Open main menu

Contents

Image Tagging Image:Stepping_kirke.jpgEdit

A modified version of http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fil:Stepping_kirke.jpg has been used as thumbnail a at http://http://www.bryld.info/ (home page). Due to space constraints, author and copyright notice are left in the metadata only - hope it's acceptable, otherwise leave a note in the contact form at my page.


Image Tagging Image:To_navere.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:To_navere.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 13:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Udendør_askebæger.jpgEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Udendør_askebæger.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 12:51, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

GraffitiEdit

No problem. I liked the first one also, so I'll vote for improved one too. --Lošmi (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Graffiti i baggård i århus 2c.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graffiti i baggård i århus 2c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

File:Femidom.jpgEdit

català | čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 19:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Femidom1.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 20:06, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing imagesEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Villy Fink Isaksen!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:26, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vandtårnet ved Ringgadebroen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama set fra Islands Brygge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Wonderfull quality! Almost featured quality, although I wouldn't know, but really valuable photograph as well. --Jolly Janner 20:36, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arne Jacobsen tankstation.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
good quality --Ianare 05:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stepping kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good. --Coyau 18:11, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Det røde vandtårn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:06, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parti fra den gamle by.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me. Lycaon 05:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Morten Ramsland.jpgEdit

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | +/−


Hello, Villy Fink Isaksen!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

JenVan (talk) 17:29, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Slottet set fra udsigtspunktet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
I'm not especially wild about it, due ti the bright areas and general greyness, but overall decent. Mattbuck 13:57, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token bf44f1214f8f0f57352ab78c646e56bbEdit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --80.167.151.134 20:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Havne udsigt fra dokken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit unsharp, but really nice colors and composition. --Jagro 00:49, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jexper Holmen0004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
To bad from the to tight crop on the left. For the rest very nice so I would say QI. Basvb 16:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Havne udsigt fra dokken.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Havne udsigt fra dokken.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Hello! Many thanks for this nice picture
Is it possible to have an English caption?
--Berru (talk) 18:19, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toldboden detaljer 3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good and QI. Please help reviewers by giving different names to files and/or nominations. And maybe an english (or french, why not ? !!) description in the file page could add, thank you in advance.--Jebulon 23:22, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toldboden detaljer 4.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. - A.Savin 19:39, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Tak / Thank youEdit

Hej! Du har lagt et eller flere billeder op i den danske WLM 2011-konkurrence. Juryen vil snart gå i gang med at udvælge de bedste billeder. Mens du venter, kan du evt. tjekke, om der er en god beskrivelse på billedet/billederne og om du har slået e-mail-funktionen til, så vi kan få fat på dig, hvis du vinder. Hvis du har lagt nedskalerede versioner op, så overvej at lægge originalerne op. Uanset om du vinder eller ej, så skal du have tak for dit bidrag!

Hello! You have uploaded one or more pictures to the Danish 2011-WLM competition. The jury will soon begin to select the best pictures. While you wait you may want to check if there is a good description of the image/images and if you have turned on the e-mail feature, so we can reach you if you win. If you have uploaded downscaled versions consider uploading the originals. Whether you win or not thank you very much for your contribution! --MGA73 08:00, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments: Det norske hus havesiden.jpgEdit

English:

Hello Villy Fink Isaksen,
Your image, Det norske hus havesiden.jpg, submitted to Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 in Denmark, has been selected as one of 25 for round two for the Danish Wiki Loves Monuments (DaWLM) 2011.
407 images passed the initial screening criteria and will now be weighed against the European WLM judging criteria. For this bigger is better, so if your image can be uploaded in a larger (but not upscaled) version, we would like to encourage you to do so. Also at this point, we need you to make sure that your mail-address set in your preferences is valid and that "Enable e-mail from other users" is checked, so we are able to contact you using Special:EmailUser/Villy Fink Isaksen. If we are not able to do so (i.e. a valid e-mail address is not entered, or "Enable e-mail from other users" is unchecked) by October 25th 2011, your image will not qualify for the top-10 - no matter how good it is!
Announcement of the top-10 DaWLM will happen on Wednesday October 26th 2011 on the Danish WLM 2011 project-page. --MGA73 & Heb, jurors DaWLM 2011

Dansk:

Hej Villy Fink Isaksen,
Dit billede, Det norske hus havesiden.jpg, der deltager i Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 i Danmark, er blevet udvalgt som et af 25 billeder, der går videre til runde nummer 2 i dansk Wiki Loves Monuments (DaWLM) 2011.
407 billeder er indledningsvist blevet godkendte som deltagere i konkurrencen, og vil nu blive holdt op imod de europæiske WLM bedømmelseskriterier. Her betyder størrelsen noget, så hvis dit billede findes i en større udgave (der ikke blot er opskaleret), så vil vi gerne her opfordre dig til at uploade den. På nuværende tidspunkt har vi også brug for at du sikrer dig at din e-mail adresse i indstillingerne er gyldig og at der er sat flueben ved "Tillad e-mail fra andre brugere", så vi kan kontakte dig via Special:EmailUser/Villy Fink Isaksen. Hvis vi ikke kan dette (f.eks. der ikke er indtastet en gydlig e-mail-adresse, eller der ikke er sat flueben ved "Tillad e-mail fra andre brugere") d. 25. oktober 2011, deltager dit billede ikke i den videre konkurrence - uanset hvor godt det er!
Den endelige annoncering af de 10 bedste DaWLM bidrag, vil ske onsdag d. 26. oktober på på den danske WLM 2011 projektside.. --MGA73 & Heb, jury DaWLM 2011

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finishedEdit

  català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear Villy Fink Isaksen,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:27, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:To_navere.jpgEdit

Please have a look at this discussion:

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#File:To_navere.jpg

--ALE! ¿…? 13:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

I have had a look at it. I just want people to credit me for my photos. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymindegab port.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Tomer T 18:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Helgenæs kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI IMO.--ArildV 15:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egåen3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
could be sharper, but it's a nice one :) --Carschten 17:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Familien Waagepetersen 1830 by Wilhelm Bendz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Familien Waagepetersen 1830 by Wilhelm Bendz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

En kommentar om PD-Art-licensenEdit

PD-Art-licensskabelonen startede sit liv som en henvisning til Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.-retssagen. Corel havde solgt en cdrom med affotograferede, gamle malerier, hvor Bridgeman hævdede at have ophavsretten til fotografierne, men dommen var at fotografierne ikke levede op til det amerikanske værkshøjdekriterie, lettere forsimplet sagt fordi når objektet er fuldstændigt fladt, kan der ikke være nogen originalitet i hverken valg af indfaldsvinkel, belysning eller beskæring. At det princip ikke gælder f.eks. i de nordiske lande, hvor fotografier også beskyttes, når de ikke lever op til værkshøjdekriteriet, men at skabelonen bruges på commons alligevel, er forvirrende nok, men det jeg egentlig ville sige var, at når bare der er det mindste ved objektet, der kan kaste skygge (som f.eks. reliefvirkningen på en almindelig mønt), så kan man ikke henvise til princippet i Bridgeman v. Corel-sagen og dermed heller ikke bruge PD-Art-licensskabelonen. Det er også uddybet på Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag og Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs. Det vil sige, at en redigering som [1] er en fejl. Det fotografi, er helt afgjort beskyttet under både amerikansk og dansk lovgivning. Undskyld, det blev lidt langtrukkent, men jeg håber, det hjalp mere end det forvirrede. 95.166.78.149 16:57, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thx (tak) er nu rettet. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Skiltet ved albert dams eg.jpgEdit

 
File:Skiltet ved albert dams eg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.166.78.149 07:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herman Kähler i sit værksted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 14:09, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street dancer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moonik 19:37, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! London Islamic Cultural Society.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
It needs a new crop (see upper part) after a rotation + dust in the sky Poco a poco 19:20, 15 June 2012 (UTC) - Corrected now (thx) --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:51, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Good now for QI Poco a poco 20:11, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
London City skyline.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galionsfigur på Hjejlen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 19:40, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Okkerfarvet vandfald.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. Please consider a more detailed description, such as where the picture was taken.--ArildV 12:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC) More info added --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genforeningstårnet på Ejer Bavnehøj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok, explanation accepted. --Cayambe 05:40, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

AutopatrolledEdit

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, you can now share images from Flickr using the UploadWizard, batch-upload up to 500 files with UploadWizard instead of 50, move up to 32 pages per minute instead of 8, and upload freely licensed audio files in the MP3 format. Thank you. INeverCry 19:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skagen Station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:04, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Bertel Thorvaldsen with the Bust of Horace Vernet.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:05, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ole Rømer Observatoriet.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --D4m1en 17:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
That is not my picture, but belongs to Olebus. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarhus Rådhus tårn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
excellent work! --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borum vejkiste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JDP90 18:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stenhøj.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Overprocessed! --Iifar 18:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment New version uploaded - not so overprocessed! --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC). Sorry, but it's still not QI to me, because image is mostly out of focus and the sky is pretty noisy. --Iifar 16:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC). Yet another version uploaded - now a simple jpg and not a bad HDR --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC).   Support Very nice sky, no need for HDR! --Iifar 07:33, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Aarhus Rådhus tårn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aarhus Rådhus tårn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rolsø Ødekirke Panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 17:20, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den røde dukkevogn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice picture, but large blown out parts on the dress and the hair. --Coyau 21:48, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, that's right, but now the large blown out parts is corrected. --Villy Fink Isaksen 11:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
Much better. QI now. --Coyau 18:13, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumskrællet skælhat (Pholiota squarrosa) 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Very good quality. I love that a piece of the top mushroom was falling when the picture was taken, but still even that piece is super sharp. Jopparn 20:05, 23 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Villy Fink Isaksen,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:35, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brandslange.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. Nice composition. --Kadellar 17:21, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumskrællet skælhat (Pholiota squarrosa) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good. --Mattbuck 14:58, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 - vinderafsløringEdit

Hejsa!

Den 5. december kl. 17 mødes vi til WikiWednesday i Guldbergsalen på Nationalmuseet og afslører, hvem der vandt den danske del af Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Du skal være hjerteligt velkommen! --Palnatoke (talk) 20:32, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gang i sydsiden af Århus Domkirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Now! :) --Poco a poco 20:29, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ur over døren til Landemodesalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Strange vertical (but broken) black lines? Mattbuck 13:46, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
The two lines are lines from split wood, that the clock are made of (it is an old clock). --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:37, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
OK then. Mattbuck 12:00, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Set nominationsEdit

There actually is a template for set nominations, but I think it's only available at the english Commons:Featured picture candidates page at the moment. I was asked to make it a little over a week ago, so it hasn't propogated yet.

That said, I don't think we can feature an entire category of images due to source at once. May I suggest smaller sets, by artist or time period or subject (and from the Statens Museum for Kunst)? Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:32, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

WLM BarnstarEdit

 

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!


File:P.S. Krøyer maler Badende drenge på Skagen Sønderstrand.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:02, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 openEdit

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:33, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Trambus Hans Andersen Ebbesen 1932.jpgEdit

Hvordan fjerner du det hæslige danskebilleder.dk vandmærke på billedet? --Gajolen (talk) 08:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

det er bare "skåret af" lige over teksten. (billedet er beskåret) --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanterne på godsbanens hovedbygning.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hejmdal - Kræftpatienternes Hus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Carschten 16:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hejmdal - Kræftpatienternes Hus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment stitching errors, CA --Carschten 16:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Corrected for stitching error, CA? --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
  Support --Carschten 11:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aftenstemning ved Skjoldhøj Kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice composition.--ArildV 15:43, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjoldhøj Kirke ved solnedgang 14 juni 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality--Lmbuga 00:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Pauls Kirkes bagside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 12:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Traktor med høvender.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Please add proper categories and expand the image description a little bit. Can you locate the image, please? --High Contrast 20:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
  Done --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:14, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
  Support Good now. Although, the Dansk-description might be expandable. --High Contrast 18:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Constantinsborg 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langør Kirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tunøfærgen på vej ud fra Tunøhavn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good --A.Savin 08:51, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langør Kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, though somewhat underxposed. --Smial 21:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sønderborg Slots gård.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --A.Savin 09:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langør Kirke indgangsparti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 15:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ved kæret nordby.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

Two fixable problems imo (see notes, please). --JLPC 17:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
  Done fixed two problems --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
QI now. --JLPC 16:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


File:Teddy Sørensens gravsted.jpgEdit

 
File:Teddy Sørensens gravsted.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

heb [T C E] 10:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornsiloer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:20, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
I have fixed a small tilt --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snart høsttid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Nice. --Jastrow 19:13, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Egå Mølle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File:City Point view panorama.jpgEdit

Thank you for uploading this picture! I hope you don't mind me putting it in my term paper about 30 St Mary Axe under the CC-BY-SA-3.0 along with your name. Keep up the good work! Regards, ishottheserif2 17:45, 11 August 2013 UTC+2

It's all right, thx for letting me know about it. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:47, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kite ved Åkrogen strand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford A ver 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! K 563 i remise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

London skylineEdit

Using the panorama to illustrate a London travel column in the Tyler Morning Telegraph with full photo attribution.

Thanks, but please give more precise information (link or nummer and date for Tyler Morning Telegraph) --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:01, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mærsk Mc-Kinney Møller (Aarhus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK for me --Rjcastillo 18:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isbjerget.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Too much sky for my taste, but good to go --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sostrup Slot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
perspective to removen the left and the right are leaning in --Christian Ferrer 10:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Perspective fixed --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)   Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salgsbod ved vej i Åbo ved Aarhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Overexposed sky, however you could crop it away --A.Savin 14:14, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Cropped --Villy Fink Isaksen 14:34, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  Support good now --A.Savin 22:15, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Billeder af danske kirkerEdit

Hej Villy Fink Isaksen, kunne du have lyst til at hjælpe med at lægge billederne af Danmarks kirker i deres rette kategorier? Jeg har foreløbig ryddet grundigt op i Category:Churches in Denmark ved bl.a. at flytte alle løse billeder i mappen – på nær et par stykker, jeg ikke kunne identificere – til deres respektive kirke-kategori. Der ligger dog stadig cirka 1.900 billeder i Category:Danske Kirker, Slotte, Herregaarde og Mindesmærker, som ville høre bedre hjemme i deres respektive kirke-kategori; så hvis du har lidt tid tilovers en gang imellem, kunne det være en stor hjælp, hvis du gad kigge i sidstnævnte mappe og omkategorisere måske 10-20 billeder, eller så mange du nu orker. Hvis vi er tilpas mange, der gør dette, kan vi gradvis få skabt lidt bedre orden i billederne af Danmarks kirker. Jeg håber på din støtte! :-) Mvh. Bob Collowan (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Jo, det skal jeg nok. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 AnnouncementEdit

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarhus Hovedbanegård aften.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:04, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 AnnouncementEdit

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!Edit

 
2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transformatortårn i Balle ved Balle Tværvej og Findalsvej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astrup Præstegård.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --JLPC 15:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiset kirke 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tiset kirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Better. --Mattbuck 12:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results AnnouncementEdit

Picture of the Year 2013 ResultsEdit

 
The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Villy Fink Isaksen,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trappe i rådhushallen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:25, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Journeymen ImageEdit

Hey, I really liked your journeymen image and used it at http://understandinggermany.de/traditions/a-fascinating-tradition-traveling-journeymen/ . As requested, I'm posting this message to let you know. Thank you!

Junesun (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

You are welcome - thx for telling me. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:37, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

FP promotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Trappe i rådhushallen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Trappe i rådhushallen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Category:Tjen_KirkeEdit

Beethoven9 (talk) 15:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siloetten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Facade på Aarhus Rådhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:23, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mursten 1927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --Lewis Hulbert 14:06, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Drikke fontaine i Aarhus Rådhus.jpgEdit

I like this. Could be an FP? Personally, I'd crop a little off the bottom and right just to have the diagonal lines go to the corners. -- Colin (talk) 12:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fredensgade 36 – facaden mod Sønder Alle, Aarhus, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sydfacade af Aarhus Rådhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support --Cccefalon 10:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Endegavl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busstoppested med læskærm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
CA. Perspective issues. I'm unsure if this can fixed without loss of the lower right corner of the bus stop, --Cccefalon 18:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Corrected --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  Weak support Quality is ok, just the bottom right corner is a little bit tight. --Cccefalon 19:09, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kantpæl ved Løgten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Ok --Poco a poco 18:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voldgrav ved Rosenholm Slot 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. However, have a look at my annotation, if you are keen to enhance the already good photo. --Cccefalon 18:41, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
done --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voldgrav ved Rosenholm Slot.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, very atmospheric. --Uoaei1 07:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krudttårnet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support QI for me --Halavar 21:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 12 punds kanon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Top crop is a bit tight but still ok --Poco a poco 16:39, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stegø Mølle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:17, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chokoladefabrikken Elvirasminde 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:29, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, User:Villy Fink Isaksen, I noticed your revert and corrected my mistake, thanks. Lotje (talk) 15:55, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indgang til Gudsageren.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 12:55, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dør i Skansen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! De fem søstre i århus perspetiv korrekt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Way good enough for QI anyway, great level of detail, but please scan the entire image for dust spots, there’s quite a lot of them in the sky. --Kreuzschnabel 14:31, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Thx for reviews - Spots removed. --Villy Fink Isaksen 17:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarhus Universitets hovedbygning set fra parken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Invasive proposal of 15 pictures. I do not review them, sorry--Lmbuga 16:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Okay, what is the limit?--Villy Fink Isaksen 17:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry (poor English), I don't know the limit, but if you comment four pictures, you can propose 4-6-8 pictures. I can not answer that question. Perhaps others can. But if all users propose 10 images without commenting...--Lmbuga 18:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I take back what I said--Lmbuga 18:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
According to the Guidelines, "a couple". That may be imprecise, but it is less than sixteen for sure. Just spread them out a bit, and review some in-between. --Generic1139 18:46, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Review Good picture, but CAs (see notes and delete then it, please). If you fix CAs, good quality IMO--Lmbuga 18:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
CA fixed thx a lot I am learning it.--Villy Fink Isaksen 19:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:28, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trappe til nordre ringgade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Efeu omkring vinduerne, facade mod Universitetsparken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Again CAs. Good IMO if you fix them--Lmbuga 19:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Fixed CA --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  Support Better, QI for me--Lmbuga 20:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buerne mod parken 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:05, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buerne i parken.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Nice and good, but again CAs (see note)--Lmbuga 19:08, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Fixed CA --Villy Fink Isaksen 20:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:02, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

BirdsEdit

In the "ARoS camera obscura correted.jpg" QI candidate image, I'm not trying to decide if it is a bird or a spot (I'm pretty sure it is a bird), I'm just saying that since it isn't a part of the subject, and distracts from the image, and is easily removed, it should be removed. If it was a flock, or was part of the subject, then no, but in this case, yes. Not a big deal either way, though. --Generic1139 (talk) 22:39, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

The "bird" is removed now! Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 02:21, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Looks good. Generic1139 (talk) 04:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ARoS camera obscura correted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Small halos but IMO still QI. --XRay 08:38, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
THX, Can you put some notes to show me where it occurs? --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  Comment I just added two notes. But: It's really a minor problem.--XRay 10:06, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  Comment THX, but I cannot really see it. --Villy Fink Isaksen 10:24, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
The halo on the building is a yellow line a few pixels wide. It might just be a reflection of the sun from the edge of the rail. As XRay said, it is very minor. If you do make a change, there is a black spot/bird (see note) you can remove at the same time. --Generic1139 06:04, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
It is probably a bird, I have had a look at the serie from the same sesion, and on another one there is a "bird" on an other place and the rest does not having this "bird".Villy Fink Isaksen 11:08, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
The "bird" has been removed. Villy Fink Isaksen 02:23, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vandtårn Langkær.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Please remove spot (see notes), then QI --Generic1139 15:14, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
THX, dust spot is now removed. --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
... and the "bird" (was overlooked).--Villy Fink Isaksen 16:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Good quality --Generic1139 22:19, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pøt Mølle set fra indkørslen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 10:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klokkestabel Råbjerg Kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Location added Villy Fink Isaksen 07:13, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Perspective yet to be done (see the glacing bars of the church). Sky needs chroma denoising. All fixable; it is a nice motif. --Cccefalon 08:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
  Done tried to fix perspective and color denoise Villy Fink Isaksen 09:53, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
Much better! --Cccefalon 15:06, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Død fugl på stranden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Unpleasant shot, but good.--Johanning 21:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Ancher og PS Krøyer skulptur af Laurits Tuxen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Strange colour contrast and the stele seem to be sunken in the ground on the left side. All not your fault; it's QI. --Cccefalon 19:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skagen kirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--ArildV 08:58, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stranden ved Skiveren different workflow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment IMO there are CAs on the right (and it's a little bit unsharp.)--XRay 11:49, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  Done I have tried to fix CA og I have sharpened it. Villy Fink Isaksen 13:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  Support IMO it's OK now.--XRay 15:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Emile robin 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

Notification about possible deletionEdit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Væksthuset botanisk have Aarhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. A little bit unsharp, but acceptable. --XRay 08:09, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bispetorv i århus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tånum Kirke version 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Overall good quality but need a correction as the tower is leaning to the left side. --Cccefalon 10:20, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
tilt fixed Villy Fink Isaksen 10:51, 5 October 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:13, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Læssøesgades Skole et kig ned i hallen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:41, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indgangen til Læsssøesgades Skole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 07:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Læssøesgades Skole ovenlysvindue og væg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tånum Kirkes våbenhus' østmur reliefkvader med hoved.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visent træ ved den italienske sti 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visent træ ved den italienske sti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Busskur i Riisskov natfoto version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Yes, it is dark, but the bus stop is lit, in focus, burned-out parts are small and acceptable, and there is even some detail in the darker parts. Technically correct, and evokes an artistic mood. Nice job. Good Quality. --Generic1139 01:16, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roskilde Domkirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
QI for me. --JLPC 15:36, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Busskur i Riisskov natfoto version 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Busskur i Riisskov natfoto version 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sæbeskål på gang i Læssøesgades Skole.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support OK --A.Savin 15:34, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Læssøesgades Skole et kig ned i hallen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Læssøesgades Skole et kig ned i hallen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 07:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skulptur på Posthuset på Banegårdspladsen i Aarhus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:18, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lystfisker ved Lyngbygårds Å.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fugletårn på sydsiden af Årslev Engsø.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Oppose Sorry ,Too blurred,CA --Livioandronico2013 14:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Thx, you was absolutly right, I have uploaded a much better one. Villy Fink Isaksen 15:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Now is very better respect the other,but unfortunately i see CA,anyway you can ask other opinions,sorry. --Livioandronico2013 15:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Please make some notes on CA --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:42, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  Neutral I do,thanks --Livioandronico2013 16:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
THX, I have now removed the CA as I see it. Villy Fink Isaksen 16:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Ok Now --Livioandronico2013 16:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Set fra vejen fra Agri.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Rückzug aus dem Danewerk 5-6. Februar 1864.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rückzug aus dem Danewerk 5-6. Februar 1864.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 22:14, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Sønderborg Slots gårdEdit

Jag har använt din bild på Sønderborg Slots gårddenna sida. Jag hoppas att upphov och licens är angivet som du önskar. /B****n (talk) 01:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Linkene virker ikke det første burde pege på https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Villy_Fink_Isaksen og det andet på http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode ellers er det ok. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 03:53, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
Den första länken fungerar utan problem för mig. Den andra länken var fel, men är nu korrigerad. /B****n (talk) 09:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok, nu fungerer begge links - TAK! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kongensbro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Nice, but strong chromatic noise at bottom (see notes). Vertical lines with chromatic noise (see note)--Lmbuga 22:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
  Done I have attempted to fix CA Villy Fink Isaksen 19:00, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Could you paint out the bird and brighten it please? Mattbuck 18:59, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  Done bird away and more light. --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 14:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maleren i landsbyen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 20:54, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edvard Munch, Dødskamp.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Mattbuck 00:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Postbåden kommer Christiansø.jpgEdit

 
File:Postbåden kommer Christiansø.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

1989 14:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faun og nymfe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opstilling med appelsiner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den gamle by 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Done --Villy Fink Isaksen 11:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC) OK. --Coyau 23:23, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den gamle by 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Coyau 10:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opstilling med blå skål og frugter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! To køer på en åben mark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Comment whitebalance adjusted. --Villy Fink Isaksen 07:45, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  Support QI for me. --Halavar 11:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hønsestrik i snedækket have.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 21:53, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skagens jægere (p. s. kRØYER).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --Halavar 16:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fodboldspillere. Sofus header..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Thanks. Mattbuck 21:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Hire queryEdit

Hi Villy

I am from a design company in Belfast Northern Ireland.

I am designing a brochure for a client.

I would like to use your picture of Iceberg Building Denmark in a comped imaginary skyline featuring buildings from around the world.

What would you charge for allowing this?

It would need to be a licence with permission to use it on a brochure cover which will be used internationally.

Please email me at ian@parttwodesign.com


Best regards

Ian

Fra et romersk osteriaEdit

Hej Villy

Jeg sad og faldt over nogle af Google Project billederne fra Statens Museum for Kunst, og faldt over det fantastiske værk af Carl Blochs: 'Fra et romersk osteria'.

Så sad jeg og undrede mig over at dette billede ikke var brugt på da:Carl Bloch, indtil jeg indså, at der var benyttet en anden version,; nemlig en du har taget: File:Fra et romersk osteria.jpg. Også en fremragende reproduktion. Virkeligt veludført må jeg sige.

Jeg overvejer at nominere et af de to versioner til COM:FPC, men jeg i tvivl om hvilken. Begge billeder har samme pixel opløsninger, begge er virkeligt gode. Din version har næsten den dobbelte filstørrelse, hvilket vel må betyde at der er mindre jpg kompression i din version. Jeg kan dog ikke se artifacts i Google udgaven. Har du nogen holdning til hvilken version der er bedst?

Et andet spørgsmål: Maleriet har nogle ret kraftige krakeleringer. Jeg er i tvivl om man skulle få en "digital restorator" som f.eks. Adam Cuerden til at udbedre skaderne, men måske er det en så omfattende sag, og ikke bare noget man gør. Hvad tænker du?

Hilsen -- Slaunger (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Hov! Jeg ved ikke hvad jeg tænker på; det er vel et billede smfk har taget og ikke dig, men hvor du så bare har fundet en udgave med en større filstørrelse? -- Slaunger (talk) 20:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Ja, det og mange andre er hentet herfra: http://www.smk.dk/udforsk-kunsten/highlights/ --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Btw - så holder jeg mig altid til ukomprimerede udgaver. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Mange af billederne fra SMK's highlight-serie kunne sikkert klare sig fint i COM:FPC. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
Det tror jeg faktisk også. Nu har jeg forsøgt mig med din version af osteriaet. Det er altså et skønt billede! -- Slaunger (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Vi er ikke alene om at synes det er godt. Allerede 8 supports! Ser lovende ud . -- Slaunger (talk) 08:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Ja, det går rigtig godt! Hvordan opdagede du billedet? Har du værte på museum eller læste du om Carl Bloch. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
Nej, jeg har (pinligt nok) aldrig været på museet. En aften sad jeg og stenede foran tossen og så kunstquiz på DR, hvor der var lavet nogle 'mashups' af forskellige kunstværker fra SMK. I programmet blev også nævnt, at man selv kunne lege idet mange værker var stillet frit til rådighed via deres hjemmeside. I en af quizzerne indgik dette billede, som jeg tænkte at jeg måtte se nærmere på. Eckersbergs udsigt fra Colloseum blev også brugt mfl.-- Slaunger (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Åh - ja elsker at se disse kunstquizzer. Jeg har set nogle af disse 'mashups'. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:47, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monopteros at Gaalgebierg Luxenborg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Done --Villy Fink Isaksen 06:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 13:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Overall high quality and EV. The left part of the images is leaning outwards.--ArildV 10:39, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Tilt corrected --~~~~   Support--ArildV 11:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Translating the interface in your language, we need your helpEdit

Hello Villy Fink Isaksen, thanks for working on this wiki in your language. We updated the list of priority translations and I write you to let you know. The language used by this wiki (or by you in your preferences) needs about 100 translations or less in the priority list. You're almost done!
 
To add or change translations for all wikis, please use translatewiki.net, the MediaWiki localisation project.

Please register on translatewiki.net if you didn't yet and then help complete priority translations (make sure to select your language in the language selector). With a couple hours' work or less, you can make sure that nearly all visitors see the wiki interface fully translated. Nemo 14:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monaco Panorama 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna ålekvase.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 15:42, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Quality is good but the categories are strange. Is right to use "Photographs of pirate flags"? can you please add a category about the location? Poco a poco 16:07, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
There is a "Pirate flag on the top of the mast. --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
  DoneNew categori added: "Århus Havn". --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:23, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den genfundne jernbanebro 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 20:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Transformatortårn ved Urup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Den genfundne jernbanebro 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Moroder 17:51, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reflektion Langkær Gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 09:26, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christiansfeld brødremenighedskirken fontaine 31 maj 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment. A bit too dark for me. You had no good lighting. -- Spurzem 18:30, 31 May 2015 (UTC)*  Done more light --~~~~
OK. -- Spurzem 19:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christiansfeld gadelygte 31 maj 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Very tight crop at the top and at the left. Further a bit dark. -- Spurzem 18:33, 31 May 2015 (UTC)*   Done Light and another crop. --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
OK. -- Spurzem 19:08, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christiansfeld brødremenighedskirken 31 maj 2015 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 18:27, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Randers Kunstmuseum 2.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Randers Kunstmuseum 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galloway kvæg i Kasted Mose.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 05:52, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
  Comment May be tilted CCW?--XRay 05:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
  Done tilt correceted (what does CCW mean?)--Villy Fink Isaksen 06:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
  Comment Counterclockwise --XRay 12:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storebæltsforbindelsen højbroen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Xicotencatl 22:05, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen gitterkonstruktion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:07, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gudenå nedstrøms ved Kjællinghøl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 00:07, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen set fra sydsiden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Support Good quality. But I would cut the blue man and the tent on the right side. --Hockei 17:54, 27 July 2015 (UTC)  Done cropped. --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:20, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kjællinghøl broen og kanoplads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
OK --A.Savin 17:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gudenå upstrøms ved Kjællinghøl.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
The buildings at left are leaning out --Christian Ferrer 05:12, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
  Done corrected the perspective --Villy Fink Isaksen 05:59, 1 August 2015 (UTC)  Support I will say a bit more but acceptable as it is a landscape and the buildings are very far. --Christian Ferrer 04:10, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lillering 2,3 km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Isiwal 07:27, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bagside af et af langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality --XRay 08:06, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altaner på søndre ringgade kvadratisk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:48, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Altaner på søndre ringgade.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gunnar Gunnarsson's house in Skriðuklaustur 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:52, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thingvallavatn panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality but see note --Jacek Halicki 11:52, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geysir 2015-08-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:34, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvan på island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Cayambe 08:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Very good! --Pudelek 14:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Pudelek 14:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isbjerge i Jökulsárlón 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:09, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church and rainbow in Akureyri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Woow, very nice! --Pudelek 14:08, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Topskarv på klippeø nord for Stykkisholmur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments

  Done (Phalacrocorax carbo) --Villy Fink Isaksen 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Good quality. --Moroder 15:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skólavörðustígur and blue bike.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:19, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Solfatara i Námafjall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Hubertl 15:29, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Turf wall pictureEdit

Hi Villy, I've changed the scope of your turf wall picture so that it can be accepted. If you link the scope it to two different categories, it will be declined. Regards --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:33, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krafla power plant - Kröflustöð - alternative.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  SupportQI with no doubt, FP potential as already said. I like the shadow of the smoke, and the light in general--Jebulon 14:24, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image PromotionEdit

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Turf wall in Glaumbær. .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Langkær gymnasiums ovenlysvinduer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lillering 2,3 km.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lillering 2,3 km.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:00, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape looking west from Skjálfandi version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:34, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lunder på klippevæg på sydspidsen af Heimaey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 14:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skjálfandafljót at Route 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brødremenighedens Kirke lysekrone.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --XRay 18:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyrstrup Kirke bagfra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Milepæl mellem Christiansfeld og Kolding.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tyrstrup Kirke loft.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Oh yes !--Jebulon 19:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brønd på kirkepladsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality, still, could you add a more specific category? is it a fountain? --Poco a poco 20:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  Done added two categories. --~~~~

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank YouEdit

Thank You for the Nomination my Picture

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hof, Zierbrunnen im Botanischen Garten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hof, Zierbrunnen im Botanischen Garten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Letbanebro over Egådalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:48, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vejvisersten i Borum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Kampen set fra Strandvejen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Shame about the shadow, but for me good quality.--Famberhorst 15:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalgas Avenue 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holar church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality. --C messier 08:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

You have been randomly selected to take a very short survey by the Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team!Edit

https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_3wl7zNEQdp6z9Vb

This survey is intended to gauge community satisfaction with the technical support provided by the Wikimedia Foundation to Wikipedia, especially focusing on the needs of the core community. To learn more about this survey, please visit Research:Tech support satisfaction poll.

To opt-out of further notices concerning this survey, please remove your username from the subscription list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Den røde redningsbåd sejler ud.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Den røde redningsbåd sejler ud.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

added "PD-old-80" --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CF Møllers gravsted.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store kapel 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
GQ. --Palauenc05 16:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Store kapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:37, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Edvard Grieg ackompanjerande sin hustru.jpgEdit

 
File:Edvard Grieg ackompanjerande sin hustru.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TommyG (talk) 15:32, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Camille PissaroEdit

Copyright status: File:Portræt af Henrik Nikolai Krøyer.jpgEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Portræt af Henrik Nikolai Krøyer.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:35, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:P S Krøyer 1899 - Sommeraften ved Skagens strand. Kunstneren og hans hustru.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:P S Krøyer 1899 - Sommeraften ved Skagens strand. Kunstneren og hans hustru.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Ophavsret på Altertavle i Bregnet KirkeEdit

Har vi ikke et ophavsretsproblem for File:Altertavle i Bregnet Kirke.jpg? — Fnielsen (talk) 09:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Måske, men det er jo ikke værket der er motivet, det er en uundgåelig del, hvis man vil tage et billede af alteret/den ende af kirken. Jeg ser det som når man fotograferer i det offentlige rum, og der kommer en skulptur med i billedet som ikke er selve motivet (det er jo tilladt). --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Portrait of the poet Ilarie Voronca.jpegEdit

 
File:Portrait of the poet Ilarie Voronca.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Commons:Overwriting existing filesEdit

Please don't overwrite files with different files, just upload them under a new name. Multichill (talk) 10:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay - and I am sorry. But this will create a lot of files of the picture. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 10:41, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
yes, but interlink them in "other versions" field. the good images will be adopted, and old thumbnails decline, but File:The Yellow Milkmaid Syndrome.PNG will be solved by consensus and curation, not edit warring. Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 11:57, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Girl Portrait (Marcel Janco).jpegEdit

 
File:Girl Portrait (Marcel Janco).jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Multichill (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Udsigt fra dragespiret på Børsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp photo, but please improve perspective (serious distortion at the right side) --Michielverbeek 15:03, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Done--Villy Fink Isaksen 17:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Perspective is not perfect, but it is good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 18:28, 15 May 2016 (UTC) Sorry, but what is wrong? --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:43, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, forgot to promote your photo - road at the right side leans a bit to the right, but a bit is not enough for a decline --Michielverbeek 22:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fra Københavns Børs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 20:23, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Udsigt fra dragespiret på Børsen 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Needs perspective correction --A.Savin 15:29, 15 May 2016 (UTC)  Done--Villy Fink Isaksen 17:42, 15 May 2016 (UTC) OK. --A.Savin 14:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vindeltrappe i aarhus domkirke 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Abstract view from Børsen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Abstract view from Børsen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fra Københavns Børs.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fra Københavns Børs.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Pia Olsen Dyhr, pressefoto.jpgEdit

 
File:Pia Olsen Dyhr, pressefoto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | 한국어 (조선) | македонски | മലയാളം | norsk bokmål | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | occitan | polski | پښتو | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | shqip | српски / srpski | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fnielsen (talk) 22:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Brandslange.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brandslange.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ventilationsskatte Langkær Gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Beautiful detailed artistic photo, a good balance between sun and shadow --Michielverbeek 19:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cover musicalbum.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cover musicalbum.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stay in school grafitti.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Indgang til langkær gymnasium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:12, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Possible FP?Edit

I like this photo. I won't nominate it myself, but if you nominate it at FPC, I would vote for it. Very good composition. Congratulations! Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:02, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

P.S.: I would nominate this one, if you'd be willing to denoise it just a bit more. There will be complaints about the left crop, but I think it's a great photo of a striking futuristic building. If you have taken a similar photo with just a bit more room on the left side, even better. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks I agree about the crop I will therefor take another. Thanks! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 03:38, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aarhus City Tower set fra Europa Plads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --ElBute 15:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokk1 set fra Europa Plads.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:20, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa Plads set fra Dokk1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:18, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dokk1 version 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Support Beautiful! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:19, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dokk1 version 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dokk1 version 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

Deletions nominationsEdit

Hi, please only nominate a file for deletion with the 'Nominate for deletion' link from the left menu. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Åen Immervad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Sharp enough for a Q1, good composition, but a bit overexposed --Michielverbeek 06:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)  Doneadjusted --Villy Fink Isaksen 15:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC) A small diffenece, but quality is now good enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:37, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plakatsøjle den gamle by.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
A bit noisy but IMO acceptable. --Basotxerri 15:13, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harders kasseapparat version 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 11:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulstrup Kirke-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Tower appears to be slightly askew, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:18, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
THX - I have corrected it. --Villy Fink Isaksen 16:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The PhotographerEdit

Please excuse me spamming you, which concerns Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign. My contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. I has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and it is very expensive for me to acquire this equipment. I has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a camera with a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. --The Photographer 13:51, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

SMK high resEdit

Hi, I was wondering if you uploaded all the high-res versions of SMK works from http://www.smk.dk/en/use-of-images-and-text/free-download-of-artworks/ to Commons. As you might have noticed I created items on Wikidata for all SMK paintings. Quite a few are lacking an image so I'm considering uploading the missing paintings from the SMK site. Multichill (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I have uploaded them in april-may 2012, but there are added more pictures in high resolution. You are welcome to upload the missing paintings, right now I am busy with other projects on the danish wikipedia. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Constantin Hansen, Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom, 1837, KMS3236, SMK.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Constantin Hansen, Et selskab af danske kunstnere i Rom, 1837, KMS3236, SMK.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tor hos Trym (17005).tifEdit

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | ಕನ್ನಡ | ತುಳು | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tor hos Trym (17005).tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bremsesko.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Not quite as sharp as I would like for this sort of image, but I think it's adequate. Juliancolton 02:40, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statsbiblioteket læsesalen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
With regret: Great view, but some noise and needs perspective correction --Daniel Case 03:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)  Done correction. --Villy Fink Isaksen 08:12, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  SupportO.K. for me --Ermell 18:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  Support I'm OK, now, too. Daniel Case 19:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Ermell 18:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Udsigt fra bogtårnet Statsbiblioteket mod Nordre Ringgade.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
  Comment Some perspective and CA fix is necessary --A.Savin 14:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
  Done corrections made --Villy Fink Isaksen 18:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)   Support Much better. --A.Savin 05:36, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lysets tøven.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
really nice, but two big lens flares over the bridge on the right. Is it correctable? --Carschten 21:38, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
  Done removed flars. --Villy Fink Isaksen 22:29, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Very good! I like the lower perspective and accept the distortion, but it's a bit ccw tilted, isn't it? --Carschten 01:03, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  Done perspective correction. --Villy Fink Isaksen 08:36, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
  Support thanks! --Carschten 23:26, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vestre Ringgade, Aarhus - set fra bogtårnet Statsbiblioteket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
{{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lysets tøven.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lysets tøven.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Camille pissarro med mørk skygge.jpgEdit

Pay attention to licensing
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Camille pissarro med mørk skygge.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.

Deutsch | English | español | français | മലയാളം | polski | português | svenska | 日本語 | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: PD-Art is not applicable - the photo is not simply a 'faithful reproduction' of a 2D work, as the photograph includes the frame. We need a license from the uploader for the photograph itself, as well as the (current) statement that the pictured work is PD. The file should use {{Licensed-PD}}, or a similar template.

- Reventtalk 08:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Please see COM:PDART#When should the PD-Art tag not be used?. Thanks. - Reventtalk 08:06, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Thanks, but that does not actually fix the issue... since the image depicts a 3D object (the frame, as well as the painting) it needs a license from you, as the photographer, as well as the PD tag for the depicted object. Please use {{Licensed-PD|1=PD-old-auto-1923|2=*insert photographer license here*|deathyear=1903}}, and license the photo. - Reventtalk 10:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Okay Revent- you are welcome to delete it - there is a copy without frame. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I don't think there is any particular reason to delete it, since you are the photographer you can just license it. I just noticed that you actually have "Villy Fink Isaksen CC BY-SA 4.0" in the EXIF, so I can just do the edit based on that if you agree. Otherwise it actually needs a DR. - Reventtalk 11:34, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Okay - go ahead. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:47, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Just to clarify, I seriously doubt there is any copyright in the frame itself, it's just that the photographer themselves has to license any photo of a 3D object. - Reventtalk 11:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Statsbiblioteket læsesalen-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moesgård Strand i morgenlys 2.2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality --Llez 18:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moesgård Strand i morgenlys.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --Milseburg 12:14, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pæl der viser vej på Nordsøstien.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

Comments
Good quality. --A.Savin 03:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit