Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Yann

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Photos Daniel Candé/GallicaEdit

Bonjour Yann. Vous venez de me répondre sur la page discussion Raconnish. Je vois qu'il y a plein de photos Daniel Candé en fait sur Wikimedia Commons venant de Gallica (que vous proposez à la suppression). Il faut vous préciser que la situation est impossible : Gallica annonce que toutes les photos présentes sur le titre sont libres de droit et concernant Daniel Candé, ils vous renvoient quand même sur la SAIF (Société des Auteurs Des Arts Visuels et De L'Image ) qui gère ses droits d'auteurs , en vous précisant que pour Wikimedia, il ne devrait pas y avoir de problèmes. Or la SAIF ne répond jamais, ni positivement, ni négativement, en tout cas par mail. Je vais finir par me déplacer dans leurs locaux - s'ils sont ouverts car le téléphone sonne aussi dans le vide - pour en avoir le coeur net. En tout cas, ils n'ont visiblement pas réagi à l'utilisation des inommbrables photos présentes dans Wikiedia (Aldo Maccione, Sabine Haudepin, etc....). Joisy78 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joisy78 (talk • contribs) 09:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

file violationsEdit

Hello Yann

During your request I am happy to say I have the right files and approve to use materials and content which I have uploaded. I have a signed file which allow me to use any content from the webpage and photos. Unfortunately, it was not written as following the Wikimedia standards, and therefore I might suggest that you would postpone your notice until I will provide the necessary authorizations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The contentor (talk • contribs) 19:03, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

PiratenkniffEdit

Dear Yann! Hello Yann, Sorry, but violance was not my goal. I have mistakenly assumed that in the case of officially used print media provisions are not so sharp: my mistake. Piratenkniff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piratenkniff (talk • contribs) 09:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

CopyrightEdit

I have asked the author of the pictures to sent me a copyright information. Unfortunately, he has not replied yet. Will follow up with him again. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.123.103.11 (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Regarding the warning for copyright violationEdit

Hello Yann...


I am so sorry and appologize for the violations of your policy. But as a beginner, i am little ignorant perhaps, because all the images i uploaded is not a violation because i am associated with them personally and i have uploaded them with consent. Please guide me what exactly i have to do to approve those images.

Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2401:4900:1805:4100:1D06:23DF:1C55:7526 (talk) 13:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Apologies and thanks.Edit

Because I am a newbie, I did not understand how to correctly upload the images. In fact, I have not uploaded any image since July 19, so I hope you apologize. I assure you it will not happen again. Thanks for the notices and my sincere apologies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErickWikiLoco (talk • contribs) 17:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Jeff GarnerEdit

Yann,

Thank you for writing. I have provided the necessary documentation in reference to the Jeff Garner photos. I emailed them as attachments as requested. I am an employee of his, and have sent documentation stating that he is the owner of such photos and has given me permission to use them. You may contact him directly as well, as stated on the documents in which I provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amberrstrach (talk • contribs) 17:10, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

EltizziaNo9Edit

Bonjour, Yann, oui, je comprend maintenant que les photos des journaux que je prend des articles sur mon travail ou que font mention,sont pas libres d’utilisation, et bien tant pis c'est dommage, dans un moment j ai cru comprendre que comme j'avais pris la photo du journal "le monde" ou autre,je pouvais l’utiliser librement, dessolée, croyez moi que ça arrivera plus. Bien cordialement EltizziaNo9 — Preceding unsigned comment added by EltizziaNo9 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Subida de logos de una nueva empresaEdit

Hola Yann, me preguntaba, si no es violación de derechos de autor, subir imagenes de mi nueva empresa o pagina web a commons, puedes mirar los archivos, aqui te dejo los enlaces:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameron159 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Airports of NamibiaEdit

Please prove that these pictures are not mine. I dare you to search my files and computer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bundubear (talk • contribs) 08:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

EpigeneticEdit

Eh. Merci Yann pour la restoration du fichier :) Anthere (talk)

I mad a BIG mistake with a file name: Please, please fixEdit

Hi Yann, I have now logged in. Sorry for the confusion - I am not great at this and often upload a file before I have all the facts. Which is what happened last night!

Please understand Jeff, that Yann was very helpful, and changed a file's formal name BEFORE I myself had double checked the FACTS. This is the file - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meghan_Markle#/media/File:Meghan_Markle%27s_great_great_grandmother,_Mary_Bird_-_a_member_of_staff_of_the_Royal_Household_at_Windsor_Castle_in_the_1850s.jpg

Please note - This photo/file is of a woman who CANNOT have worked at Windsor Castle in 1856. She was born in 1862!!! The file's formal title and description are totally different. Please read the UK Express article - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4913756/Meghan-Markle-s-ancestor-royal-maid-Windsor.html.

You will see the photo in the article - the caption underneath the photo makes it clear that this is NOT Meghan Markle's grt grt grt grandmother. The photo is of Markle's Great Great grandmother, Mary Merrill (nee Bird, 1862-1925) - this photo is also in the family web-site that I listed to you in a previous post and her name is Mary Bird Merrill, Bird being her maiden name (i.e., before she was married).

This woman was NEVER a worker at Windsor Castle - she had not been born then. Her MOTHER (Mary Bird) certainly was a worker at Windsor Castle - but not her daughter.

I will now contact Yann and hope that the two of you can discuss the problem I created, check the facts and then fix up my mistake!!!

Meghan Markle's Wikipedia page is enormously popular and we must get the file name correct.

Thanks and sorry againSrbernadette (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2017 (UTC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srbernadette (talk • contribs) 05:34, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Photo Mireille DarcEdit

Hello Yann. Un grand merci pour le coup de main (copyvio). ;) Tisourcier (talk)

From AngeliquerockEdit

hello These requests have been cancelled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angeliquerock (talk • contribs) 14:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

@Angeliquerock: Hi,
What do you mean? Regards, Yann (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello Template:Yan The uploads have been deleted. Your message was unnecessary. Template:Angeliquerock — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angeliquerock (talk • contribs) 12:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)


@Angeliquerock: It was necessary to remain you not to do it again. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Files uploaded by Leire Cano (13)Edit

Hi Yann! Last June some files (basque literature's book covers) uploaded by Leire Cano were deleted because they didn't have any OTRS permission. Now we can assure that all publishers holding the copyrights have sent the OTRS permission emails. Nevertheless, the book covers have not been restored yet. Could you please check the situation of those files and give us a hand? Here you have the link to the mentioned files. Thank you very much in advance!--Xabier Cañas (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Xabier Cañas,
Do you have the OTRS ticket number? Regards, Yann (talk) 17:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Conseil d'attitudeEdit

Bonjour Yann  
Je me permet de te solliciter de tes conseils pour savoir quelle attitude faut-il avoir envers un utilisateur : William C. Minor (je le notifie pas sur ta page puisqu'il s'agit d'un conseil !) qui retire les auteurs de photographies pour y placer les auteurs des sujets photographiés ?
Son compte global indique qu'il contribue depuis mars 2015 mais n'a établi aucun dialogue (commons, wikidata et fr.wikipedia). Son attitude n'est pas vraiment du vandalisme mais plus une méconnaissance de confusion, avec presque 2 000 contributions à vérifier. Faut-il être pédagogue et essayer de nouer le contact afin d'apporter le contenu d'apprentissage ? ou annuler les modifications inopportunes en masse en espérant que la leçon soit acquise ? ou de faire le petit poucet en modifiant chacune des contributions ?
Je te remercie par avance de tes indications. Bonne journée ! Cordialement, —— DePlusJean (talk) 09:52, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Petit ajout d'oubli : Je présuppose qu'il confond la dénomination auteur du Template:Information avec celle du Template:Author.
Pardon pour le petit oubli !   —— DePlusJean (talk) 10:03, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour DePlusJean, Peux-tu donner un exemple ? La première chose à faire est évidemment de lui parler. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Comme exemple, il y a : France Gard Aigoual - Le Vigan - IMG 5051.jpg - Nicolas Louis d'Assas.jpg - Lafayette - Gatteaux - verso.jpg - Malherbe medaille 1815 AV.jpg en regardant les modifications du mois de novembre 2017. Tu as raison, privilégions le dialogue en premier ! Merci de tes pensées en partage ! —— DePlusJean (talk) 12:02, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour, désolé d'intervenir. J'ai déjà annulé certaines actions de l'utilisateur, et j'ai mis un message sur sa page de discussion. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:25, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Merci de m'avoir devancé Christian Ferrer   Merci à vous deux de vos actions au quotidien ! Cordialement, —— DePlusJean (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Sw0Edit

can you check this request by this blocked user? Thanks! --valepert (talk) 18:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

  Done Yann (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

import d'une image ce matin qui pose souciEdit

Bonjour Yann

Ce matin, j'ai importé une image trouvée sur internet d'une oeuvre d'Hélène Bertaux (jeune fille au bain, 1873, plâtre, musée Vivan Denont à Chalon-sur-Saône).

Elle semble poser souci au niveau du copyright

Si tel est bien le cas, entendu pour qu'elle soit retirée

Cordialement --Thinouss (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Bonjour Thinouss,
Il faut une autorisation du photographe. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate of File:Glorious Day for a Spacewalk.jpgEdit

Hello Yann, look, this problem came up, I uploaded this original NASA file without knowing that another version already existed, even though I did an image search on Google, it just did not appear at all, it was taken as a duplicate and my version was uploaded 15 days after the first, but mine is in better quality, I wanted your opinion about this. They have already deleted the image before I could give you this message, and I wanted to see if you restored it. Thanks

  | Prismo (talk. | contr.) 02:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Your file is much smaller, so you have to compare at the same resolution. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Trichoglottis backgroundEdit

Hey there,

Thanks for your comment at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dark purple Trichoglottis (70213s)c.jpg. I went ahead and withdrew that nomination, but spent a little time trying to play with the background to try to make it less distracting. Originally nominated version, new version. Do you think it's worth renominating the new one, or still too distracting? Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk |  02:50, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes, it is better. Good enough? I don't know. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Ok thanks. The encyclopedic value seems pretty good, so maybe I will try it on enwiki FPC instead of Commons. :) — Rhododendrites talk |  16:23, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Is there any way to download high resolution images from the Réunion des musées nationaux at present?Edit

Is there any way to download high resolution images from the Réunion des musées nationaux at present? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wujinlong1988 (talk • contribs) 06:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC) --Wujinlong1988 (talk) 06:19, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Probably not. This is a government agency which has a weird sense of its mission. There isn't even a clear link to its image databank on the main page of its website. And it claims a copyright on anything they have. :( Regards, Yann (talk) 10:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I was looking into this, but I had a hard time finding the image databank. Could you point me to it, so I can dig at the technical stuff? Guanaco (talk) 10:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
The link is under "professionnels". Here it is: [1]. You can browse either by collections, or by topic. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks. I was hoping for some kind of zoomify thing, but it looks like the images simply aren't there. It's possible they're somewhere on the server, but the URLs are hashed differently for each resolution. If they're even available on the servers, it looks like it would be a significant project even to identify the URL pattern. Guanaco (talk) 10:24, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

I had found some images from https://staging.artsy.net/show/chateau-de-fontainebleau-pius-vii-faces-napoleon-the-papal-tiara-in-the-eagles-talons. This website used many images from RMN-Grand Palais.I don't know whether these pictures in this website or referenced by API from RMN-Grand Palais. For example: https://staging.artsy.net/artwork/innocent-louis-goubaud-la-deputation-du-senat-romain-offrant-ses-hommages-a-s-m-lempereur-et-roi-16-novembre-1809-the-deputation-from-the-roman-senate-paying-homage-to-napoleon-1-on-16-november-1809 https://staging.artsy.net/artwork/pierre-joseph-celestin-francois-allegorie-du-concordat-allegory-of-the-concordat https://staging.artsy.net/artwork/hortense-lescot-le-baisement-des-pieds-de-la-statue-de-saint-pierre-dans-la-basilique-saint-pierre-de-rome-kissing-of-the-feet-of-the-statue-of-st-peter-in-st-peters-basilica-in-rome --Wujinlong1988 (talk) 15:31, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Reviewing FP'sEdit

When will a picture be an FP and when not? WikiZeven (talk) 16:38, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, It needs at least 7 support votes, and 2/3 positives. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Rambla de MontevideoEdit

Try to show what is the rambla of Montevideo, 22 km long.

Regards --fedaro (talk) 11:47, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Srinath Singh.jpgEdit

Hi Yann! You've helped out with File:Srinath Singh.jpg in the past. The history is a bit messy, but basically, I tagged the file as missing permission in April, and you deleted it. The uploader recreated it out of process, I tagged it for deletion, and Jcb deleted it again. The uploader then requested undeletion, which you declined. The uploader requested undeletion a second time; Thuresson declined. Then in June, OTRS volunteer Arthur Crbz requested temporary undeletion, which you somewhat reluctantly (I think) agreed to. Based on your concerns, the file was re-deleted by a certain sockpuppeteer. There was some discussion about it, and the file remained deleted based on your input.

The author of the current version is credited as "Dr.P.S.Chauhan" (note the similarity with the original uploader's user name), but the name is linked to the uploader's own nonexistent userpage. The original account has been inactive for long enough that a checkuser request won't be meaningful, but based on what you can see (including deleted contributions), do you think there is enough evidence to suspect sockpuppetry with a reasonable degree of certainty?

Also, can you say if the version uploaded today is the same as the previously deleted one? You mentioned that the previous file was dated 1995, while this one is dated 1982. If it is the same, I think it should be speedily deleted. If it's not the same, I'm thinking {{no permission since}} or a deletion discussion is called for. What do you think? LX (talk, contribs) 18:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi LX,
The deleted image is not the same of the present image, and it doesn't even seem to be the same person. Now Srinath Singh is a fairly common name in India, so it doesn't mean much. Now the previous file had a valid permission, and I don't remember nor understand why it was deleted by DL/INC without a proper DR. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:33, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for looking into it. It's a bit odd that you say the subject seems to be different, because both versions were added by their respective uploaders to the same article (diff 1, diff 2). Also, the subject's name is common, but the attributed author's title and name also being the same as the previous uploader's username seems a bit too much to be a coincidence. I'll take it to a deletion discussion. Thanks again for your input. LX (talk, contribs) 16:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Yann_and_bad_faith_closure_of_DRs_againEdit

FYI. Jcb (talk) 17:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

ROFL. You are the one creating issue, and reporting people. You should find another hobby. :/ Yann (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Deletion requestEdit

Hi Yann, I hope you are doing fine. I am contacting you in respect of your comment here. Is there a possibility for you to allow DRs created by Jcb or any other user to remain open for seven days per COM:Deletion request? I am requesting this so that your action will not give an impression that you are targeting this user. I do not think it would cause any damage to the project, if you allow those DRs to remain opened for seven days as required per policy. You could in fact, allow another user to close them. Contrary to your claim here, the DRs were clearly not disruptive for the reasons listed below:

  1. Valid reasons were provided for deletion
  2. It was not an attempt to end an editing dispute
  3. It was not created to harass the uploader or anyone else
  4. It was not created to change our policy on copyright
  5. There is no active ban preventing them from nominating images for deletion

You are welcome to educate me on how the DRs were disruptive. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Wikicology,
Sorry, but no. As I said, these DRs were disruptive, and that's why I closed them, and I will continue to do so. I am quite fed up with Jcb's incompetent and nonsense DRs, and these should stop. THB, your comment doesn't reflect of the discussion consensus, which is that there is no valid reason for these DRs. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Quoting Natuur12 "Perhaps Yann should have reported Jcb instead off speedy closing the DR's but certainly the DR's are more disruptive then the speedy closings." Perhaps Yann should have reported Jcb instead off speedy closing the DR's. This statement in fact implies that the discussion should not have been speedy closed and certainly the DR's are more disruptive then the speedy closings implies that the closure was disruptive. Even though they believe it's not as disruptive as the DRs. Another commenter wrote As for no valid reason for deletion, I'm becoming more and more conviced that this should be declared an invalid closure reason.. I don't know who is behind the IP but they in fact implies that you did not provide adequate reason for your closure as requested per policy. Another user wrote That DR close was clearly done in bad faith and the stalking of JCB needs to stop, Jcb asked on the DR "please provide some evidence that this would be an anonymous work?" so as such the DR should've remained open until the question was answered - If Jcb agreed then it should've been closed,. This also suggested that your closure was inappropriate. The only persons that agreed with your closure were Fae and Ymblanter. I have provided multiple reasons above why the DRs were not disruptive yet you are yet to provide a single reason why you think the DRs were disruptive. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I don't know what you are trying to do, or want to say, but it doesn't make sense to me. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
OK. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

Hi Yann, thanks for deleting the spam on the Talk page of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:1959_Western_Union_Telegram.jpg.

I appreciate it! You rock -RedKnight7 (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Yann".