Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Roy17 (talk) 08:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Removal of licence edit

Did you mean to remove the Natherlands Archive licence with this edit? It seems like a mistake, so please review the file history. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 13:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

No, obviously not. Thanks for spotting it. I've just checked the hundreds of files done in those batches and caught a couple where this happened - an unexpected parameter to the licence tag broke the regex. Should all be fixed now, please let me know if you see anything similar. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:LC TIF images with categorized JPGs edit

Hi, Please do not revert my categories. This category is useless. How are we supposed to find pictures in them? Thanks, Yann (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Don't attack other editors as vandals: User talk:Headlock0225#Vandalism warning. When called out for doing this, and your misunderstanding pointed out, then discuss it, don't just revert independent editors. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

File is not an exact duplicate. edit

Andy, I noticed the black and white has a piece of the front wheel missing. I agree the other file is not as good quality, however, it has a complete wheel. Please, keep both until a truly "exact duplicate" is uploaded.

Here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AElectric_cab.png&diff=872648925&oldid=872648814

Can you revert your duplicate tag? Thank you, -- Ooligan (talk) 04:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sure, it's probably justified for the book facsimile - although the caption was wrong. I've already swapped them on en:WP to the clearer image (although the use on WP is wrong anyway). Andy Dingley (talk) 07:17, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you Andy. I appreciate your many good works. -- Ooligan (talk) 13:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Roofing_by_material edit

 

Roofing by material has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


JopkeB (talk) 07:33, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply