File:JLMarion.jpg edit

 
File:JLMarion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rhododendrites talk00:40, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 09:34, 8 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:112th Senate.jpg edit

 
File:112th Senate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Draceane talkcontrib. 09:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Iga Świątek edit

W Wikisłowniku zalecenia są takie, by zdjęcie zawsze było poziome, a pionowe w ostateczności, właśnie ze względu na problem wyświetlania tego na urządzeniach mobilnych. In Wiktionary, the recommendations are that the photo should always be horizontal and vertical as a last resort. Precisely because of the problem of displaying this on mobile devices. Magen (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

You can upload a new crop version as a new image, not change original file! This is example of uploaded crop version from original image by me, look at templates {{Extracted}} and {{Cropped}}. Cheers.--Kacir (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Přihlaste své fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020! edit

 
Czech Wiki Photo

Milí fotografové a editoři projektů Wikimedia,

každý rok společně nahrajete na Commons tisíce svobodných fotografií. Chceme vám všem poděkovat a také vás ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepší z vašich fotek a přihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do soutěže Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutěž je otevřená i úplným nováčkům. Autoři tří nejlepších fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Škoda a speciální wiki-odznaky. Přihlášené fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybář, držitel Czech Press Photo.

Baví vás focení pro Commons i mimo soutěže? Staňte se fotografem Wikimedie, půjčujeme fototechniku a proplácíme cesty - více na Fotíme Česko.

Těšíme se na vaše snímky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Česká republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
File:Daniela Písařovicová Jana Peroutková UK 2020 crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Dostal jsem upozornění na problém s licencí File:Spscvlogowhiteback.jpg. Popravdě se ve wiki moc neorientuji a byl jsem rád že jsem jakžtakž dal dohromady článek ve kterém je použito. Anglicky také moc nevládnu a tak mi není zcela jasné jak mám prokázat vlastnictví práv k tomu logu. Jsem autorem toho loga, které škola využívá, proto jsem ho tam nahrál. Mohl bych požádat o pomoc při legalizaci nebo nastavení práv aby to bylo v pořádku? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dokola (talk • contribs) 09:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Zdravím, v takovém případě by měl být odeslán potvrzující mail ze školní adresy do systému OTRS, viz ukázka svolení autora v mailu. V mezidobí lze do obrázku vložit šablonu "čeká na svolení (OTRS pending)" → {{subst:OP}}. Člen OTRS týmu následně vloží samotné "povolení (PermissionTicket)" , viz příklad vložení. Kacir (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Tak jsem asi v koncích....zaslal jsem žádost podle toho jak jste mi radil, ale přesto bylo logo smazáno. Chápu, že wiki musí mít svá pravidla, ale pro člověka neznalého všech fint je to poněkud složité. Zkusil jsem to i přes wikimedia, takový dotazník, ale jak mm prokázat práva na logo, které jsem pro školu vytvořil a poslal potvrzení ze školní adresy?

Já, autor fotografií: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Spscvlogowhiteback.jpg , souhlasím s tím, aby tyto moje fotografie byly zveřejněny prostřednictvím Wikimedia Commons (odkaz na umístění obrázků na Wikimedia Commons) pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International (zkrácené české znění: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.cs; plné znění: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode). Beru na vědomí, že toto dílo může být libovolně upravováno a přebíráno dalšími stranami k jakémukoli účelu včetně komerčních. Přeji si, aby za autora tohoto díla byl ...jméno... ...jméno.... https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedista:Dokola Dokola (talk) 23:12, 29 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Zaslal jste potvrzovací mail do českého systému OTRS (permissions-cs@wikimedia.org)? Pokud ano, byl jste s členem týmu kontaktován? Tedy byl sdělen důvod odmítnutí? Obvykle vyřízení trvá několik dnů. Byla do souburu vložena šablona "čeká na svolení (OTRS pending)"? Kacir (talk) 23:41, 30 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Zaslal a když jsem neobdržel žádnou odpověď, tak jsem to po deseti dnech poslal znovu. Nedostal jsem žádnou odpověď. (ve spamu není) Tu šablonu jsem tam nevložil, protože jsem nějak nepřišel na to kam to dát k tomu obrázku. :-/ Dokola (talk) 17:25, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Martin Urbanec and Podzemnik: Ahoj, dorazil od kolegy mail do OTRS? Kacir (talk) 21:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dorazilo. Obnoveno a oštítkováno. Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Díky za vyřízení. Kacir (talk) 18:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply
Moc děkuji, už mi přišlo potvrzení na mail.Dokola (talk) 19:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Female_buttocks_in_tennis edit

 

Category:Female_buttocks_in_tennis has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Genericusername57 (talk) 21:13, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open! edit

 

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:45, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Günther Frager (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply