Maurilbert

Please use my main talk page at fr:Discussion Utilisateur:JY Rehby. Thanks !

Important proposal

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Karl singing.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:WrestlingBulldog.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:WrestlingBulldog.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

File:René Duprée - René Goguen.JPG

merci pour ta retouche du fichier. a+ Chatsam (talk) 12:10, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Maurilbert!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 19:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:KenzoTakada2.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Fabien3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Arm-ghost.jpg was uncategorized on 20 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Afro concert Oct 11 09.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Emily Perkins.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:FalkBalzer08.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:CatherynneMValente.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Clinton Schifcofske.jpg was uncategorized on 5 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
• Image:GlenLittle.JPG was uncategorized on 6 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Sherri Shepherd June 2008.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 03:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Sherri Shepherd June 2008.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sherri Shepherd June 2008.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Captain-tucker (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI ---> Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Curculionidae_01_(MK).jpg

Hi, I've followed your advice and uploaded a slightly darker version. If you want, please have a look. bg mathias K 14:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Briefmarke.Alois-Kayser.jpg

File:Briefmarke.Alois-Kayser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 13:35, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:UK 1914-gaumontpalace.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 20:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Milkweed.jpg

Replied to you there. --IdLoveOne (talk) 14:47, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

You vote on my image

You said you found a stitching error on the whale. Could you please add a note to the nomination? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

 Done--MAURILBERT (discuter) 23:40, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, but such notes should be added to the nomination, not to the image, and besides it is not an error. I just looked at the original image. So may I please ask to change your oppose reason? Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Once again, "the error" you pointed out is not an error. I checked the original image. Please kindly come up with a new reason to oppose, or oppose with no reason at all. Anything is fine, but saying there's an error, where there is none. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

I checked and double checked, there is definitely a vertical line where I pointed out. But well, never mind. No need to beat a dead horse whale. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 00:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Guess what, now I found it. I wish you told me about "a vertical line" right away. I was looking at that blue place that seem to be an ocean that got to the whale. So, I returned your oppose vote back, because you were right. If you wish to review the image once again, it is fine, if you, do not, that's fine too. Thanks, and sorry, and please do accept my apology --Mbz1 (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Kj-swing.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:00, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Jasonraize3.gif, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 00:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

File:AmandaSchullSydneyPremier.jpg

File:AmandaSchullSydneyPremier.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Ytoyoda (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Erickoston.jpg

File:Erickoston.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 06:36, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ref_MarkShield.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ref_MarkShield.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ref_MarkShield.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 06:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:MFTMAY.Carlos.1.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:MFTMAY.Carlos.1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MFTMAY.Carlos.1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Ytoyoda (talk) 06:45, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Maurilbert,
could you elaborate why you request File:GRAND PRIX DU "STADE FRANCAIS" 0071.jpg for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi,

IIRC, I uploaded this file by mistake, and the name/description/file contents didn't match. It now appears that only the description was wrong, not the name of the file. Sorry about that. I corrected the description and everything should be OK. Thanks ! --MAURILBERT (discuter) 19:37, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Harald_Mollers.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Harald_Mollers.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Bryan

Hey, I have seen what did you do with the foto of American Dragon... can you do the same with this fotos?

File:Daizee....jpg File:AJ & Matt....jpg File:A-U-S-T-I-N ARIES.jpg File:Homicidal....jpg

Thanks --Techarrow (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

PS:Also, can you crop the photo of File:Rosa Mendes.jpg

File:Bruce_Irons_Billabong_Pipeline_Masters_2009.jpg

File:Bruce_Irons_Billabong_Pipeline_Masters_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:57, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Diana_King_by_Lucas_Lopez.jpg

File:Diana_King_by_Lucas_Lopez.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 10:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

File:OlteanuBogdan.jpg

File:OlteanuBogdan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 10:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Noami-Listning-The-Question.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Noami-Listning-The-Question.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Noami-Listning-The-Question.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Denniss (talk) 03:49, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Noami-Listning-The-Question.jpg

File:Noami-Listning-The-Question.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:07, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Hardhead Duck Image

Hello, sorry I didnt realise my photo needed to be at least 2 megapixels, I took that photo with a Nikon D90 in raw format so I uploaded a new version, can you please take a look and change the template if its good enough.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Yang_di-pertuan_agong_ke-13.PNG

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Yang_di-pertuan_agong_ke-13.PNG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Yang_di-pertuan_agong_ke-13.PNG]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 05:09, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Greetings!

Hello, I see that you lightened a photo I uploaded of Brian Jones from the Rolling Stones! Thanks! I've uploaded over 800 photos for use where I edit the biographies of musicians, my area of interest. I mostly work in en.Wikipedia- same user name there. Would you be willing to try to lighten or crop any photos? I knew NOTHING about use of computers until I began working on the Wikipedia just a few years ago! If so, would you consider lightening this photo? [1] It is of Mick Taylor performing with John Mayall. Thanks. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 10:55, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:HICHAM AABOUBOU.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:HICHAM AABOUBOU.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:HICHAM AABOUBOU.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Diannaa (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Neve Sha'anan - bus boarding platforms to Tel Aviv Central Bus Station.jpg

Hello Maurilbert. Thanks to your comment in Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Neve Sha'anan - bus boarding platforms to Tel Aviv Central Bus Station.jpg, the creator of the file, Roi Boshi, spent some time fixing it and the stitching mistakes it had. Can you take a look and check if it's okay now? Tomer T (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Tarbes_Town_Hall,_Hautes-Pyrénées,_France.JPG

File:Tarbes_Town_Hall,_Hautes-Pyrénées,_France.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.248.22.92 07:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Réchauffoir ou réchaud noir ?

Bonjour,

Pas de souci pour ce qui est d'éclaircir ou remanier les photos. Pour ce qui est de leur mise en ligne, je préfère les voir en travail dérivé (donc comme étant un autre fichier), afin de laisser le choix à l'utilisateur (sombre sans grain ou clair avec grain).

Peux-tu y remédier ?

Merci, Trizek ^{here or on fr:wp} 08:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Advani Family.JPG

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Advani Family.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Advani Family.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

SpacemanSpiff (talk) 11:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Nick_Pickard.jpg

File:Nick_Pickard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 02:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Colosseo di Roma panoramic.jpg

Hello Maurilbert. I saw your comment on my candidate for FP of the colosseum. I hadn't noticed about that! Anyways, I tried my best to fix it (not easy at all with so many tourists on the way). I think the reult is acceptable. Thanks for the note 'cos I wouldn't have noticed. Greetings --Paolostefano1412 (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome ! --MAURILBERT (discuter) 19:10, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Arm-ghost.jpg

File:Arm-ghost.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Japs 88 (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:P1080038 - Isabelle CHATELLARD.JPG

File:P1080038 - Isabelle CHATELLARD.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Esby (talk) 23:26, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Fotosalcesgrain.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fotosalcesgrain.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fotosalcesgrain.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

-mattbuck (Talk) 10:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Chez Ashton Hamel 03.JPG

File:Chez Ashton Hamel 03.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Chesdovi (talk) 11:03, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Songyos Sugmakanan.jpg

File:Songyos Sugmakanan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

182.52.49.16 14:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 18:05, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

File:P1080449 - Elena LENINA.jpg

File:P1080449 - Elena LENINA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Torin (talk) 06:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Paul Farrer in Studio.jpg

File:Paul Farrer in Studio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Houben RT in Studio.jpg

File:Houben RT in Studio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:05, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

File:P1060280 Paris XII gare de Lyon Train bleu rwk.JPG

Bonjour Maurilbert,

félicitations et merci pour ce traitement d'image tout-à-fait réussi ! Amicalement--Mbzt (talk) 13:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Montreal 2010.jpg

File:Montreal 2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Gunnex (talk) 18:18, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Emily Perkins.jpg

File:Emily Perkins.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Trijnstel_talk 16:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Ted-Hughes-March1993.jpg

File:Ted-Hughes-March1993.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Bill goldberg.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Bill goldberg.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

-- Cirt (talk) 00:42, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Jamesgunnsigning.jpg

File:Jamesgunnsigning.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Guanaco (talk) 20:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Robert Lopez Jeff Marx Tony Awards.jpg

Yours sincerely,   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Robert Lopez Jeff Marx Tony Awards.jpg

File:Robert Lopez Jeff Marx Tony Awards.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Jeff Marx is pictured and the alleged copyright holder. Not a selfie. No evidence Jeff Marx is the copyright holder. Unauthorized use of Ticket:2010111410016551. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

  — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Brian Jones 1965.jpg

File:Brian Jones 1965.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Laser brain (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured sound candidates

		We request the honor of your presence at Featured sound candidates
		Dear Maurilbert, Featured sound candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating sounds for the FS tag. You can start reviewing/nominating sounds now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page) 19:27, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:CatherynneMValente.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CatherynneMValente.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:CatherynneMValente.jpg]]). If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Sealle (talk) 14:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)