User talk:Tsaag Valren

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tsaag Valren!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Tsaag Valren!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Cheval-star logo.gif is uncategorized since 17 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Serko-pechkov-voyage.jpg is uncategorized since 17 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Shalihotra manuscript pages.jpg was uncategorized on 31 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Elf-locks2.jpg was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Licences

Bonjour,

J'ai noté une certaine confusion sur les licences dans les images que tu importais :

• Les œuvres d'art bidimensionnelles anciennes (toiles et illustrations tombées dans le domaine public) doivent généralement être marquées avec la licence PD-art et non PD-old (à moins d'être soi-même l'auteur du cliché ou que celui-ci soit très ancien).
• Les œuvres d'art tridimensionnelles anciennes (sculptures, poteries... tombées dans le domaine public) ne peuvent être importées sur Commons que si (et seulement si) tu es l'auteur du cliché, auquel cas tu peux choisir la license de ton choix.

Certaines des images que tu as importées ont été supprimées pour respecter le second point.

Bonne continuation. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 16:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

... Je ne savais pas, et mes articles ne valent plus le BA maintenant. Comment pourrai-je aller prendre en photo des poteries qui se trouvent à l'autre bout du monde ?

Vais faire une demande pour re-illustrer Hippalektryon mais je prendrai très mal qu'on me retire le BA à cause de celà, vu tout le travail que j'ai fourni dessus...

Les difficultés d'illustration sont un des problèmes courants de WP.

Sans aller jusqu'au bout du monde, on trouve une référence intéressante sur le CVA : Musée Vivenel de Compiègne, kyathos à fond blanc de Psiax montrant un hippalectryon (Inv. 1073).

Heureusement, le domaine de la Grèce antique est un des mieux couverts sur Commons, avec un petit groupe de voyageurs qui ratissent de nombreux musées. J'ai ainsi pu retrouver une photo d'hippalectryon dans mon stock berlinois : File:Xenokles lip cup hippalektryon Antikensammlung Berlin.jpg. C'est un peu bruité, mais ça reste pas mal.

Vu qu'il y a une figurine au Louvre, on peut aussi demander à Jastrow qui est la spécialiste du musée. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 22:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Category:Shagya Arabian

Bonjour,

Je suis obligé de signaler une absence de permission sur les photos dont Véronique Mestre Gibaud est l'auteur puisqu'il n'y pas d'autorisation claire pour le moment. Il va de soit que je remplacerai ce modèle par la confirmation OTRS lorsqu'un courriel correct aura été envoyé.

Attention toutefois : tu as mis une licence qui est différente de celle évoquée par Véronique Mestre Gibaud dans son courriel. Si elle confirme qu'elle place ses images sous GFDL, il faudra donc en plus changer toutes les licences, ce qui représente du boulot supplémentaire pour l'équipe OTRS ;) Fais bien attention la prochaine fois !--Bapti ✉ 06:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Désolée, c'est la première fois que je traite une autorisation de republication, je ne savais pas...

Pas de problème, mais ne remets pas {{OTRS pending}} alors qu'il n'y a plus d'autorisation en attente sur OTRS, l'autorisation fournie n'ayant pu être être validée ;)--Bapti ✉ 21:58, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

J'attends que la personne concernée revalide l'autorisation comme il faut, en espérant que toutes ces photos ne seront pas supprimées car ça me ferait vraiment **** avec la labellisation BA de l'article en cours et le temps que j'ai prit à les ajouter...

Bonjour,

Ouf, les images ont été confirmées ;)

Par contre, il y a un problème avec le champ date dans le modèle {{Information}} (à rédiger sous la forme AAAA-MM-JJ) : il est toujours rempli avec 2009 alors que les métadonnées indiquent une date plus précise (exemple : File:Babolna-2-shagya.JPG#Métadonnées). Ça serait parfait de corriger ça quand tu auras le temps ;)--Bapti ✉ 21:37, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Attention : il faut bien écrire la date au format AAAA-MM-JJ (donc "2008-08" et non "2008/08"). Cela permet d'afficher automatiquement la date dans la langue de l'utilisateur (ici, tu lis "août 2009" si ton interface est configurée en anglais.--Bapti ✉ 09:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Ha d'accord !--Tsaag Valren (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Lutin by godo.jpg

Hi, i saw your message on the talkpage of the above image. Can you ask the author to send an email to OTRS (see COM:OTRS for a template) to confirm the license on the image? It's an absolutely wonderful drawing! Thanks. -- Deadstar (msg) 09:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

I have asked another user to help you, but in the meantime, perhaps Commons:OTRS/fr will help. -- Deadstar (msg) 08:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Utopiales 2011

Salut Tsaag Valren, je ai vu que tu as commencé a mettre en ligne tes photos des Utopiales, et c'est vraiment sympa. Par contre, je trouve dommage que tu laisses la date en watermark sur la photo alors que tes photos numériques contiennent déjà la date de prise de vue dans les métadonnées. Je suppose que c'est un réglage de ton appareil numérique, après ce sont tes photos et c'est donc ton choix, mais sur Commons en général on préfère les photos sans watermark. Il y a une explication en anglais par ici COM:Watermarks#Timestamps (ce n'est pas encore une recommandation, mais l'idée y est).

Bonne continuation, PierreSelim (talk) 08:55, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Cheval en QI ?

Bonjour,

J'ai vu les images que tu demandes de proposer au label "images de qualité", et je les ai toutes regardées. Certaines ne correspondent pas aux critères factuels exigés (taille minimum, réalisées par un "wikimédien" etc...), et les autres ont toute un problème de qualité technique (surexposition, cadrage, netteté, pixellisation etc...) qui je le crains ne leur permettrait pas de passer la barre. En revanche, l'une d'entre elles est très séduisante et remplit tous les critères, au point que je l'ai proposée non pas en "image de qualité", mais carrément en "images remarquables", c'est celle-ci. J'espère qu'elle aura du succès (mais ce n'est pas sûr, les "reviewers" sont très exigeants). Il lui faudra au moins 7 votes positifs, et moins de la moitié de votes négatifs pour réussir à franchir cet obstacle très difficile !!

Je suis allé sur la page de la galerie de photos du portail du cheval, et j'ai vu plusieurs de mes "oeuvres". J'en ai rajouté quelques autres de mon cru, toutes déjà primées soit en image de qualité, soit en images de valeur, soit les deux. J'espère que je ne me suis pas trompé dans les numéros.

Deux de mes enfants montent, et je suis donc intéressé par le sujet, même si moi je n'y connais rien...

Cordialement,--Jebulon (talk) 18:55, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Foto sprong sloot.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foto sprong sloot.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Et voilà, ça a marché !--Jebulon (talk) 09:46, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

For future reference...

All but one of your Quality Image candidate proposals were ineligible for QI status. A number were overexposed, and most of the rest were not by Wikimedia contributors. --Pitke (talk) 10:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Tsaag Valren⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Tsaag Valren,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Flickr uploads

In future when uploading Flickr images please provide a unique url for each and every image. You gave an album url for all your images which can be rather time consuming to find the image in question and may not remain valid especially if the Flickr user adds images to that album. Had you provided the proper url a bot could have automatically reviewed the images and passed them. That would have saved us volunteer reviewers quite a bit of time. I think I fixed all of your recent uploads but you should check them anyway just to see what type of url is actually needed. Nice images thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Shalihotra manuscript pages.jpg

---

Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Shalihotra manuscript pages.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Stefan2 (talk) 18:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Sainte Onenne recevant le baiser de la vierge.JPG

File:Sainte Onenne recevant le baiser de la vierge.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Storkk (talk) 12:24, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

• File:Sainte Onenne donnant ses habits à une pauvresse.JPG appears to suffer from the same copyright issues, and I have nominated it on the same page. Storkk (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:La porte est en dedans - Eglise du Graal.JPG

Yours sincerely, Storkk (talk) 12:33, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Cartoons in French about autism

Bravo pour ces dessins, c'est tout à fait brillant, didactique, utile et agréable à lire. Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Merci pour cet avis ! --Tsaag Valren (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Photos du concours d'attelage

Salut Tsaag. Les photos du concours d'attelage sont en ligne dans la catégorie Category:Concours national Élite Rennes 2016. Je te laisse le soin de les catégoriser et de les décrire plus finement :-) --EdouardHue (talk) 13:41, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Fringilla coelebs coelebs Josselin 14.jpg

Bonjour, Merci pour ta nomination. J'aime la composition et les couleurs, mais la qualité n'est pas au niveau des images remarquables. Désolé, et ne te décourage pas ! Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Merci Yann ǃ Je met des clichés sur Commons depuis assez peu de temps, aussi, j'étais intéressée par le feedback pour savoir comment améliorer le truc. Merci pour ce commentaire. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 11:20, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Bien que la majorité des images avec le statut FP soient prises avec un réflex, il est quand même possible d'en obtenir avec un bridge comme le tien. Tu devrais essayer sur COM:QI pour commencer, c'est plus facile. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Merci pour le conseil Yann, je ne savais pas que le niveau COM:QI était plus simple. Je vais essayer pour voir. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 13:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

La qualité demandée est quasiment la même, mais la photo n'a pas besoin d'être extraordinaire. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

CategoryːBois d'Amour

Hi, the problem is that you use some look-alike symbol instead of ':' - Jcb (talk) 22:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Cheval de Przewalski

Bonjour, Tu seras peut-être intéressée par File:Przewalski's Horse (02710137).jpg, qui est plutôt de bonne qualité. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 23:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Poules en bio à Bailleul-Neuville 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is sharp and good developed, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:18, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 19:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Myocastor coypus L'Isle-Adam 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It is a pity. But I think that the shadow due to the blinders is too harsh. -- Spurzem 18:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC) @Tsaag Valren: Could you try to tone down the highlights and tone up the shadows? I think this can be OK after some small fixes. --Basotxerri 09:30, 25 July 2017 (UTC) @Basotxerri: Sadly I don't know how to do that... is there a tutorial ? OK, I see that you've shot the picture using a predefined camera program. If your intention is to be a more (or less) serious photographer I recommend to shoot RAW files and process them in an adecuate program like Lightroom. If you prefer to use a free program like GIMP, I've found these instructions: [[1]] --Basotxerri 20:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)<bɾ/>@Basotxerri: Thanks for tips ː I've done this with GIMP. --Tsaag Valren 15:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC) But don't forget that image manipulation on RAW files gives always better results. Much better now! For me it's OK and I suppose that Spurzem agrees. --Basotxerri 18:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:30, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Black carriage horse head in Chania, Creta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Shame about the lamp post though. --W.carter 20:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Head of carriage horse in Chania, Creta 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 10:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Liverpool bit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:58, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I have checked this submission against all six VI criteria. The geo-location criteria is unimportant as this is effectively a "studio picture" with the text giving the context of the image, but otherwise this image meets the other five criteria. For the record, I have copy-edited the scope. Martinvl (talk) 15:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Course trotteurs Saint-Jean-des-Prés (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:35, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin Normande portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Capricorn4049 21:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Asperger's Are Us in 2011.jpg

File:Asperger's Are Us in 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Beaten man (talk) 06:01, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chèvre naine - Sérent 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 22:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Chèvre naine - Sérent 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Detailed enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 22:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Brussels tram line 93.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Lion and Small Goat by Charles Samuël - Close-up.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Serpent and Caiman by Émile Namur (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could you crop the bottom of the photography, it would be better. Thanks. --PJDespa 10:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)  Done --Tsaag Valren 13:06, 12 April 2018 (UTC)  Support Good quality now IMO --PJDespa 17:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Gunnera manicata bourgeon et inflorescence.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basile Morin 13:54, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Paris Eiffel Jumping 2018 - Sergio Alvarez Moya et Carlo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 21:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Necrosyrtes monachus head, Josselin, Brittany, France.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Les Derniers Trouvères - Marie Milliflore.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 23:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

Oslo

Bonjour Tsaag Valren, je viens vers toi pour les photos de ton chat. Il est catégorisé comme "European shorthair". European shorthair est une race de chats qui est très souvent confondue avec le chat de maison (chat de gouttière), qui lui est juste un chat sans race (voir l'article Wikipédia). Du coup, ton chat Oslo, c'est un chat que tu as acheté chez un éleveur ou c'est juste un chat de gouttière ? Amicalement, --Abujoy (talk) 16:42, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

C'est un chat de gouttière, issu d'un mâle errant. --Tsaag Valren (talk) 21:38, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Merci ! Je décatégorise, histoire d'éviter d'avoir une illustration au mauvais endroit. Bonne journée. --Abujoy (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Jument boulonnaise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, slight CA on top of his head but barely noticeable, I think the picture would look better with a slight crop of the bottom. --Trougnouf 19:27, 16 October 2018 (UTC) I've cropped 100 px on the bottom --Tsaag Valren 21:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Coq Sebright - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:30, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Tête jument boulonnaise 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but the background could use some denoising --Trougnouf 19:28, 16 October 2018 (UTC)  Comment Noise reduction applied on background --Tsaag Valren 20:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)  Support It's much better. You've applied a drawn mask which takes more effort on your part and leaves the area around your drawn edges visibly noisy, a parametric mask would work out better. --Trougnouf 23:29, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Cane colvert - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Naro, blue-eyed cross-siamese cat, at Josselin 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stepro 22:30, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Airedale terrier head, Josselin 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 21:37, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pica pica - Jardin des plantes de Nantes 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:46, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin pis Pie Rouge des Plaines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments More details than expected ;-) Good Quality --PtrQs 14:59, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Poule Sebright - jardin botanique de Tours.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:19, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

★ Your image has been reviewed and promoted ★ Congratulations! Pontivy concours bovin traite Pie Rouge des Plaines 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 04:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Camille renversade.jpg

File:Camille renversade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

109.190.190.71 11:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)