Open main menu

This is a Wikimedia Commons user talk page.

This is not an article, file or the talk page of an article or file. If you find this page on any site other than the Wikimedia Commons you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this talk page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than the Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:XRay.

This is the user talk page of XRay, where you can send messages and comments to XRay.

  • Be polite.
  • Be friendly.
  • Assume good faith.
  • No personal attacks.
  • Please sign and date your entries by clicking on the appropriate button or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
  • Put new text under old text.
  • New to Wikimedia Commons? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers as soon as possible.
  • Click here to start a new topic.

Contents

Tech News: 2019-30Edit

13:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2010 -- 2893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbepark "St. Barbara", BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbepark "St. Barbara", BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Charleville-Mézières-Platz, Berliner Mauer -- 2019 -- 7461.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Charleville-Mézières-Platz, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7450.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Münster, Botanischer Garten, Mangold -- 2019 -- 7369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2010 -- 2895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2010 -- 2896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2012 -- 3906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulptur "Partnerschaft" (Charleville-Mézières-Platz) -- 2012 -- 8756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Charleville-Mézières-Platz, Berliner Mauer -- 2019 -- 7463.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbegebiet "An der Lehmkuhle", BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Gewerbepark "St. Barbara", BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7501.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Skulptur "Partnerschaft" (Charleville-Mézières-Platz) -- 2011 -- 1870.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Hermann-Leeser-Schule -- 2011 -- 1876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Kirchspiel, Börnste, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7512.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nottuln, Stevertal, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7519.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nottuln, Stevertal, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nottuln, Stevertal, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nottuln, Stevertal, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Zwei zurückgezogene QI-NominierungenEdit

Moin! Wieso hast Du die beiden Bilder von der Stever denn so schnell aus der QI-Nominierung zurückgezogen? Zumindest das erste hätte man doch wahrscheinlich so beschneiden können, dass kein Himmel sichtbar ist. Und dann hätte man nochmal schauen können. Beim zweiten weiß ich aber nicht, ob man die merkwürdigen Fehler entfernen könnte. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 15:58, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Ich hatte das Gefühl, dass es bei den Bildern nicht wirklich gut wird. Aber ich versuche es zumindest mal mit dem ersten. - -XRay talk 16:32, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Irgendwas ist auch mit dem ersten Bild. Das wirkt alles ein wenig unscharf und matschig. Ist man von Deinen Bildern nicht gewohnt. Hast Du was an der Ausrüstung oder an der Software geändert? Oder einfach die falsche Blende benutzt? ;-) Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 06:48, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Da war ich per Fahrrad unterwegs und hatte nur meine Systemkamera mit. Es war 2013. Diese Kamera hat immer wieder Schwierigkeiten mit der Schärfe, vor allem, wenn man sich ein wenig von der Idealblende (bzgl. der Schärfe) entfernt. Dazu kommt, dass auch das Objektiv bei 18 mm nicht so ideal ist. Mittlerweile nehme ich diese Kamera kaum noch mit, da mich die Qualität nicht (mehr) überzeugt. Ich will auch nicht in ein anderes Objektiv investieren, ich habe ja seit mehreren Jahren auch zwei Spiegelreflexkameras mit besseren Objektiven und eine passende Tasche für das Fahrrad. So ist auf solchen Touren auch eine bessere Bildqualität möglich. Es steigen halt nach und nach die Ansprüche - sowohl das eigene Wissen als auch die Ausrüstung betreffend - und gerade bei den älteren Bildern ist mit heutigem Anspruch kaum ausreichende Qualität zu finden. --XRay talk 07:14, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
In abgewandelter Form kenne ich das ähnlich. Früher habe ich noch Bilder mit Kompaktkameras gemacht und die auch als QI durchbekommen. Heute würde ich nicht auf die Idee kommen, die überhaupt zu nominieren. Und auch bei den Bildern mit der DSLR bin ich oft nicht mehr mit den Ergebnissen zufrieden und häufig überrascht, dass die wirklich als QI durchgehen. Und auch noch von Leuten bewertet, die Ahnung haben. Zum Beispiel haute wieder vier Nominierungen, von denen ich dachte, da fallen bestimmt welche durch. Wahrscheinlich wird man selber zum härtesten Kritiker seiner Bilder und wahrscheinlich muss man gelegentlich mal die Bewertung etwas entspannter sehen. Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 08:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Du hast recht, derzeit gehen zu viele Bilder bei QI durch. Ich hatte schon manches eigene Bild, welches eher grenzwertig erschien, welches durchgekommen ist. Hin und wieder finde ich aber auch ältere Bilder mit QI-Label, die ich dann allerdings auch mit heutigem Kenntnisstand dann noch optimiere. Aus den heutigen Nominierungen würde ich etliche ablehnen, aber es ist recht viel Aufwand am Smartphone, die passenden Hinweise zu geben. Das schaffe ich nur, wenn ich am PC sitze. Es wäre aber sinnvoll, damit die Fotografinnen und Fotografen etwas dazu lernen. Ich bin zu einer zu kritischen Zeit dazu gekommen, habe dabei aber auch sehr viel gelernt. Das betrifft die Technik, aber auch die Betrachtungsweise. Ein Beispiel sind die Senkrechten im Bild. Es muss nicht immer alles senkrecht sein, es gibt Bilder, bei denen das sinnvoll ist, aber auch welche, bei denen es eher stört. --XRay talk 12:49, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Mit den Senkrechten sprichst Du ein Reizthema für mich an. Mittlerweile habe ich mich zwar dran gewöhnt, wie das hier gesehen wird, aber halte das immer noch für falsch. Das hat nämlich in seiner extremen Form nicht viel mit den menschlichen Sehgewohnheiten und -erfahrungen zu tun. Ist alles senkrecht, rechnet das Hirn zusätzlich seine Erfahrungswerte drauf und meldet zurück, dass das Objekt oben breiter ist als unten. Das kann im Endergebnis ja auch nicht der Sinn sein. Außerdem frage ich mich, ob da nicht auch ein Deutungsfehler vorliegt. Ich glaube mich an den Satz zur Beurteilung von Qualität zu erinnern "verticals should be straight". Aus dem hat dann mal jemand gemacht "Vertikalen müssen senkrecht stehen", aber ich denke es war gemeint "Vertikale Linien müssen gerade sein." Das ist viel sinnvoller, um damit irgendwelche gebogenen und verzeichneten Linien zu vermeiden. Wir haben ja auch gerade im CR das Bild "Holy Trinity Cathedral, Riga, Latvia", bei dem man m.E. schön sehen kann, dass es auch zu viel des "Guten" sein kann (auch wenn ich die Nominierung unterstützt habe). Gruß --Dirtsc (talk) 07:32, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nottuln, Stevertal, BMW i3 -- 2019 -- 7520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-31Edit

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Senden, Stever -- 2013 -- 00442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lüdinghausen, Burg Vischering -- 2013 -- 0327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

FP PromotionEdit

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8894-8.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8894-8.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-32Edit

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-33Edit

18:18, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2018 -- 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-34Edit

15:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image PromotionEdit

Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dülmen, Dülmener Sommer, Dülmen in Rock -- 2019 -- 8541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "XRay".