Open main menu

Emblem-important.svg This is an archive of User talk:Trijnstel


Year of buildEdit

Hi Trijnstel, we use Category 1989 ships for this vessel in Wikipedia (launched in 1989), but here in Wikimedia always year of build

2.The general format for category titles is "<name of ship> (ship, <year>)". <year> is the year the ship was completed,... 

regards,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 17:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Ahhh, so I wasn't wrong in thinking that we used the launch date, but apparantly that's only on Wikipedia. Thanks for explaining! Trijnsteltalk 17:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Troll sockEdit

Revision of User:Flawed diamond evidences for this identification? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:37, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, Revision of User talk:Rodhullandemu and attacks against A.Savin are IMHO sufficient. You may leave it without reply now. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 11:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
@Incnis Mrsi: Plus my checkuser tools are helpful here. Trijnsteltalk 11:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

BTW your “checkuser tools” would be much appreciated here currently. Can you—please—make at least limited check for the Bill Wong’s case? If he is a person making few throw-away socks to deceive community surveillance, then it IMHO doesn’t worth banishment from the site (although is definitely a breach of policy). But only indefblock may be a solution in the case if Bill is an elite sock from the known farm. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Gerardus Mooijman (1943).jpgEdit

File:Gerardus Mooijman (1943).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk page revertEdit

Hi! I thought I was still on the IP-talk.   Thanks for your revert. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

No problem.   Trijnsteltalk 22:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Trijnstel/Archive/2018".