Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Однажды у берега моря. Панорама.jpg

File:Однажды у берега моря. Панорама.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2016 at 15:03:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Peter the Great Gulf, Sea of Japan. Russia. Сreated by Андрей Кровлин - uploaded by Андрей Кровлин - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, this pic is just too heavily processed/retouched for me. There is clearly a lot of post-processing done and yet no {{Retouched picture}} is added to the file, there are clone marks on the cliffs on both sides of the horizon, some coordinates would also be nice since it is associated with a protected area that few people outside Russia understands the meaning of. A translation of the description in say English, French, Spanish or German could also be added to better understand the pic. It would make a great cover for a fantasy novel though. w.carter-Talk 20:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very unusual-looking scene. I do agree that there's something that looks a bit off about the water and sky at full size, but I'm satisfied with the picture at full-page size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellents colors and amazing sharpening, exposition, etc. --The Photographer (talk) 00:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per W. Carter. I do understand this was a long exposure, but we should know more about what was done in post. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per W. Carter --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:50, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support − Meiræ 11:12, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but simply too much HDR kitsch. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:30, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the otherworldy eerie vibe I get from this. ~★ nmaia ^{[[mia diskuto]]} 14:57, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support INeverCry 17:28, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Alchemist.--Jebulon (talk) 18:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unnatural --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:31, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per w.carter who I agree completely. I like the picture but it's not quite up to what I expect from Wikipedia/Commons FP standard. Post-process has gone through too much artistic freedom to be concidered educational. Too little useful information is provided. I would understand better if such picture was a purposeful showcase of a post-processing technique. --Ximonic (talk) 12:46, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1, too much HDR kitsch. --Ralf Roleček 14:40, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Milseburg (talk) 06:52, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:41, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]