der Praxis ist die erste Version eher eine Wurschtlerei, darum Punkt 2.
Dafür sind folgende Schritte notwendig:
* Hochladen unter der neuen Kategorie.
* Das alte Bild bearbeiten und die Informationen in die Kategorie kopieren.
* In das alte Bild stattdessen die neue Kategorie eintragen.
* Ob es ev. ein zweites Bild gegeben hätte ist meines Erachtens eh nicht rauszufinden, weil https://tools.wmflabs.org/denkmalliste/index.php?action=EinzelID&ID=97677 meistens steht (den Umweg über den Toolserver empfinde ich als Wurschtlerei).
Was vergessen?
Dauert etwa 4-5 Minuten pro Bild. Ziemlich mühsam. Das muss doch knackiger gehen? Lässt sich das Kategorien anlegen nicht automatisieren? Im Prinzip so was wie "create Category from Photo"?
lg, --Thomas Ledl (talk) 15:36, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Danke für deine Unterstützung. Warum soll ich diese 4-5 Minuten pro Bild aufwenden? Weitere Bilder lassen sich über die Suche finden oder über den link (other) in der Doo-Vorlage. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
Servus. Pinki.
Aufgeschoben nicht aufgehoben, sagen alle faulen Leute ;-)
Das hier ist interessant: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Kurrentgasse_6_Ansicht_2.jpg&action=history
Kennst du das?
lg, --Thomas Ledl (talk) 07:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Hallo, kenn ich. Funktioniert verspätet und nicht vollständig (die kat ist doch nicht ausreichend). Straße, Architekt, Bauzeit, Typ des Gebäudes (z.B. Kirche) kann der Bot auch nicht erfinden. Werden die Bilder zu einem Objekt zu einer Objektkategorie zusammengefasst, dann ist die Gemeindekategorie am Bild überflüssig. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:44, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Schade. Ich bitte noch um etwas Geduld bei meinen Innenstadtfotos.
Ich lade diese Woche Fotos von bisher unfotografierten hoch. Kannst du bei denen die Kategorien übernehmen? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 19:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Göppe vs. Gröppe?Edit

Hi Thomas Ledl, Category:Kellergöppen Raab vs. Kellergröppe. Hat's einen Grund oder ist das ein Typo? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:18, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Recht hast. Gröppen muss das heißen. Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit! Kannst du's bitte umbenennen? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 08:38, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
mach ich. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 09:23, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
Besten Dank!
Alle hochgeladen. Eine fehlt (24 oder 25). Bei der Verortung ist übrigens wo ein Wurm drin. Ich bin mal so frei und betrachte das hier als Referenz bei der Beschriftung (Süden ist oben) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Raab_Erdkeller_Teilkarte.JPG --Thomas Ledl (talk) 11:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

KafkaEdit

Hi Thomas, bei dem einen Bild versteh ichs ja, beim anderen?

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Stimmt. Thx. Alles falsch. Hab die Umbenennung angestoßen.
In letzter Zeit schafft der Server es immer seltener das Vorschaubild zu generieren. Ich habe bei diesem Upload nicht gehudelt. Ich halte es daher für möglich, dass zum fehlenden Vorschaubild im Wizard auch noch die Dateinamen geändert wurden. Ich glaube, ich sehe die Problematik nicht das erste mal -> unter Beobachtung. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 16:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
Aha!, kenne den Effekt. Der UW zeigt die Vorschaubilder nur an, wenn ein einzelnes Bild hochgeladen wird, bei zwei bin ich schon unsicher und bei mehr tut er es nur noch on demand. Bei vielen Vorschaubild-Anzeigen on demand stürzt mein Browser dann oft ab. Die Bilder werden dabei nicht hinunterskaliert. D.h. 6 MByte hochladen und 6 MByte herunter (zumindest war das mal so). Und das, obwohl das Bild ja auf der lokalen Festplatte liegt. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in ÖsterreichEdit

 
... für Dein Engagement

Danke für Deine Teilnahme beim Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich. Du hast damit einen wertvollen Beitrag geleistet, Bildmaterial für die Wikipedia und für eine Weiternutzung im Sinne freien Wissens bereitzustellen. Die Jury sichtet nun in einem mehrstufigen Verfahren die Einreichungen. Die Gewinner geben wir am 30. September 2015 unter anderem auf wikilovesearth.at bekannt. Die öffentliche Preisverleihung, zu der wir Dich schon jetzt herzlich einladen, findet im November 2015 in Wien statt. Bei Fragen zum Wettbewerb schreibe bitte an info wikilovesearth.at. Der nächste große Fotowettbewerb in Österreich wird Wiki Loves Monuments im September 2015 sein.

Danke ebenso für Deine Beiträge, die Du unabhängig von Wiki Loves Earth leistest. Solltest Du bei Deinen Fotounternehmungen Unterstützung benötigen, kannst Du Dich jederzeit an den österreichischen Förderverein Wikimedia Österreich wenden (eine Vereinsmitgliedschaft ist keine Voraussetzung). Zu den Serviceangeboten für ehrenamtliche Fotografinnen und Fotografen gehören ein Pool an Fotoequipment, die Organisation von Fotoakkreditierungen, Reisekostenerstattungen sowie E-Mail-Adressen und Visitenkarten. Wikimedia Österreich kannst Du über verein wikimedia.at kontaktieren.

--Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk)  14:49, 3 Jul 2015 (UTC)  > für das Team von Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich

Die Preisträger stehen festEdit

Die Jury hat entschieden - die zehn Preisträger von Wiki Loves Earth 2015 in Österreich findest Du hier: http://wikilovesearth.at/gewinner-wle-2015/. In dieser Endauswahl ist leider kein Bild von Dir vertreten. Unter den 500 Fotos, die von der Vorjury für die engere Auswahl vorgesehen wurden, ist ein Bild von Dir: http://wikilovesearth.at/tools/vorjury/index_2015.html. Noch bis 30. September gibt es die Möglichkeit am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments rund um denkmalgeschützte Bauwerke teilzunehmen. --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Einladung für den Jahreskalender 2016Edit

Hallo, ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein Fotos (von dir) für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2016 von Wikimedia Österreich zu nominieren, die 2015 hochgeladen und mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet wurden. Gruß --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Gratulation!Edit

 
... fürs Mitmachen!

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 in Österreich - und herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Foto File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpg hat Platz 8 gewonnen und dein Foto File:Mauterner Brücke Ansicht 1.JPG gehört zu den 40 Fotos, die ex aequo Platz 11 belegen. Insgesamt wurden dieses Jahr 7757 Fotos eingereicht. Die Liste der Preisträger findest du hier: http://wikilovesmonuments.at/2015/11/04/gewinner-wiki-loves-monuments-2015-oesterreich/.

Wir würden uns sehr freuen, wenn du persönlich an der Preisverleihung teilnehmen kannst, die am 9. Dezember 2015 um 17 Uhr in der Wiener Hofburg stattfindet. Wir werden dich diesbezüglich noch per E-Mail kontaktieren.

Für das Team von Wiki Loves Monuments in Österreich - liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Opernpassage Panorama.jpgEdit

Hi, ich will das Review nicht weiter aufblähen, aber ein weißer Klotz ist da noch (bei x=11976 y=4044). Danke. --Magnus (talk) 11:17, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

du hast absolut recht. thx. habs behoben (und dabei noch zwei weitere und zwei stitchkanten gefunden). und danke für die promotion.
noch als frage: gibts da ein tool mit dem man die QI-Seite etwas weniger umständlich (quelltext) bearbeiten kann? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 12:04, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Mir ist nichts bekannt. --Magnus (talk) 12:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Opernpassage Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Nähere Infos?Edit

Hi Thomas. Alles Gute für 2016! Hast du vielleicht nähere Infos zu diesen Bildern? Künstler? Dargestellte Figur? Baujahr?

lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Servus Herzi Pinki.
Danke sehr. Dir auch ein gutes neues. Ich hoffe du hast dich schon angemeldet!!!1!
Leider nein. Die Objekte sind nicht beschriftet, noch habe ich etwas im Internet gefunden. Man kann wohl sagen, dass diese drei Objekte zwischen 1905 und 1910 geschaffen wurden, doch in Wirklichkeit ist das Spekulation. Ich könnte auch sagen, das ist ein Apoll von Adolf Wagner von der Mühl, aber wissen du ich's nicht. Und wenn ich mir das http://www.linz.at/archiv/denkmal/default.asp?action=denkmaldetail&id=2643 anschau, dann können die Statuen auch ein Stilmix sein. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 09:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2016Edit

Servus Thomas Ledl,

Am Sonntag, den 1. Mai 2016 startete zum dritten Mal der Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth in Österreich.
Wir laden dich herzlich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mit Fotos von Naturdenkmälern und weiteren unter Naturschutz stehenden Objekten aus Österreich teilzunehmen. Der Zeitraum, in dem die Bilder auf Wikimedia Commons hochgeladen werden sollen, läuft bis 31. Mai 2016.
Alle Informationen findest du hier: https://wikilovesearth.at/.

Zusätzlich wollen wir dich dazu einladen, als Mitglied der Vorjury die diesjährigen Beiträge zu begutachten: Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Earth 2016/Österreich/Jury. Du kannst bei der Vorjury auch mitmachen, wenn du selbst am Fotowettbewerb teilnimmst. Deine eigenen Fotos werden dir dann nicht zur Bewertung vorgelegt.
Bitte melde dich zur Vorjury an. Der Bewertungszeitraum liegt zwischen 15. Mai und 15. Juni 2016. Jede Stimme ist willkommen. Liebe Grüße im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Agruwie  Disk    15:07, 5 May 2016 (CET)

brutalist metro stations in ViennaEdit

Servus! Bist du dir sicher, dass die U-Bahn-Station Messe-Prater dem Brutalismus zuzuordnen ist? Falls ja trifft dies wohl auf alle U2-Stationen der dritten und vierten Ausbaustufe zu.    FDMS  4    18:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

 
Rolltreppen U2 Schottenring DSC06755
Ja schon und ja, stimmt. Die meisten U2-Stationen kenn ich nicht so gut. Ich kann nur für Praterstern und für Schottentor sprechen, die durchwegs mit Sichtbeton gestaltet sind, der über einen reinen Zweckbau hinausgehen. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Danke für deine Teilnahme bei Wiki Loves Earth 2016 in ÖsterreichEdit

Die Jury bewertet nun alle eingereichten Fotos. Die Preisträger geben wir am 31. Juli 2016 auf der Website wikilovesearth.at bekannt.

Bei dieser Gelegenheit möchte ich dich an die WikiCon 2016 Mitte September erinnern, für die noch bis 30. Juni Programmvorschläge eingereicht werden können. Wikimedia Österreich wird wieder Stipendien für die Teilnahme zur Verfügung stellen, genauere Infos veröffentlichen wir Ende Juni. Bei Fragen dazu kannst du dich gerne an uns wenden: verein@wikimedia.at. Liebe Grüße --Annemarie Buchmann (WMAT) (talk) 13:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

keine gute ideeEdit

das da ist keine gute Idee. Immerhin änderst du damit die Bilder an zwei Stellen in der WP und an allen Stellen, wo das Bild ev. extern eingebunden ist. Wenn es nicht um Staubflecken oder Rahmen oder Drehreste geht (Q des Bildes) würde ich in solchen Fällen lieber unter neuen Namen hochladen und die Files an den Verwendungsstellen explizit ersetzen. Rückgängig geht über Commons:History merging and splitting/Requests. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in DeutschlandEdit

Hallo Thomas Ledl!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

Hallo, ...Edit

mit fremden Federn sich schmücken und das wegen zwei Fotos: [2]. Bwag (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Wovon sprichst du? Dass du selbst zu faul warst die Kategorie anzulegen und jetzt neidisch bist? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 06:48, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ~ Rob13Talk 16:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Reminder: Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2016 is open!Edit

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2016 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Thomas Ledl,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2016 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eleventh edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2016) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 20 April 2017, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
--Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 08:43, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Karl Marx Hof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reumannhof, Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Metzleinstaler Hof, Wien 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Herweghhof, Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fillgraderstiege, Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Altes Rathaus, Wien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Wohnpark Alterlaa Dachblick von Block C1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Döbling Hochschule für Welthandel Detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecatedEdit

Hello Thomas Ledl, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue Church, Bratislava 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Upside down Pyramid, Bratislava 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Hetzendorf 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Apotheke zum weißen Engel, Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kaiser Franz Denkmal, Hofburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tiertränkebrunnen, Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Otto Wagner Postsparkasse Hauptfront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Breitenfelder Pfarrkirche Portalansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ankeruhr, Hoher Markt, Vienna.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dragons Bridge, Ljubljana 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Unterach_Ehem._Gasthaus_Goldenes_Schiff.JPGEdit

Hier handelt es sich um den Goldenen Anker (nicht denkmalgeschützt). Habe in der Denkmalliste das Bild gegen das Goldene Schiff getauscht. --FHbaum (talk) 12:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Besten Dank! lg, --Thomas Ledl (talk) 13:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stift Melk, Westansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Danke für die Teilnahme bei WikiDaheim 2017 in Österreich!Edit

Hallo Thomas Ledl!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 7.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Ort in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinem möglich war.

Die 561 besten Bilder wurden in den letzten Wochen von einer Vorjury ausgesucht, die Du dir hier anschauen kannst - vielleicht sind auch Bilder von Dir dabei! :-) Eine Jury wird nun bis Mitte November die zehn besten Bilder aussuchen, die Preisträger werden danach von uns verständigt.

Nochmals vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Wir würden uns freuen, wenn Du auch in Zukunft die Wikimedia-Projekte bebilderst! Im 2. Halbjahr 2018 wird WikiDaheim wahrscheinlich wieder stattfinden - wir würden uns freuen, wenn du dann wieder dabei wärst :-) Solltest Du Fragen haben, so kannst Du Dich gerne an wikidaheim wikimedia.at wenden.

(Braveheart für das Team von WikiDaheim, 11:47, 2. Nov 2017 (UTC))

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Platz 4 beim Fotowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017!Edit

Hallo Thomas!

Du hast mit File:ÖAMTC-Zentrale, Innenansicht 1.jpg Platz 4 beim Fottowettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2017 belegt. Du wirst bezüglich des Preises noch extra von Wikimedia Österreich verständigt. Herzlichen Glückwunsch! LG, Braveheart (talk) 21:32, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stadtbahnstation Oberdöbling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Picture requestEdit

Hi Thomas, It will be fun for me, I will do my best to assit you, but please be pattient, I have limitations on time and technical skills, What is your request? --Cvmontuy (talk) 13:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Carlos. Great!
My request is for en:Old Portal de Mercaderes (Mexico City). It is the Grand Hotel now. Especially the hall and the elevator where we only have blurred images in Wikipedia so far. I believe it might be hard to shoot. Have you done interior shooting with dynamic range issues before?
It was in the James Bond Spectre opening scene. This is definitely a "featured image-target". I'm a big Art Nouveau fan but I missed it in Wikimania 2015. --Thomas Ledl (talk) 13:57, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, In the next two weeks I'll find a time window to go to the place, but I don´t know if the security personal is going to allow me to take pictures inside, in other private buildings is prohibited, but I am going to try, What do you think of me taking two expositions and then merge the two pictures to get a HDR, I have a Nikon D7200 and Nikkor 50 mm lens and a Sam Yang 14 mm (this one has small hole on the center of the lens surface), but lets see what we get with this. regards --Cvmontuy (talk) 17:17, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
@Cvmontuy Great! Well, being sent away is something that always can happen. At hotels they are usually photographers friendly as long as you are respectful to the staff and none of the guests complains. It's good to wear a shirt, business look, walking upright, confident, not being stressed.
Technically: I believe this is the best composition for the hall (of course feel free to experiment): http://intotheunknown.bplaced.net/diary/10_06_04_09/data/images/mexicocity_556.jpg This picture shows dynamic range issues so it's probably best to enable bracketing, eventually use a baby tripod. If the wide angle lens is not wide enough (which I believe it is) I usually take 3 or 5 upright photos beside each other and stitch it. I can do the photoshop for you if you send me the raw.
Have fun and thanks in advance! best, --Thomas Ledl (talk) 22:39, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi Thomas, Yesterday I was at the Hotel, it was a nice experience I like the place a lot. I have the opportunity to take some shots with my Samyang 14 mm, before the security personal told me that only pictures with cellular are allowed, as the hotel sells a special authorization to take pictures with what they call "professional cameras", this week I am going to call to ask what is the cost for this "authorization", I have uploaded this File:GranHotelDeLaCiudadDeMexico201712.jpg, next week I going to try to upload a new one but is very similar, regards --Cvmontuy (talk) 16:16, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Hey @Cvmontuy. This is the first pic also showing the ground floor. Great! Such a beautiful building. It's a pity they want to charge. Let's hope it's affordable. I won a small price in the local Wikipedia photo contest and I'm willing to share with you for a perfect shot (the rights remain with you, of course). Let me know their price.
Technically there is already a lot done right. Aperture is closed, using a tripod, time of day looks good, not too crowded. Quite sharp. Lens looks ok (I don't see a hole in the center). As foreseen the ceiling is a little bit overexposed. Shooting indoor is always way harder than outdoors. Go for the bracketing! --Thomas Ledl (talk) 17:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments, any advice is welcome as I would like to improve my skills, I'll let you know any progress on the authorization to take more shots, regards --Cvmontuy (talk) 19:49, 4 December 2017 (UTC).
Hi, they charge about 900 usd dollars per photographic session, even half the price is too much for me, I told the sales person that this is for the wikipedia a non profit organization and they told me that is a corporate policy and they can not change it. regards, --Cvmontuy (talk) 23:19, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded a couple more of pictures: File:GranHotelCiudadDeMexico201712p2.jpg and File:GranHotelCiudadDeMexico201712p3.jpg I would love to take more pictures of this place my next move will be to write to its marketing department and offer free content about this place on Wikipedia, lets see what they said in exchange for the authorization to take more shots, regards, --Cvmontuy (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
@Cvmontuy Well 900USD is a joke. I never saw this kind of spirit with hotels.
Can you contact me by mail: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spezial:E-Mail_senden/Thomas_Ledl ? --Thomas Ledl (talk) 10:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

SchuleEdit

Category:Schottenfelder_Realschule ist schon erledigt. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Marienstatue Bled.jpgEdit

 
File:Marienstatue Bled.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Kriegerdenkmal, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Kriegerdenkmal, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 18:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Denkmal der französischen Revolution und der Illyrischen Provinzen, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Denkmal der französischen Revolution und der Illyrischen Provinzen, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 17:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jugendstilhörsaal, MedUni Wien.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jugendstilhörsaal, MedUni Wien.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jugendstilhörsaal, MedUni Wien.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 12:30, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Peter Pongratz 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Alterlaa Kunst am Bau Peter Pongratz 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Regasterios (talk) 09:09, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Museum für angewandte Kunst, Innenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

WMAT-Jahreskalender 2019Edit

Hallo Thomas,
ich lade dich hiermit herzlich dazu ein, eine Auswahl Deiner Fotos, die Du ab 1. November 2017 hochgeladen hast und die mit {{Supported by Wikimedia Österreich}} gekennzeichnet sind, für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2019 von Wikimedia Österreich vorzuschlagen. Nominierungsschluss ist Sonntag, 4. November 2018. Liebe Grüße, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 23:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Basilika Mondsee 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation!Edit

Hallo Thomas!

Vielen Dank für Deine Teilnahme am Wettbewerb zu WikiDaheim 2018! Von Ende Juli bis Anfang Oktober wurden so insgesamt mehr als 14.000 Bilder hochgeladen und viele Orte in Österreich in der Wikipedia und anderen Projekten mit neuen Bildern versehen, was nur dank der vielen Beiträge wie Deinen möglich war.

Aus rund 500 von der Vorjury ausgewählten Bildern hat nun eine Jury die Preisträger dieses Jahres gewählt und so haben wir die Freude, Dir zum 7. Platz in der Gesamtwertung und zum 1. in der Kategorie Kunst im öffentlichen Raum zu gratulieren!

Du erhältst von mir ein E-Mail mit Details zur Preisvergabe.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 17:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

WikiDaheim 2018 – Gratulation, die Zweite!Edit

Hallo Thomas Ledl!
nachdem auch die Jury des Bundesdenkmalamtes ihre Preisträger für mehrere Themenkategorien gewählt hat haben wir die Freude, Dir noch einmal zu gratulieren — und das gleich doppelt: Zum 2. Platz in der Kategorie Innenaufnahmen für File:Museum für angewandte Kunst, Innenhof.jpg und zum 4. Platz zum Tag des Denkmals mit File:Palais Niederösterreich Stiegenhaus.jpg. Deine Preise, als kleine Anerkennung, würden wir Dir gerne bei der WikiDaheim-Preisvergabe überreichen.

Mit herzlichem Gruß, für das Team von WikiDaheim, --Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Your best shot 2018Edit

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

I'm wishing you all the best for the New Year and I hope you're going to have many memorable photo opportunities in 2019. With 2018 coming to an end, it's time to look back at the past 12 months. I'm curious – what would you consider your best shot of 2018 and why? I invite you to share your image and your thoughts in order to provide others with the opportunity to celebrate, learn, and enjoy:

Your best shot 2018

Thanks for all your effort in sharing your vision of the world with others under a free license!

Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Doblhoffgasse 7Edit

Hallo Thomas, könntest du mir bitte, wenn die Baustelle vor dem Gebäude beseitigt ist, ein schönes frondseitiges Fassadenfoto schiessen? Das Neurenaissance-Gebäude hat mir sehr gut gefallen und hat mir geschmerzt dass ich es nur so aufnehmen hatte können.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 06:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)  

Hallo @Ricardalovesmonuments:
Das ist was ich grundsätzlich mache. Bis ich mit Wien fertig bin wird bedauerlicherweise noch unendlich viel Zeit vergehen. Zu groß. Daher wenn dann immer gleich systematisch. Weil wenn mir ein Gebäude eines Architekten gefällt ist es wahrscheinlich, dass mir auch andere von ihm gefallen. Jegliche Hilfe ist daher mehr als willkommen.
Zur Doblhoffgasse finde ich mal zunächst über AZW diesen Architekten: de:Bernhard Freudenberg: http://www.architektenlexikon.at/de/1064.htm . Über diese Liste komme ich auch zu de:Josef Hudetz http://www.architektenlexikon.at/de/248.htm . Ich hab mal hier de:Diskussion:Josef_Hudetz das was ich als Basis verwende reingepastet. Die Aufgabe ist im Großen und Ganzen wie bei den Denkmallisten die Zusammenführung von Daten (Sammeleinträge teilen, bereits vorhandene Bilder eintragen, Wikidata-Objekte eintragen, Koordinaten eintragen). Könntest du dir vorstellen da mitzuhelfen? lg --Thomas Ledl (talk) 08:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Du sollst mir das Haus fotografieren, damit ich auch ein Bild hat das nicht so verstellt ist.--Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 11:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Flowerstore, market, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Flowerstore, market, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Fountain Nazorjeva Trg, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Fountain Nazorjeva Trg, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Pyramid, Zois Street, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Pyramid, Zois Street, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:27, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Tabakkiosk, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Tabakkiosk, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:51, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Krizanke, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Krizanke, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:54, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Peglezen, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Peglezen, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 13:56, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 13:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 14:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Roman Wall, Ljubljana 2.jpgEdit

 
File:Roman Wall, Ljubljana 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 14:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Roman Wall, Ljubljana 1.jpgEdit

 
File:Roman Wall, Ljubljana 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 14:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Tivoli-Park, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Tivoli-Park, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 14:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

File:Villa Prelovsek, Ljubljana.jpgEdit

 
File:Villa Prelovsek, Ljubljana.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 14:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 15:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 19:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!Edit

Dear Thomas Ledl,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Thomas Ledl".