Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please author/source information. If you did it yourself please say this fact explicitly. If it's your own picture you could use {{GFDL-self}} tag.

EugeneZelenko June 26, 2005 15:26 (UTC)

Flickr edit

Please not that Commons does accept images from Flickr tagged with "nc", "nd" or "All rights reserved". --|EPO| 16:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

POTY 2006 edit

The diff indicated in your vote is not valid, it should link directly to your home wiki. Please see the instructions and try again. Alvesgaspar 14:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bronze Fountain, Mazara.jpg edit

Pay attention to copyright Image:Bronze Fountain, Mazara.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User:G.dallorto 14:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Come soluzione ti suggerisco di trasferire l'immagine cancellata su It.Wiki, dove hanno adottato una nuova politica che leggi qui http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:EDP_per_it.wiki , e di marcarlo come {{EDP}} . Ti chiedo di fare lo stesso per altre immagini di autori (scultori, architetti) morti meno di 70 anni fa o viventi, perché sto facendo un lavoro di verifica delle immagini italiane e presto o tardi quanto è stato creato da ogni autore morto morto da meno di 70 anni verrà messo in cancellazione. Specifico di aver dovuto mettere in cancellazione decine di foto scattate da me. Ciao. --User:G.dallorto 14:43, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tuo quesito edit

Purtroppo è la legge italiana stessa che lo esige. Ti suggerisco di leggere qui: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_Panorama#Italy ed il dibattito che in corso su questo problema, che ovviamente non sei né il primo né il solo di noi ad avere:

(Segnalo soprattutto l'ultimo link). Mi dispiace, le leggi non le faccio io. Ciao, e buon lavoro. --User:G.dallorto 16:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

rfa edit

Hi Angelo, I thought I'd drop you a line. Commons:Administrators#What is expected from an administrator? states "You can request adminship on the Commons if you meet the following criteria: ... are a Commons contributor with 200 edits (uploads or texts) minimum". Having reviewed the most recent RFAs prior to my own request, people take it pretty seriously. It would probably be a good idea to archive your own candidacy and come back later. Commons RFA is a remarkably civilized place compared to the street fight that is en wiki RFA, and it's possible nobody wants to archive for you for fear of being considered rude. - BanyanTree 00:59, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

TUSC token 45a0a3e280a498cdd717d4d375352bbc edit

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images edit

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Angelo.romano!
 
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Palermo-Catania 2006.jpg edit

 
File:Palermo-Catania 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

(I have no idea why it was nominated, but I'm letting you know about the discussion since 92.81.162.233 failed to do so.) LX (talk, contribs) 23:48, 25 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Antonio Di Natale edit

Ciao. Ti volevo chiedere perché hai sostituito questo file a questo (il secondo è fatto molto meglio). -- SteGrifo27 (scrivimi) 15:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Nuovo Romagnoli di Campobasso.jpg edit

 
File:Nuovo Romagnoli di Campobasso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Kit body thindarkbluestripes.png edit

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kit body thindarkbluestripes.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 21:59, 14 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 03:43, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Italy vs Belgium - Gennaro Ivan Gattuso.jpg edit

 
File:Italy vs Belgium - Gennaro Ivan Gattuso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Scip. (talk) 17:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Massimo Drago.jpg edit

 
File:Massimo Drago.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply