Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tsaag Valren!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | অসমীয়া | asturianu | azərbaycanca | تۆرکجه | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | भोजपुरी | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | català | нохчийн | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | euskara | estremeñu | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | galego | עברית | हिन्दी | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Ирон | polski | português | português do Brasil | rumantsch | română | русский | sicilianu | Scots | سنڌي | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | සිංහල | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | тоҷикӣ | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | українська | اردو | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 粵語 | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  íslenska  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello, Tsaag Valren!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


LicencesEdit

Bonjour,

J'ai noté une certaine confusion sur les licences dans les images que tu importais :

  • Les œuvres d'art bidimensionnelles anciennes (toiles et illustrations tombées dans le domaine public) doivent généralement être marquées avec la licence PD-art et non PD-old (à moins d'être soi-même l'auteur du cliché ou que celui-ci soit très ancien).
  • Les œuvres d'art tridimensionnelles anciennes (sculptures, poteries... tombées dans le domaine public) ne peuvent être importées sur Commons que si (et seulement si) tu es l'auteur du cliché, auquel cas tu peux choisir la license de ton choix.

Certaines des images que tu as importées ont été supprimées pour respecter le second point.

Bonne continuation. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

... Je ne savais pas, et mes articles ne valent plus le BA maintenant. Comment pourrai-je aller prendre en photo des poteries qui se trouvent à l'autre bout du monde ?
Vais faire une demande pour re-illustrer Hippalektryon mais je prendrai très mal qu'on me retire le BA à cause de celà, vu tout le travail que j'ai fourni dessus...
Les difficultés d'illustration sont un des problèmes courants de WP.
Sans aller jusqu'au bout du monde, on trouve une référence intéressante sur le CVA : Musée Vivenel de Compiègne, kyathos à fond blanc de Psiax montrant un hippalectryon (Inv. 1073).
Heureusement, le domaine de la Grèce antique est un des mieux couverts sur Commons, avec un petit groupe de voyageurs qui ratissent de nombreux musées. J'ai ainsi pu retrouver une photo d'hippalectryon dans mon stock berlinois : File:Xenokles lip cup hippalektryon Antikensammlung Berlin.jpg. C'est un peu bruité, mais ça reste pas mal.
Vu qu'il y a une figurine au Louvre, on peut aussi demander à Jastrow qui est la spécialiste du musée. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Shagya ArabianEdit

Bonjour,

Je suis obligé de signaler une absence de permission sur les photos dont Véronique Mestre Gibaud est l'auteur puisqu'il n'y pas d'autorisation claire pour le moment. Il va de soit que je remplacerai ce modèle par la confirmation OTRS lorsqu'un courriel correct aura été envoyé.

Attention toutefois : tu as mis une licence qui est différente de celle évoquée par Véronique Mestre Gibaud dans son courriel. Si elle confirme qu'elle place ses images sous GFDL, il faudra donc en plus changer toutes les licences, ce qui représente du boulot supplémentaire pour l'équipe OTRS ;) Fais bien attention la prochaine fois !--Bapti 06:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Désolée, c'est la première fois que je traite une autorisation de republication, je ne savais pas...
Pas de problème, mais ne remets pas {{OTRS pending}} alors qu'il n'y a plus d'autorisation en attente sur OTRS, l'autorisation fournie n'ayant pu être être validée ;)--Bapti 21:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
J'attends que la personne concernée revalide l'autorisation comme il faut, en espérant que toutes ces photos ne seront pas supprimées car ça me ferait vraiment **** avec la labellisation BA de l'article en cours et le temps que j'ai prit à les ajouter...
Bonjour,
Ouf, les images ont été confirmées ;)
Par contre, il y a un problème avec le champ date dans le modèle {{Information}} (à rédiger sous la forme AAAA-MM-JJ) : il est toujours rempli avec 2009 alors que les métadonnées indiquent une date plus précise (exemple : File:Babolna-2-shagya.JPG#Métadonnées). Ça serait parfait de corriger ça quand tu auras le temps ;)--Bapti 21:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Attention : il faut bien écrire la date au format AAAA-MM-JJ (donc "2008-08" et non "2008/08"). Cela permet d'afficher automatiquement la date dans la langue de l'utilisateur (ici, tu lis "août 2009" si ton interface est configurée en anglais.--Bapti 09:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Ha d'accord !--Tsaag Valren (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Lutin by godo.jpgEdit

Hi, i saw your message on the talkpage of the above image. Can you ask the author to send an email to OTRS (see COM:OTRS for a template) to confirm the license on the image? It's an absolutely wonderful drawing! Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I have asked another user to help you, but in the meantime, perhaps Commons:OTRS/fr will help. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Utopiales 2011Edit

Salut Tsaag Valren, je ai vu que tu as commencé a mettre en ligne tes photos des Utopiales, et c'est vraiment sympa. Par contre, je trouve dommage que tu laisses la date en watermark sur la photo alors que tes photos numériques contiennent déjà la date de prise de vue dans les métadonnées. Je suppose que c'est un réglage de ton appareil numérique, après ce sont tes photos et c'est donc ton choix, mais sur Commons en général on préfère les photos sans watermark. Il y a une explication en anglais par ici COM:Watermarks#Timestamps (ce n'est pas encore une recommandation, mais l'idée y est).

Bonne continuation, PierreSelim (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Cheval en QI ?Edit

Bonjour,

J'ai vu les images que tu demandes de proposer au label "images de qualité", et je les ai toutes regardées. Certaines ne correspondent pas aux critères factuels exigés (taille minimum, réalisées par un "wikimédien" etc...), et les autres ont toute un problème de qualité technique (surexposition, cadrage, netteté, pixellisation etc...) qui je le crains ne leur permettrait pas de passer la barre. En revanche, l'une d'entre elles est très séduisante et remplit tous les critères, au point que je l'ai proposée non pas en "image de qualité", mais carrément en "images remarquables", c'est celle-ci. J'espère qu'elle aura du succès (mais ce n'est pas sûr, les "reviewers" sont très exigeants). Il lui faudra au moins 7 votes positifs, et moins de la moitié de votes négatifs pour réussir à franchir cet obstacle très difficile !!
Je suis allé sur la page de la galerie de photos du portail du cheval, et j'ai vu plusieurs de mes "oeuvres". J'en ai rajouté quelques autres de mon cru, toutes déjà primées soit en image de qualité, soit en images de valeur, soit les deux. J'espère que je ne me suis pas trompé dans les numéros.
Deux de mes enfants montent, et je suis donc intéressé par le sujet, même si moi je n'y connais rien...
Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Foto sprong sloot.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foto sprong sloot.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Et voilà, ça a marché !--Jebulon (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

For future reference...Edit

All but one of your Quality Image candidate proposals were ineligible for QI status. A number were overexposed, and most of the rest were not by Wikimedia contributors. --Pitke (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)


Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Tsaag Valren,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Flickr uploadsEdit

In future when uploading Flickr images please provide a unique url for each and every image. You gave an album url for all your images which can be rather time consuming to find the image in question and may not remain valid especially if the Flickr user adds images to that album. Had you provided the proper url a bot could have automatically reviewed the images and passed them. That would have saved us volunteer reviewers quite a bit of time. I think I fixed all of your recent uploads but you should check them anyway just to see what type of url is actually needed. Nice images thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


File:Shalihotra manuscript pages.jpgEdit

Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  português  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  日本語  +/−


 
Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Shalihotra manuscript pages.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sainte Onenne recevant le baiser de la vierge.JPGEdit

 
File:Sainte Onenne recevant le baiser de la vierge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Cartoons in French about autismEdit

Bravo pour ces dessins, c'est tout à fait brillant, didactique, utile et agréable à lire. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Merci pour cet avis ! --Tsaag Valren (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Photos du concours d'attelageEdit

Salut Tsaag. Les photos du concours d'attelage sont en ligne dans la catégorie Category:Concours national Élite Rennes 2016. Je te laisse le soin de les catégoriser et de les décrire plus finement :-) --EdouardHue (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Fringilla coelebs coelebs Josselin 14.jpgEdit

Bonjour, Merci pour ta nomination. J'aime la composition et les couleurs, mais la qualité n'est pas au niveau des images remarquables. Désolé, et ne te décourage pas ! Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Merci Yann ǃ Je met des clichés sur Commons depuis assez peu de temps, aussi, j'étais intéressée par le feedback pour savoir comment améliorer le truc. Merci pour ce commentaire. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 11:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
Bien que la majorité des images avec le statut FP soient prises avec un réflex, il est quand même possible d'en obtenir avec un bridge comme le tien. Tu devrais essayer sur COM:QI pour commencer, c'est plus facile. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Merci pour le conseil Yann, je ne savais pas que le niveau COM:QI était plus simple. Je vais essayer pour voir. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 13:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
La qualité demandée est quasiment la même, mais la photo n'a pas besoin d'être extraordinaire. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

CategoryːBois d'AmourEdit

Hi, the problem is that you use some look-alike symbol instead of ':' - Jcb (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Cheval de PrzewalskiEdit

Bonjour, Tu seras peut-être intéressée par File:Przewalski's Horse (02710137).jpg, qui est plutôt de bonne qualité. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poules en bio à Bailleul-Neuville 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
This one is sharp and good developed, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --PumpkinSky 19:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Myocastor coypus L'Isle-Adam 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
It is a pity. But I think that the shadow due to the blinders is too harsh. -- Spurzem 18:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
@Tsaag Valren: Could you try to tone down the highlights and tone up the shadows? I think this can be OK after some small fixes. --Basotxerri 09:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
@Basotxerri: Sadly I don't know how to do that... is there a tutorial ?
OK, I see that you've shot the picture using a predefined camera program. If your intention is to be a more (or less) serious photographer I recommend to shoot RAW files and process them in an adecuate program like Lightroom. If you prefer to use a free program like GIMP, I've found these instructions: [[1]] --Basotxerri 20:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)<bɾ/>@Basotxerri: Thanks for tips ː I've done this with GIMP. --Tsaag Valren 15:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
But don't forget that image manipulation on RAW files gives always better results. Much better now! For me it's OK and I suppose that Spurzem agrees. --Basotxerri 18:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black carriage horse head in Chania, Creta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Shame about the lamp post though. --W.carter 20:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --W.carter 10:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool bit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Course trotteurs Saint-Jean-des-Prés (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 12:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin Normande portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Capricorn4049 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Asperger's Are Us in 2011.jpgEdit

 
File:Asperger's Are Us in 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beaten man (talk) 06:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chèvre naine - Sérent 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ --Palauenc05 22:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chèvre naine - Sérent 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Detailed enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brussels tram line 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lion and Small Goat by Charles Samuël - Close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serpent and Caiman by Émile Namur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Could you crop the bottom of the photography, it would be better. Thanks. --PJDespa 10:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)   Done --Tsaag Valren 13:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
  Support Good quality now IMO --PJDespa 17:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gunnera manicata bourgeon et inflorescence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Eiffel Jumping 2018 - Sergio Alvarez Moya et Carlo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Peulle 21:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Necrosyrtes monachus head, Josselin, Brittany, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Les Derniers Trouvères - Marie Milliflore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

OsloEdit

Bonjour Tsaag Valren, je viens vers toi pour les photos de ton chat. Il est catégorisé comme "European shorthair". European shorthair est une race de chats qui est très souvent confondue avec le chat de maison (chat de gouttière), qui lui est juste un chat sans race (voir l'article Wikipédia). Du coup, ton chat Oslo, c'est un chat que tu as acheté chez un éleveur ou c'est juste un chat de gouttière ? Amicalement, --Abujoy (talk) 16:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

C'est un chat de gouttière, issu d'un mâle errant. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Merci ! Je décatégorise, histoire d'éviter d'avoir une illustration au mauvais endroit. Bonne journée. --Abujoy (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jument boulonnaise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality, slight CA on top of his head but barely noticeable, I think the picture would look better with a slight crop of the bottom. --Trougnouf 19:27, 16 October 2018 (UTC) I've cropped 100 px on the bottom --Tsaag Valren 21:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Coq Sebright - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tête jument boulonnaise 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Good quality but the background could use some denoising --Trougnouf 19:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)   Comment Noise reduction applied on background --Tsaag Valren 20:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
  Support It's much better. You've applied a drawn mask which takes more effort on your part and leaves the area around your drawn edges visibly noisy, a parametric mask would work out better. --Trougnouf 23:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cane colvert - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naro, blue-eyed cross-siamese cat, at Josselin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Airedale terrier head, Josselin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 21:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pica pica - Jardin des plantes de Nantes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin pis Pie Rouge des Plaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
More details than expected ;-) Good Quality --PtrQs 14:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poule Sebright - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Camille renversade.jpgEdit

 
File:Camille renversade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.190.190.71 11:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artifices on a chestnut French Trotter horse, Guillac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. But please work on the description a bit: add English description if you can, geo code and a place where it was taken --Podzemnik 21:19, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chestnut French Trotter horse head, Guillac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:10, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blackstorm Basloir at Guillac.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fidji d'Ourville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good Quality --Axel Tschentscher 18:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attache de langue galopeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prix Charles Philippe 2019 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 08:59, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Attelage jument percheronnes Josselin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality though the crop at the right is a bit disturbing. -- Spurzem 21:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prix Charles Philippe 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --SH6188 07:53, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
Merci Amélie pour les précisions apportées à mes photos de chevaux. Je ne connais pas grand chose à l'informatique et encore moins aux chevaux.

Alain

Céléda (talk) 12:22, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Comme j'ai vu votre intérêt pour les chevaux de trait, j'ai partagé une quinzaine de photos que vous pouvez retrouver dans les catégories DRAFT HORSES ou MIRABEL (Ardèche) Amicalement Alain, pseudo : celeda Céléda (talk) 17:26, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Automne, Pony racing, Rennes 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Stepro 01:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Prix amateur Rennes 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Seven Pandas 00:00, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cob normand hennissant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bricole et sellette.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file moversEdit

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hugo Horiot 2.jpgEdit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hugo Horiot 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hugo Horiot 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ganímedes (talk) 11:04, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Races de chevaux Haras Hennebont.jpgEdit

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Races de chevaux Haras Hennebont.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

— Racconish💬 16:40, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Franchement, ça ressemble bien assez à une planche XIXe pour présumer domaine public... enfin, la photo est floue de toutes façon, supprimez su vous voulez, m'en fiche... --Tsaag Valren (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
@Racconish: j'ai restauré ce fichier qui est clairement dans le domaine public. Une bien meilleure version est disponible sur Gallica : ici si tu veux l'importer (en indiquant bien la bonne licence et information cette fois ;) ). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tête hyène rayée - Tozeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:16, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chèvre de Tozeur 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Queue fine de l'Ouest Tozeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 10:41, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden statue Ibn Chabbat Tozeur (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 19:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevreau de Tozeur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Junior Jumper 05:52, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevreau de Tozeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Minaret Sidi Aabid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arabe-barbe mangeant des dattes séchées.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:47, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bled el Hadhar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:57, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hippomobile Tozeur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Briqueterie de Tozeur 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jarres Bled el Hadhar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:11, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Akhal Teke Stallion - Murmansk.jpgEdit

 
File:Akhal Teke Stallion - Murmansk.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:11, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Caspian Stallion grey.jpgEdit

 
File:Caspian Stallion grey.jpg has been marked for speedy deletions (reason : I no longer want my photos in wikimedia commons. I didn't understand the ramifications of my work being used, worldwide without my specifc permission. I was deeply depressed when I OK'd the photos and I do not have proper releases for the photos I took. I also realize now that it was a mistake to allow photos of my son or family and friends in wikimedia commons. I've also been contacted by horse owners over the years that are unhappy about their photos being in wikimedia and I'm worried about being sued ), Wikimedia commons doesn't permit uploading personal files/copyright violations,spams and files without a source/license. If you continue to upload similar files you may have to face some strict administrative actions. Please act wisely!

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

Nominated for deletion by Abounaderphoto. I am a software, please do not ask me questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 07:12, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prix Josselin de Rohan 2019 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prix Josselin de Rohan 2019 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Although the image shows an animal cruelty, the photo is good. -- Spurzem 08:13, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mouse dun pony 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:53, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Breton x Comtois mare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Celeda 14:20, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! French bulldog head, Josselin 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality., damage to the leash --Celeda 17:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poule pondeuse de Cruguel 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice shot! --Kritzolina 19:51, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
That's definitely not a rooster? Such a big crown and wattles for a hen! -- Ikan Kekek 01:03, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
No rooster tail, that's definitely a hen ! --Tsaag Valren 18:02, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naro, blue-eyed cross-siamese cat, at Josselin 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality and good-looking cat. Please skip a line between nominations. -- Ikan Kekek 23:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château du Gros-Chêne 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 12:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chat tigré Josselin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality -- Spurzem 21:27, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josselin, gargouille Notre Dame du Roncier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality, funny perspective. --Palauenc05 09:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this surveyEdit

Dear Tsaag Valren,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:20, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Question de micro peut-êtreEdit

Bonjour,

Je découvre au moins avec amusement tes fichiers comme
 

Je passe te dire que j'ai entendu des bruits parasites sur certains fichiers, parfois juste à la fin comme si tu donnais un petit coup sur la table, mais parfois au milieu. Je n'y connais rien en son, mais j'ai encore assez d'oreille. Il est dommage de gâcher ta belle voix ; ça doit être assez facile de voir quand ça se produit. Je peux te donner des fichiers exemples si tu veux.

Cordialement, de Rennes.

Hervé Tigier (talk) 21:37, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Bonjour Hervé ! Oui, je débute en enregistrements audio (besoin professionnel également), alors parfois c'est lié à l'expiration sur mon micro qui sature, d'autres fois c'est parce que j'ai touché le micro sans faire exprès en enregistrant. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 22:15, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Entendu, effectivement je n'identifie pas une seule cause. Pour l'expiration, tu as certainement l'espèce de filtre qu'on voit dans des studios d'enregistrement. Bon je ne t'ennuie pas davantage et je confirme, maintenant que j'ai écouté d'autres wikipédiens connus de moi, que ta voix est agréable, posée, régulière, féminine comme il faut. Bonne continuation ; bonne fin d'année. Hervé Tigier (talk) 22:55, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:LL-Q13955 (fr)-Tsaag Valren-regimber.wavEdit

Copyright status: File:LL-Q13955 (fr)-Tsaag Valren-regimber.wav

العربيَّة  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  suomi  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Bahasa Melayu  norsk bokmål  norsk  norsk nynorsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  עברית  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:LL-Q13955 (fr)-Tsaag Valren-regimber.wav. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

That's a bad record with an error, please suppress this, thanks ;-). --Tsaag Valren (talk) 23:09, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
J'ai supprimé les fichiers. A l'avenir, utilisez le modèle {{SD|G7}} quand vous avez enregistré un fichier en erreur. C'est plus rapide et plus simple que une demande de suppression. Merci,
I've deleted the files. In the future, please use the {{SD|G7}} template for deletion of files you have uploaded in error. It's simpler and faster than opening a DR. Thanks, --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:30, 12 December 2020 (UTC)