Destailleur

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Destailleur!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:28, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Glamour Photography.jpg

File:Glamour Photography.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Morning ☼ (talk) 12:34, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Artistic-nude-brunette.jpg

Thanks for the nomination. But the FPC community decided to apply a {{Nsfw}} tag in similar works to avoid a preview if opened in a public atmosphere like an office or in a public transport. So apply that tag in similar future nominations as I did there. Thanks for the understanding. JKadavoor Jee 15:30, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Consent of Models

It would be helpful to have a pro photographer set the example with respect to ensuring consent of the models. You would be helping if you used this template when uploading your images: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Consent Thanks in advance. You may apply it on already uploaded images as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 05:11, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fine-art-nudephotography.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Good B&W --Smial 11:57, 20 January 2014 (UTC)...But in detail, stretch marks on thighs dont make justice to this beautiful young lady... Should be corrected as a courtesy, IMO.--Jebulon 16:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Your photography work really reveals the beauty of the human body. Guertena (talk) 20:18, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:31, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

File:Artistic-topless-woman.jpg

Did you request the rename?--Pierpao.lo (listening) 01:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Bonjour, très belles photos, merci de les partager. :-) Augustus5star (talk) 03:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

		The Featured Picture Barnstar
		Your all images will be FP If nominated Websteralive (talk) 04:31, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For the nudes Websteralive (talk) 04:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jean-Christophe Destailleur.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Jean-Christophe Destailleur.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jean-Christophe Destailleur.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Yann (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fine-art-nudepicture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Angel-wings-art-nude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blonde nude girl back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fine-art-nude.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:23, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portrait-glamour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adeline-topless.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artistic-nude-standing-babe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 06:10, 19 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:11, 19 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nude woman with angel wings by Jean-Christophe Destailleur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nude recumbent woman by Jean-Christophe Destailleur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:06, 19 April 2019 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 21:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artistic-topless-woman.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:44, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Artistic-naked-woman.jpg

File:Artistic-naked-woman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Md Tanbir Islam (talk) 09:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fine-art-buttocks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Liridon 12:47, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)