Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Someone who's wrong on the internet!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

intended deletion? edit

Hi, your Javascript "User:Someone who's wrong on the internet/common.js" is tagged for speedy deletion. Was this intentional or an unintentional side-effect of your editing? --Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

yes Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 07:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
I do not see a speedy deletion template on the page. I have no clue what you're talking about. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 07:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

My photo is copyrighted edit

I think you're crazy because all my pictures are taken from the artist's agency, can you tell me where you found it?--Thebuiquochuy (talk) 06:25, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'm the photographer and I'm the copyright holder of this photo, do I have to ask for my own permission to use this image sir, it's crazy Thebuiquochuy (talk) 06:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:WheelTransBus.jpg edit

 
File:WheelTransBus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:13, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Sarajevo Nigel Osborne and cello in snow.jpg edit

 
File:Sarajevo Nigel Osborne and cello in snow.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— JJMC89(T·C) 06:04, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Derek Williams, Nigel Osborne, Ermin Elezovic.jpg edit

 
File:Derek Williams, Nigel Osborne, Ermin Elezovic.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— JJMC89(T·C) 06:06, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Nigel Osborne.jpg edit

 
File:Nigel Osborne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— JJMC89(T·C) 06:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion edit

 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Gbawden (talk) 08:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:The National Forest logo.svg edit

 
File:The National Forest logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

plicit 00:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good catch! edit

Thanks for catching SUPER GOLDEN, OXYTECH, NITROGEN and helping keep Commons spam-free. I just deleted a bunch of their uploads and issued them a warning. ─ Aafī (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

No prob! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply