Open main menu

Wikimedia Commons β

User talk:Yann

File:Ritratto di Annibale Cavriani.jpgEdit

hi yann,

I would like to ask for the restoration of the following portrait made in 1779 by the priest Luigi Nicolini Source of Portrait:https://www.comune.mantova.gov.it/index.php/cultura/mantova-citta-di-cultura/news-cultura/item/download/378_ece275d4c53206725d5beb4d24fff34e  (sorry if I can not sign, but the phone is not 'at all suitable for wikipedia) —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.50.35.247 (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Moving earlier NFCC images to CommonsEdit

Hi Yann, Thank you for processing my undeletion requests. I had some questions on moving earlier NFCC images on the English Wikipedia to Commons. Here is an example. Question 1: Can I request a move on these images under the Template:GODL-India license. Question 2: IF I understand this correctly, under NFCC rules the images are down sampled and the original resolution deleted. Is there a way here to get the original resolution images moved to Wikimedia Commons? Adamgerber80 (talk) 23:00, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Adamgerber80,
That has to be decided on a case by case basis. I am not sure for this particular file, because it is a painting, not a photograph, but generally, yes, images under {{GODL-India}} can be imported to Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:57, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Yann Sorry I am a bit confused, does Wikimedia treat paintings different then photographs? I this was published by the India Government and the Indian Army on their website. So is there a specifc reason that we can take a photograph from these websites but not portraits (to be more specific). Thanks. Adamgerber80 (talk) 17:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Adamgerber80: {{GODL-India}} means that works created by the Indian government are under a free license. I am not sure if the painting was created by the Indian government, that's the point. You may ask on COM:VPC. Finally, after undeleting a few files, I think these paintings are OK. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:18, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Yilan Plain from the Cherry Orchard Cemetery.jpgEdit

In the same file, I accidentally uploaded two photos at the same time. I have reverted it. I request to delete this version: "[1]".--Kai3952 (talk) 07:17, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

   DoneYann (talk) 17:30, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
Thank you for help.--Kai3952 (talk) 17:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Request.Edit

Hello dear Yann.

I would like to remove and delete all of the picture and information i have uploaded on this platform. I'm the copy right owner of my own self portrait and paintings. please remove them asap.

Best

— Preceding unsigned comment added by SamBeklik (talk • contribs) 17:03, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
@SamBeklik:    DoneYann (talk) 17:33, 6 June 2018 (UTC)

Block requestEdit

Hi Yann, Hope all is well, Could you do me a favour please?,
Could you block me till the 3rd July under something like "Self requested block" and could you revoke TP access too please?,
As much as I love this place I just need a month away,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:35, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Davey2010: OK, done. I let the TP access, just in case you change your mind. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:42, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Template:UnsignedEdit

Thank you for using it, but please ensure there is a timestamp.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Children dance at Mahatma Gandhi Seva Ashram, Jaura.webmEdit

Hello, peux-tu vérifier la licence sur YouTube stp ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 17:49, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Je ne peux pas changer la licence. J'ai le message : Copyrighted content was found in your video. The claimant is allowing their content to be used in your YouTube video. However, ads might appear on it. Je ne veux évidemment pas de pub dans ma vidéo. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 17:54, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Je te propose qu'on la passe en DR et que tu la téléverses de nouveau sur YouTube puis Commons avec la bonne licence et un titre légèrement différent. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 18:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Ben, ça ne changera rien. C'est la musique qui coince je pense. Ce n'est pas l'essentiel, mais une danse sans musique, c'est pas top... Yann (talk) 18:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Tu as raison... mais on ne peut pas laisser ça comme ça. Soit tu vires la musique, soit il faut passer le fichier en DR. Vois-tu une autre option ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 18:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Est-ce que la vidéo sans la musique a un intérêt ? Si c'est non, je la supprime entièrement. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
C'est peut-être pas idiot de garder la vidéo muette ici puisqu'il y aura aussi le lien vers la version sonorisée sur YouTube... mais il resterait encore nécessaire de justifier la licence qui n'est pas prouvée par le lien YouTube. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 19:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
OK, je la réimporte sans la musique. Il n'y aura pas de "license review". Cordialement, Yann (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Va bene. Grazie, — Racconish💬 19:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Voilà. Yann (talk) 09:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

Nuevamente están borrando mis contribuciones indiscriminadamente...Edit

Hola amiga, como dice en el título, están atentando a mis contribuciones de forma reiterativa, que más quieren que haga? he enviado hasta el permiso dejando a dominio publico las fotografías y usted lo sabe y veo que no ha servido de nada porque este usuario no respeta mi trabajo. Espero que me ayude a solucionar esto pronto porque ya me está pareciendo una burla, saludos.--LocoWiki (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

Everything has been restored and fixed. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:12, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
@Ganímedes: muchas gracias, saludos.--LocoWiki (talk) 23:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

The Wikignome AwardEdit

  The Wikignome Award
For quietly examining this wrongful deletions list, thanks!

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Estéfani Espín.jpgEdit

Hola Yann, te comento que en la imagen que aporté a Wikipedia que fue borrada y restaurada, File:Estéfani Espín.jpg , me percaté que fue restaurada una edición de 2013 la cual no cumple con las normas del copy rigth, por lo que esa edición debería ser eliminada, saludos.--LocoWiki (talk) 03:24, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

   DoneYann (talk) 09:27, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

user:Hiba FalahEdit

Hi Yann. user:Hiba Falah is the account used by the production company Arab Telemedia Group. They were approached by the wikimedians of the Levant and were asked to release posters of their work under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. They are now doing do. But to make sure no one else is miss-using the agreement, they requested that their account Hiba Falah is the only account allowed to upload the posters for now. They were supposed to use a special tag for it . I will check all the uploads and make sure all is ok. --Tarawneh (talk) 11:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Just added a note in English to the OTRS ticket; the last few additions there were in Arabic. Simply put, account User:Hiba Falah can release the company's poster as he is the actual copyright holder. --Tarawneh (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Amélie DiéterleEdit

Bonjour Yann. Je tiens à vous remercier pour votre aide récente sur les fichiers concernant la comédienne Amélie Diéterle dont je viens de prendre connaissance. Il est vrai que je mets beaucoup d'informations.
Pour les licences à propos de Gallica, je me souviens qu'une contributrice dans un débat, remettait parfois en cause la notion de domaine public pour certaines images et qui était mentionné sur le site de la bibliothèque numérique de la Bibliothèque nationale de France. D'où mes bandeaux supplémentaires : « PD-BNF|gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/… » et « PD-GallicaScan ».
Merci également pour la création du modèle Auguste Bert. J'avais commencé à rechercher la date et le lieu du décès, mais le temps me manque.
Pour ce qui concerne le fichier Amélie Diéterle (1871-1941) dans « Les amours de Don Juan » roman 1898 (05).jpg, j'ai un doute sur l'auteur de la photographie. S'agit-il de Edmond Lepelletier (1846-1913), Clément Rochel (1863-1919) ou Paul Sescau (1858-1926). Si ce dernier est le photographe officiel des éditions Nilsson/Per Lamm et Offertstadt Frères, d'où sont issues les photographies, Paul Sescau est mort voici moins de 100 ans. C'est pourquoi j'ai opté pour une licence dont le copyright a une durée de vie de 70 ans ou moins après la mort de l'auteur.
Un article est consacré au roman-photo en question où figure Amélie Diéterle : voir le chapitre concerné dans « Portrait de Don Juan en dandy photophile », Section 2, Le roman-photo : le cas des Amours de Don Juan de Martine Lavaud (Paris IV – Sorbonne), sur le site Muse Medusa.com. Cet article comme l'ouvrage original, Les Amours de Don Juan, ne mentionnent pas l'auteur des photographies. Je préfère donc le principe de moindre surprise en privilégiant la licence de 70 ans.
Je dois par ailleurs développer un chapitre à cet ouvrage dans l'article Amélie Diéterle avec une galerie photographique et les références précitées. Merci encore pour vos corrections et le temps passé sur ces fichiers. Bien cordialement, LIONEL76 (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour LIONEL76,
OK, très bien. Pour information, j'essaie de mettre de l'ordre dans les fichiers provenant de Gallica : Category:Images from Gallica to be checked. Les modèles devraient être remplacés par {{Gallica}}, qui est celui le plus utilisé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

LicencesEdit

Bonjour Yann,

Je vous serais reconnaissant de bien vouloir ne pas modifier les licences de mes petits bonhommes de Nadar.

Le bandeau "Gallica" que vous utilisez n'indique rien sur le fait que le document est dans le DP. Le mien, si. Quant au bandeau "PD-old-100-1923", il n'est pas conforme à mon choix.

Ou alors, soyez aimable de m'expliquer où et en quoi je me trompe, car je n'ai pas l'intention de changer jusque'à présent, et vous allez avoir du boulot !

Bonne continuation.

Merci.

--Jebulon (talk) 15:43, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

Salut Jebulon,
J'essaie de mettre de l'ordre dans les fichiers provenant de Gallica : Category:Images from Gallica to be checked. Les modèles devraient être remplacés par {{Gallica}}, qui est celui le plus utilisé. Maintenant pour File:Arnauné, Auguste, Nadar, Gallica.jpg, il n'y a plus de licence. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 03:01, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Welcome back. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
+1  . Pour le fichier ci-dessus, il y a le bandeau PD-retouched-user, qui indique que l'image de base est dans le domaine public et que la retouche a été mise dans le domaine public. Ne te convient-il pas ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 07:17, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
À mon avis, ce n'est pas suffisant. Il faut indiquer pourquoi le fichier est dans le domaine public. Dans ce cas, parce que l'auteur est mort il y a plus de 100 ans (pour la France) et qu'il a été publié avant 1923 (pour États-Unis). Le statut légal ne dépend pas de l'importateur, mais du créateur. Il est le même que ce soit Jebulon, moi, ou n'importe qui d'autre qui importe le fichier sur Commons. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 09:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
OK, je comprends ce que tu veux dire et je suis d'accord. Il faut donc deux licences, l'une pour l'oeuvre sous-jacente, PD-old-100-1923 par exemple, et l'autre pour la retouche. Ca te va comme ça ? Incidemment, le modèle PD-retouched-user est agaçant parce qu'il force à l'emploi d'un second paramètre renvoyant à un wiki, alors qu'il serait plus simple de ne mettre que le nom d'utilisateur sur Commons. Saurais-tu arranger ça ? Cordialement, — Racconish💬 10:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Une restauration ne crée pas de nouveaux droits, au moins en droit français et en droit américain (je ne suis pas sûr dans d'autres cas). Et vu que l'on importe des images restaurées par des tiers sans leur attribuer des droits, il me semble mal venu de le faire si le restaurateur est un contributeur de Commons. Ce qui n'empêche pas de créditer les restaurateurs, quels qu'ils soient. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour.
Je ne souhaite pas utiliser le bandeau {{Gallica}}, vraiment très pauvre, qui en effet n'indique rien au sujet du statut de l'oeuvre. Le fait qu'il soit "le plus utilisé" ne change rien à l'affaire (argument d'autorité), c'est juste regrettable. le bandeau que j'utilise {{PD-BNF}} est pour moi beaucoup plus adéquat, car justement, il indique que la BNF considère que le document en question est dans le Domaine Public, ce que je me garde bien de discuter, n'ayant pas les compétences de cette institution pour en décider. Ce statut est visible dans la fiche d'information du document. Plus d'infos vaut mieux que peu d'infos. Voilà pour l’œuvre d'origine.
Commençant à devenir un vieux de la vieille dans ces pages, et étant quelque peu juriste dans la vraie vie (quoi que "Commons" soit aussi la vraie vie, pas vrai ?), je sais très bien qu'une restauration n'engendre aucun droit nouveau pour le restaurateur. Cela va sans dire, mais cela va encore mieux en le disant. C'est pourquoi Racconish m'a convaincu de l'adéquation du modèle {{PD-retouched-user}} à ce que je souhaitais dire. La combinaison des deux me va bien. Je ne revendique aucun droit sur mes restaurations, la meilleure preuve, c'est que je les plaçais jusqu'à présent en CC0, fautivement semble-t-il.
Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Jebulon, deux petites remarques. Tout d'abord, {{Gallica}} est plutôt un modèle pour indiquer la source de l'image, qui catégorise l'image comme provenant de Gallica. Par ailleurs, {{PD-BNF}} est un peu faible. Il y a eu beaucoup de cas où nous nous sommes rendus compte que les jugements de la BNF étaient, comment dire, un peu hasardeux. Il est donc préférable de faire une analyse des raisons pour lesquelles le fichier est dans le domaine public, par exemple PD-old-70-1923. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 13:57, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Jebulon, Racconish: En fait, il y a 3 modèles pour le même usage, ce qui en fait 2 de trop. Et {{ARK-BNF}} n'indique que "Bibliothèque nationale de France". Je pense que tu veux parler de {{PD-BNF}} qui dit effectivement que la BNF considère le document dans le domaine public. Le fait de confondre les 2 modèles montre qu'il faut harmoniser la situation. Une manière de réconcilier les points de vue serait d'ajouter l'information à {{Gallica}}. Qu'en pensez-vous ? Pour moi, il est plus important d'indiquer le statut légal indépendamment de la BNF, qui se trompe quelquefois (ou préfère ignorer les droits ?). Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:00, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Personnellement, je préfère {{Gallica}} à {{ARK-BNF}} : plus simple d'emploi. C'est à mon sens seulement un modèle pour les sources et il n'est pas souhaitable d'en compliquer l'usage. Je suggère de n'utiliser {{PD-BNF}} que dans la zone permission, pour donner une information supplémentaire sur l'appréciation portée par la BNF, mais sans que cet emploi du modèle se substitue à ceux usuels pour justifier la déchéance des droits. Sinon, c'est la porte ouverte aux DR de la part de tout contributeur qui ne verrait pas pourquoi la BNF a agi de la sorte. Je vous donne un seul exemple que je connais bien. La BNF considère systématiquement que tout périodique publié il y a plus de 70 ans mais dont la publication s'est terminée depuis est dans le domaine public en tant qu'oeuvre collective. C'est vrai en général mais faux pour toute oeuvre signée. Dans un cas pareil, l'oeuvre n'est pas dans le domaine public parce que la BNF la dit telle, mais parce que l'auteur est mort depuis suffisamment longtemps. Cordialement, — Racconish💬 14:09, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Télescopages en série dans la conversation (conflits d'édition). Yann, j'avais corrigé avant de te lire: c'est bien de {{PD-BNF}} -et des informations précieuses vers lesquelles il renvoie- que je parle. Il ne dit pas que l'oeuvre est dans le DP, il dit que la BNF considère que l'oeuvre est dans le DP. Ce qui est bien différent. Nous ne sommes pas chargés de superviser les décisions de la BNF quant au statut des oeuvres qu'elle recèle, ils disposent peut-être d'éléments particuliers ignorés par nous mais en revanche on peut lui écrire, ce que je fais souvent (et ils prennent en compte les remarques. Ma récente carte du Groenland était décrite comme étant légendée en Anglais, alors qu'elle l'est en Danois, je le leur ai dit, ils ont corrigé. J'ai aussi identifié quelques anonymes, ce qu'ils ont pris en compte, j'ai une anecdote marrante, mais trop longue)...
Mais vous êtes en train de parvenir à vos fins: me faire entrer dans une discussion que je ne veux pas avoir ! . Ma position est simple. Je ne remettrai pas en cause ce qu'indique la BNF. Je souhaite que tout mon travail soit accessible à tous, librement et sans contrainte. Je ne revendique aucun droit quelconque. Je pense faire oeuvre utile, en ayant illustré un nombre conséquent de biographies jusqu'à présent "aveugles" et j'ai bien l'intention de continuer. Je sais très bien que je ne lèse personne. Je m'adapterai à tout ce qui me permettra de poursuivre dans ce sens, avec les moins de complications possibles. J'aime bien le {{PD-retouched-user}}, sauf qu'il renvoie vers wikipédia et pas vers "Commons" et ça ne me plaît pas. Et voilà.--Jebulon (talk) 14:28, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Yann, une idée pour améliorer/simplifier ce modèle afin qu'il renvoie seulement à Commons ? — Racconish💬 14:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Racconish: Il suffit d'utiliser comme 2e paramètre 2=c: : [2]. Pour avoir seulement, un lien vers Commons, il suffirait de supprimer le 2e paramètre. Le mieux serait d'avoir Commons par défaut, et un autre projet en option. C'est fait. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:08, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Jebulon: Désolé de t'entraîner dans une discussion, mais ce projet étant un wiki, il faut bien discuter pour trouver une solution.   Et c'est bien ce que j'ai dit plus haut : la BNF considère les documents comme étant dans le domaine public. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 15:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 « discuter pour trouver une solution », moi je veux bien... encore faut-il qu’il y ait un problème  . Nous sommes d’accord.--Jebulon (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Review neededEdit

Not sure why, but a picture I uploaded was tagged for review. Will you take a look File:Venna Lee and L.F. Wilson (1970s).jpg at it, please? Atsme 📞 19:37, 10 June 2018 (UTC)

@Atsme, currently colleague Yann cannot reply, as there has been a problem with several admin-accounts on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Oh, my - sorry to hear that, but thank you for advising, Túrelio. Atsme 📞 23:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
   DoneYann (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Marie-Renée Ucciani : peintre et sculpteurEdit

Bonjour, Je prend contact avec vous sur le conseil de O.Taris dont le message suit ci-dessous :

"Marie-Renée Ucciani (peintre et sculpteur). Bonjour, De nombreux tableaux et sculptures de Marie-Renée Ucciani ont été supprimés de Wikipédia en raison de manques d'informations de ma part. Certains ont été retirés bien que j'ai pensé avoir donné les indications nécessaires au motif de "moins de 70 ans et pas dans le domaine public", alors que ma qualité de petit fils et seul détenteur des droits a été reconnu. Je regrette qu'aucune aquarelle de Marie-Renée n'ait été retenue telle l'église de Tougéville dans le Calvados. Que puis-je faire comme démarche qui soit simple et non conflictuelle. Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 10 juin 2018 à 08:41 (CEST)"
Bonjour,

Je pense que le plus simple est de contacter un administrateur de Wikimedia Commons comme Thibaut120094 (page de discussion sur Commons) ou Yann (page de discussion sur Commons) par exemple. O.Taris (discuter) 10 juin 2018 à 22:08 (CEST)

Si il est certain que j'ai certainement eu tendance à mettre trop d'oeuvres, peinture ou sculpture, j'en suis revenu à vouloir faire figurer un échantillon représentatif de son oeuvre. Les documents que j'ai apportés sur Wikipédia et Wikipedia communs ont été laissés ou détruits sans que je comprenne la raison et ceux qui persistent sur Wikipédia ne sont peut être pas les plus représentatifs de son oeuvre (aussi modeste soit-elle). Comment puis-je procéder pour rectifier et remettre certains de ceux qui ont été retirés. Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 05:02, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
@Pierre-Do Lo Meo: Bonjour,
Pourriez-vous envoyer une autorisation pour les œuvres de Marie-Renée Ucciani via COM:OTRS/fr ? Il faudrait modifier votre signature pour qu'elle contiennent un lien vers votre page perso ou vers votre page de discussion. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Bonjour Yann,
Je vous remercie de votre réponse par retour. Je suis sur le départ pour la Corse où je n'ai pas d'accès internet autre que mon iPhone. Je reprend contact avec vous dès mon retour fin juin. J'essaierai de comprendre et faire ce que vous m'indiquez ci-dessus (mais suis loin de maîtriser Wikipédia ni même l'informatique). Cordialement. --Pierre-Dominique 07:27, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Translation notification: Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18nEdit

Hello Yann,

You are receiving this notification because you signed up as a translator to French on Wikimedia Commons. The page Template:Biosphere Reserve/i18n is available for translation. You can translate it here:

The priority of this page is high.


This month the UNESCO Wiki Loves Earth photo contest takes place. For this photo contest we need an small update in the file marker template. Thank you!

Your help is greatly appreciated. Translators like you help Wikimedia Commons to function as a truly multilingual community.

You can change your notification preferences.

Thank you!

Wikimedia Commons translation coordinators‎, 09:42, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Why did you delete the image of Hyrule?Edit

There are plenty of Zelda images on wikipedia, why does the image of Hyrule Kingdom breach copyright? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:BotW_Champions%27_Ballad_Hyrule_Castle.png

Editorguy117 (talk) 11:39, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Editorguy117: This is a screenshot from a video game, and therefore under a copyright, as derivative work. A permission from the copyright owner is needed to upload this on Commons. It can be uploaded under a fair use rationale on the English Wikipedia. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:57, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

User: Boom JaysonEdit

Please take a look at the other uploads by user Boom Jayson (talk · contribs). All of them look like copyvio and user has marked them as own work. Thank you. // sikander { talk } 14:30, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

   DoneYann (talk) 16:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Yann !Edit

Hello ! In several cases it is not easy to ask all families to prove in Wikimedia they given portraits of their fathers or grand-fathers. Please delete all this portraits. Some of my maps (for example Ligne Jirecek.jpg and Valaques-Vlachs.jpg) are just french translations of my colleague Bogdan Giuşcă's english files (as mentioned) [3] and [4]. I show Sting (Eric Gaba) as source of my actualised "Mediterranean sea physical & political map.png" (with Montenegro ; .png because I can't modify an .svg map) : now it is deleted, and we have only the not actualised Eric Gaba's (Sting) map without Montenegro from 2008 here [5]. About my dinosaurs, I explained (vainly) that Genusaurus01.jpg and Lophostropheus4.jpg are my drawings of my book Miroirs de la Terre (writer Stephen Giner) [6] and the site cited by Elcobbola, MonacoMatin, is not my source but my follower : they wrote under my drawing "montage I. Chepleanu" and the photographies of C. Keilany-Priam concerned the persons showed in this article, not my dinosaurs drawings (please verify here [7]). Concretely if any other site uses an image that I downloaded on Commons, it is he who becomes the owner and I the thief, even in the cases when the image is mine (drew or photographied by me). File:Alani-map.jpg were an improved version of Abou Ben Adhem's 2006 [8] (as mentioned). Now it is deleted and we have only the Abou Ben Adhem's 2006 version (also threatened) without the Iasses. About the geophysical backgrounds (File:Br. Chilia.jpg, File:Br. Chilia.jpg and File:Musura.jpg) my sources were NASA Worldwind and NASA Earth observatory [9] and DEMIS Mapserver (as mentioned) but today this links are broken and I don't know how technically to prove my good faith. Anyway I'm sick and retired from Wiki, so do for the best, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Yann, je vois que vous êtes francophone. Ca va faciliter les choses. Durant ma période wiki, j'ai fait pour le mieux mais je ne suis ni un expert en informatique, ni un bon connaisseur des règles. Le fait que j'ai souvent coché ((own)) sans plus de précision, que je désapprouve ouvertement la non-liberté de panorama, l'interdiction des travaux dérivés (très nécessaires en cartographie et sciences) et, en art, qu'un créateur reste propriétaire de son oeuvre après l'avoir vendue ou mise dans un espace public (de moins en moins public à vrai dire), a certainement contribué à dresser contre moi des contributeurs-créateurs. Ainsi Elcobbola semble convaincu de ma mauvaise foi et me traite de charlatan et de voleur, malgré l'absence de tout enjeu intellectuel, financier ou d'égo dans tout ceci. Du point de vue rationnel, j'approuve l'effacement de ceux de mes téléchargements qui risquent de mettre juridiquement Commons dans l'embarras. Mais je déplore que l'on efface de simples traductions, adaptations ou montages dont j'ai précisé les sources. Du point de vue émotionnel, tout m'indiffère, un de ces jours je ne serai plus là, que mes (nos) successeurs fassent pour le mieux et se débrouillent. Bonne continuation, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Spiridon Ion Cepleanu : Je sais que les règles des droits d'auteur sont tordues et compliquées. Malheureusement, il est difficile de faire autrement. J'essaie souvent de trouver un moyen de les contourner, tout en restant dans la légalité. Une bonne partie des documents supprimés pourraient être gardés si les informations complètes étaient fournies. Pour les liens cassés, c'est quelquefois possible de les prouver avec Internet Archive. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Flickr user Seeminglee DREdit

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"48973657@N00"

Not sure this should be closed already, I asked the photographer what we actually wants, I think it would be nice to at least give him a few days to answer that. Even if it won't affect our decision, just out of courtesy. It took him 2-3 days to respond to my Flickrmail so he's not very fast.

On a technical note: Eugenio Hansen had inserted a new section header, as a result you only kept File:Kiss in Black and White 20091219.7D.01550.P1.L1.SQ.BW SML (4211914177).jpg but the other 1109 files still have a deletion template. So if you decide to temporarily re-open the DR to wait for a response from Seeminglee, it won't be very hard because all deletion templates except for one are still there. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:32, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Ah yes, my intention was to close only this one. It is a bad idea to have such a big DR with different issues. I reverted my closure, and added a comment. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Thanks. Eugenio Hansen did not actually create a DR for that file, he just inserted a section header into the existing DR as a comment for no obvious reason. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
It's possible that this user simply didn't understand that the file was being nominated because of what was written in other files, and as the list of files is so long maybe they simply created a new section header to edit more easily without having to scroll too much. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Finish deletetingEdit

Why deletion of these subjects has not completed:

File:Sergei Prokofiev-TIME-1945.jpg
File:Kliment Voroshilov-TIME-1934.jpg
File:Joseph Stalin-TIME-1945.jpg
File:Kremlin Courier-TIME-1951.jpg
File:Lavrenty Beria-TIME-1948.jpg‎
File:Vasily Stalin-TIME-1951.jpg

--Maher27777 (talk) 09:16, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Maher27777: It will be taken care in due time. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)

Photographie « Laurent Cunasc »Edit

Bonsoir, Yann ! Jospe a reconnu que l'article Laurent Cunasc sur WP était un canular. Pourrais-tu STP supprimer l'image qui était censée illustrer le sujet, Laurent Cunasc c.1870.jpg ? (Pas la peine de faire une RfD, je pense...) Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC).

Il y a aussi ce blason et ce manoir imaginaires. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 21:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC).
Une demande de suppression est préférable. C'est fait. Yann (talk) 22:11, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Merci ! Par ailleurs, je ne savais pas qu'on pouvait transférer les canulars en sous-page de l'espace Wikipédia... c'est une bonne idée, je tâcherai d'y penser si j'en recroise un de bonne facture  . Nomen ad hoc (talk) 01:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC).
Salut. Maintenant que j'y repense, il y aurait peut-être un autre canular que j'avais détecté et qui était pas mal (on pourrait peut-être le récupérer en sous-page aussi) : Ibn P. Assidim. Je te laisse voir, moi je peux rien faire sans les outils... Nomen ad hoc (talk) 10:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC).
Nomen ad hoc : Je ne suis pas admin sur Wikipédia en français. Il faut demander à Vigneron. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 10:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Ah désolé, j'ai cru. Cordialement. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 12:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC).

File:Lokalov Aleksey Vasilievich.jpg.Edit

Hello, I have no experience of publishing on Wikipedia. The portrait of Alexei Lokalov was made in 1870, copyright does not apply to it. I found and attributed the original photo: http://velikoemuseum.ru/portrety-vladeltsev-i-direktorov-gavrilov-yamskoj-manufaktury-i-chelovek-kotoryj-eti-portrety-sohranil/ Image uploaded from my site: http://velikoemuseum.ru/kustarnaya-promyshlennost-sela-velikogo-v-xix-v-i-formirovanie-fabrichnyh-proizvodstv/ Please restore the photo. Please tell me how to publish the page in Wikipedia.

Sincerely, Yamskoykraved.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamskoikraeved (talk • contribs) 07:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Jamskoikraeved: Hi,
I added a license. You can do it yourself next time. For Wikipedia, you have to ask there: en:Wikipedia:Help desk. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Micehlotti PuraEdit

All the images are mine as I took them and supplied to magazines, the show card was made for for the car which I have owned from new. All materials are mine. But even so if you dont accept magazine articles why do you even block my own photos taken by me personally and from my own files.?? Why do you block my very own photos I took? Your system is not working properly??

The system is OTT!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 13:20, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Michelotti Pura: Hi,
Owning a picture or magazine doesn't give the ownership of the copyright. As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Then the files can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:49, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Yann I have even tried to upload photos of my own taken personally by me and yet you block them why????

Where is the logic of blocking photos taken by myself in my garage with my camera of my car? You have to explain please why they are blocked anyway???? Thanks

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 08:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@Michelotti Pura: Please read what I wrote above. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Yann I wrote That I tried to post a picture I took peronaly with my own camera, of my own car in my own garage and you blocked it. Please explain how I dont own the copyright of a picture I took personally of my car with my own camera???

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michelotti Pura (talk • contribs) 09:41, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
@Michelotti Pura: You didn't read what I wrote. I said As for all content previously published elsewhere, the copyright owner has to send a permission via COM:OTRS. Then the files can be undeleted. That's the case even if you are the copyright holder of the works. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:46, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi I have not violated Copyright.Edit

Hi, we as an international organization for fair and unbiased information output, have not violated any copyright violation. We will continue to do as we have done until this is recognized. The image of Nikias was a NEWLY EDITED photograph produced by the author's group at the University of Southern California. Why are you restricting our constitutional right of freedom of speech? You are violating human rights.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Astronomyaviation (talk • contribs) 16:54, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Astronomyaviation: Hi,
It seems you are not the copyright holder of the images you upload, therefore they are copyright violations. Do not upload any content without a formal written permission, or you might be blocked. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
@Astronomyaviation: Hi,
Further to what User:Yann wrote, the photographer himself/herself is free to upload the photo in question to Wikimedia Commons as he/she is the copyright holder (ie, the copyright has not been assigned (or sold) to some other person (or organisation)). Martinvl (talk) 21:19, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

photosEdit

dear yann, these photos are mine.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Josesantaclara (talk • contribs) 21:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
@Josesantaclara: Hi,
At least this one has a watermark "tatianaphotographos.com". And as for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

User:JayyyyMLG666Edit

JayyyyMLG666 (talk · contribs) has uploaded new copyright violations since you gave him a "last warning". World's Lamest Critic (talk) 03:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

   DoneYann (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright infringementEdit

Hello!

I downloaded the same file several times, because I'm 100% sure of the copyright of the person I'm pointing to. The reference to the article that was thrown to me is not the original source of this photo.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by AlenaLya (talk • contribs) 03:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
@AlenaLya: Hi,
You are not allowed to upload files made by others without a formal written permission from them. A permission is also needed for all content previously published elsewhere. If you have permission, please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:46, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Iris Pérez portrait.jpgEdit

Bonjour Yann, voici le nom du fichier qu'une admin a enlevé. Néanmoins, un ticket OTRS a été envoyé par Candida Perez Romero le 2 avril. Merci d'avance pour ton aide.--Galahmm (talk) 11:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Bonjour Galahmm,
Le fichier a été restauré, et l'autorisation a été ajoutée. Pour File:Iris Pérez.jpg, il faudrait soit envoyer une autorisation, ou mieux, importer l'image originale, et non une version réduite. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:49, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Merci Yann. Tu as restauré le fichier PORTRAIT, n'est-ce pas? yupi! merci!!! Pour le fichier File:Iris Pérez.jpg j'aimerai le supprimer de wiki commons... --Galahmm (talk) 19:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Galahmm: Ce n'est pas moi qui est restauré le fichier. J'ai supprimé le deuxième, comme demandé. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
merci --Galahmm (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Files with broken sourceEdit

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:101RueDeGrenelle.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:58, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Jeff,
I am well aware that the source of these is broken. That's why there are in the category :Category:Images from Gallica with broken source. I am slowly trying to fix, but it will take time... Can you remove the template, or the pages might be deleted. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
   Done , sorry for the inconvenience. You might want a different parent for that cat.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Jeff: OK, what would you suggest? Regards, Yann (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
@JuTa: Since you deleted Category:Images with broken source and Category:Files with broken source, I thought you might have a better solution.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:46, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, these categories were empty, likely since August last year. I assumed they got and are senseless. If you have sensfull content for them, just recreate them. regards --JuTa 15:43, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
@JuTa: That's tough to do without the deleted revisions. Can you please restore them and tag the non-redirect {{Empty category}}?   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 09:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
   DoneYann (talk) 10:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Images from Gallica with broken sourceEdit

Bonjour Yann,

J'ai vu ton échange dans la section précédente ainsi que le message laissé par Jcb sur la pdd de ton nouveau collègue. Puis-je en déduire que les fichiers du domaine public et parfaitement admissibles (comme tu sais, et comme tu sais que je sais que tu sais), contenus dans la catégorie Images from Gallica with broken source, ne seront pas supprimés dans une semaine ? Je peux retracer l'origine des enluminures de la BNF, en précisant le manuscrit, le folio, avec un lien valide et permanent vers Gallica / Mandragore / Biblissima, à condition d'en avoir le temps (i.e. pas d'ici une semaine). Je viens déjà de retracer l'origine d'une demi-douzaine d'entre eux.

Cela dit, bien contente de te recroiser (ça faisait longtemps  ) BeatrixBelibaste (talk) 15:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

BeatrixBelibaste: Les fichiers ne seront pas supprimés, Jeff a enlevé le bandeau d'avertissement. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Vladimir Yatsina.jpgEdit

Hi! Just wanted to give you a head's up about this image. It's very unlikely that the student was given permission to use the image - this looks like the student copied the image from the website without checking to make sure that the CC license was compatible, since they listed the website as the source. They saw the CC license info at the bottom and assumed that it was - it's something that we're trying to work on with students. I figured that by changing the license to the one on the website (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) the image would be speedied. Unfortunately we tend to have students that don't really look at the copyright information all that closely - I try to stay on top of things, but it's not always possible.

On a side note, I can't remember if company logos like File:Linda Avey company.png are OK to upload. I know that some are, if they're entirely text, but this has an image in it. The student also uploaded it as their own work, which I know is incorrect. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Ozer nora.pngEdit

Szia! Nem tudom, miért kellett elsietned. Megszereztem az engedélyt. Kérlek állítsd vissza a képet. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Tambo: Only the copyright holder can be given a valid license. This was published before, so a permission is needed anyway. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Szia! Néhány képet már feltöltöttem, és tisztában vagyok a szabályokkal. Kérlek tedd vissza, hogy hivatalosan be tudjam szerezni az engedélyt. Üdv. Tambo (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Ááá, értem, Tambo, szóval azért töltöttél/töltesz fel tucatszám jogsértő képeket, mert tisztában vagy a szabályokkal. Félek belegondolni, mi lenne, ha még csak tisztában sem lennél a szabályokkal. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 20:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:18, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Have a cookieEdit

  Good job !
Here is a cookie.
from Dragnadh

Thank you and...Edit

Thanks for the block just now, could you also look at LovelyGirl4ever (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploadsblock user for same reasons? Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ellin,
Why could you not do it yourself? Just curious... Also the reason would be different, probably "Abusing multiple accounts". Regards, Yann (talk) 18:05, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I could, but having asked for help, I feel it is better to put a second set of eyes and another mind to look at the situation rather than one person assuming - and perhaps wrongly. Since I brought it forward, I don't think it's ethical of me to block. There may be no rules or guideline which prevents it, I personally think it is more fair and careful. Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
   DoneYann (talk) 10:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Block WarningEdit

I was given a last warning for copyright violations (which I never intentionally meant to do). Is this warning for after the 'Welcome to Huetter' sign violation? Howpper (talk) 10:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Hi Howpper,
It is for the logos. Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright violationsEdit

Hello Yann (talk). Sir(Madam), this is ridicules accusations. I provide the sources of this maps and it seems to me it is a plot against me personally to shut down my account, because some wiki-mafia bothered by my article and maps.I asked for the help how to upload them properly in the past from those individuals who try to delete all what I upload, but non ofof them respond when I asked for help ,they only respond when they what to delete!Эльбрус Казбекович (talk) 14:48, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Эльбрус Казбекович: you were blocked on ruwiki for a reason can't read, but the picture on w:ru:Википедия:Многоликость tells me exactly what the reason is. You didn't draw that map. You say you based it on w:Orthodox Encyclopedia but I see no indication that was released with a Creative Commons license. So don't base your work on that. Try openstreetmap next time. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@Эльбрус Казбекович: Hi,
You have a long list of deleted files, so a warning is in order. Be aware that if you use some external map as background, this makes your file a derivative work, which retains the copyright of the source. So you can only use 1. maps which are in the public domain (old or NASA, for example), 2. OpenStreetMap as a background, without omitting the credit, 3. maps which are entirely created by yourself. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Skranevatnet (Foto av Silver Song).jpgEdit

I had already been granted permission to upload this image to wikipedia from the copyright owner when I uploaded the image. Could you please restore it?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Democracy (talk • contribs) 15:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) @Mr Democracy: This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Therefore, policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using OTRS. Take note that the current backlog for OTRS is 95 days, OTRS depends completely on volunteers, who work as hard as they can. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: Isn't there a way I can prove that I got permission? I doubt that the copyright owner would bother to fill out that form, when he's already said it's ok as long as I credit his name along with the image. - Mr Democracy (talk) 16:34, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@Mr Democracy: Unless you have it in writing, on paper, with signature or you were given permission in a public tweet from a verified Twitter account, I don't think so. Sorry. Also, when you upload an image it must be free to use for anyone, not just Wikipedia.
You may be able to upload it to Wikipedia locally, but every language has their own rules regarding this. Consult with the policies from your Wikipedia for this. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

re:Copyright status: File:Watchlist icon.pngEdit

It's a screen-cap of the Spanish Wikipedia, so I didn't know what license it had. (The caption and the editing were done by me). ¿What should I do? Thanks in advance,

--Snooze123 (talk) 17:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

OK, I tagged it with {{GPL}}. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:24, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Copyright ProblemEdit

the photos I have uploaded are from the Foundation I work at - GoSports Foundation, Bangalore

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Intern tushar (talk • contribs) 17:59, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@Intern tushar: Hi,
The copyright holder has to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the instructions. Regards, Yann (talk) 18:25, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

CopyrightEdit

Hi Yann,

Please could you help me out?

The images I am posting are taken from public pages on official social media accounts of political parties.

How do I upload them without infringing copyright?

How has it been done on other pages about political parties?

I'd really appreciate your help

Thank you

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Michael N Fouad (talk • contribs) 19:52, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
@Michael N Fouad: Hi,
These files are under a copyright. You can upload them on the English Wikipedia under a fair use rationale, but fair use is not allowed on Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:12, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Yann".