Zumalabe

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Zumalabe!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

El Paular

Ya elimino yo la categoría, no te preocupes. De todos modos, es tan sencillo como en la Wikipedia: se edita la página, se borra la etiqueta y ya está. Un saludo. --Macarrones (talk) 07:06, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Sí, es relativamente fácil, seguro que pronto te acostumbrarás (y si no, siempre habrá quien te eche una mano para salir del atolladero). Un saludo. --Macarrones (talk) 07:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Parador de Alcalá

Hola Zumalabe:

No te preocupes. Así estoy aprovechando para revisar algunos contenidos. Un cordial saludo:--Raimundo Pastor (talk) 09:38, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

José Patiño

Hola Zuma!

Si, es posible, yo personalmente la he extraído del siguiente link: http://bibliotecavirtualdefensa.es/BVMDefensa/i18n/consulta/registro.cmd?id=41144

Gracias por tu interés! --Barbudo Barbudo (talk) 23:09, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Texeira / Teixeira / Tejeira

Hola, Zumalabe. Sería de agradecer no más peticiones de traslados de archivos con la cadena de caracteres "Texeira", pues no es un error. Se puede ver en el propio mapa de Texeira cómo gustaba de firma el mapa "Descrita por don Pedro Texeira". Aquí un pequeño resumen sobre la variedad de grafías. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 00:10, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Nah, si a mí... no siendo ninguna de las dos formas estrictamente "incorrecta"... Solo es eso, transmitir la idea de que en Commons la sintaxis y ortografía de los nombres de los archivos a grandes rasgos... da igual y salvo "razones de fuerza mayor" conviene por lo general dejarlos como estaban, porque para ser un repositorio fiable y estable para terceros (no solo para Wikipedia, que como ves no hay mucho problema, pasa un bot y lo actualiza en un santiamén) conviene en la medida de lo posible no marear los títulos de los archivos. Naturalmente, las normas permiten corregir alguna burrada o afinar algún nombre muy poco preciso y todos hemos mandado a renombrar archivos (ejemplo, yo, ayer mismo), pero en realidad... tampoco es digamos... algo muy útil, pues no aspiramos a que los títulos de archivos sean ortográficamente correctos. Molestias ninguna, para un editor que hay que en la enciclopedia que "corrige" cosas en Wikipedia y en el 99,9999999% de las veces estoy de acuerdo con las correcciones... Strakhov (talk) 13:16, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Frames

Please do not crop out the frames in my images (like this and others). You are free to make a separate upload though. Thank you --Sailko (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Retrato de caballero (1845) - Tegeo.jpg

File:Retrato de caballero (1845) - Tegeo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MaroneLeone (talk) 09:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

File:Marina Chinchilla Gómez.jpg

File:Marina Chinchilla Gómez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:01, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Francisco Álvarez-Ossorio y Farfán de los Godos.jpg

File:Francisco Álvarez-Ossorio y Farfán de los Godos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Martín Almagro Basch.jpg

File:Martín Almagro Basch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

de Burgos

Hola, Zumalabe. ¿De dónde has obtenido la segunda versión de esta imagen? En cuanto a lo de mejor calidad, está abierto a interpretaciones en cuanto que "730 × 730 (61 KB)" vs "676 × 796 (153 KB)". Lo que más me preocupa, sin embargo, es que no la hubieras tomado de la revista de donde dicen la categoría en que está inserta y el campo "fuente" de la ficha ..que la imagen fue obtenida (Nuevo Mundo). Lo más habitual y menos problemático, con versiones distintas de la misma imagen, suele ser subir en un archivo aparte, con otro nombre. En cuanto a si usar esa imagen o la que subí yo en Wikipedia, me da completamente igual. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 09:00, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Hola, Zumalabe. Perdona por mi tardanza en responder. Lo leí en su momento pero no podía contestar... y se-me-olvidó. Como dije, la "mejor" o "peor" calidad (en lo que a ilustrar el artículo de Carmen de Burgos) en este caso me dan igual. Solo quiero que, dentro de lo que cabe, lo que figure en la categoría Nuevo Mundo haya sido sacado (de una manera u otra) de esa revista. Por traer un ejemplo, quizás un poco exagerado todo hay que decirlo, recuerdo un caso de una bonita heliografía a color de un cuadro de John S. Sargent que ilustraba el artículo de una revista ilustrada y que un usuario, decidió, porque le parecía más bonita/espectacular/loquesea, sobreescribir en Commons con un jpg de alta resolución... de una fotografía de la pintura original. Y bueno, que en el artículo de wikipedia seguía sugiriendo que aquello había sido publicado en la revista. Y.. no. Un cordial saludo. Strakhov (talk) 17:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 10:45, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Daniel Vázquez Díaz - Retrato de Javier Winthuysen Losada (1934).jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Litografía

Hola, Zumalabe, yo tampoco soy un experto en artes gráficas, pero tengo entendido (nunca realicé una) que la litografía es en realidad un método de "impresión", "estampación" o como se quiera llamar, en el cual se dibuja sobre la piedra (o sucedáneo) y no se graba la piedra (grabar en el sentido de crear un relieve retirando material de esta, hacer surcos, etc). Esta página, no muy académica, puede servir para hacerse una idea básica de la técnica. Por otro lado, en Commons la categoría "Category:Lithography" no depende de "Category:Engraving" sino directamente de "Category:Printmaking". Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 04:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Traslados: harmonizing...

Hola, Zumalabe. En mi opinión el motivo de cambio de nombre que especificaste aquí y en otras imágenes ("4. To harmonize the names of a set of images so that only one part of all names differs") no es aplicable en este caso y, de hecho, no se te debería haber concedido (para mí fue un error del filemover). Los "sets of images" son, por ejemplo, una colección de mapas de municipios de un país con un mismo estilo y cosas así (por ejemplo, la mayor parte de los elementos dentro de eta categoría), no varias imágenes de una determinada plaza onubense dentro de una determinada categoría de Commons (o similar) (por ejemplo). Es más, al supuestamente crear un conjunto "armónico" has deshecho otro (el de las fotos de Huelva de ese usuario de Flickr, que tienen un patrón muy claro). No hay que pedir traslados por que nos guste más otro nombre o nos parezca mejor que sea más completo, salvo casos extremos (que pasarían, en todo caso, por el criterio "2"). Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 15:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Hola, Zumalabe. Si crees que es importante especificar el nombre del edificio, la plaza, etc, en el nombre de archivo, por favor intenta usar el criterio 2, porque citar el criterio 4 para cambiar nombres de fotos de plazas o edificios me deja descolocado. A título personal, salvo que en los títulos se diga una estupidez (una falsedad, un error, etcétera), un sinsentido (una cadena de caracteres aleatorios en plan "sdjaisdjalskdlasnd"), haya ataques personales, o sean especialmente inespecíficos (ejemplo "calle 123"), no suelo tocar nombres de archivos subidos por otros usuarios y dejo a cada uno con sus manías. El lugar donde ser descriptivos es, a fin de cuentas, creo, la descripción (y, desde hace relativamente poco, también la leyenda). Y cuando hago un traslado para ser "más específicos" en el nombre, intento conservar la estructura (e idioma) del nombre original y simplemente añadirle el "extra" a lo ya habido (no es estrictamente obligatorio conservar nada, creo, pero me parece lo más respetuoso). Ahora bien, eso es lo que hago yo, hay gente con un gatillo más fácil a la hora de trasladar de nombre archivos, también te lo admito (soy un poco rácano, gruñón y vinagres en esta materia), así que... tú verás dónde posicionarte. En cualquier caso mi discusión con ese usuario que mencionas, más que por aceptar tu traslado, que bueno, tampoco es el acabóse, fue debido a que decidió no dejar redirecciones al título antiguo en varios de estos traslados (algo muy-muy poco comprensible de acuerdo con la política de "file renaming"). Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Joaquín de Montes y Jovellar.jpg

File:Joaquín de Montes y Jovellar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JoaquínMJF (talk) 22:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:María de Maeztu, doctorado.jpg

File:María de Maeztu, doctorado.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://www.yorokobu.es/maria-de-maeztu/ Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ganímedes (talk) 00:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Ángel García Hernández.jpg

File:Ángel García Hernández.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 18:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Jordi (talk) 08:23, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (2).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jordi (talk) 08:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (3).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Inca Garcilaso de la Vega (3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Jordi (talk) 21:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

File tagging File:Juan de Villanueva (2).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Juan de Villanueva (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Juan de Villanueva (2).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

83.61.247.43 21:59, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Juan de Villanueva (3).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Juan de Villanueva (3).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Juan de Villanueva (3).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

83.61.247.43 22:00, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ángel de Monasterio - Busto de Gaspar Melchor de Jovellanos (RAH).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ángel de Monasterio - Busto de Gaspar Melchor de Jovellanos (RAH).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ángel de Monasterio - Busto de Gaspar Melchor de Jovellanos (RAH).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

83.61.247.43 22:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)