Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:011218-N-9769P-047 F-A-18 With Weapons Ready for Mission.jpg

File:011218-N-9769P-047 F-A-18 With Weapons Ready for Mission.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2009 at 13:12:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jayme Pastoric - uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by User:Diaa abdelmoneim -- Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support This may be one of the best images we have of the F/A-18 Hornet on Commons giving the front of the jet in a great composition. -- Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:12, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, I couldn't resist: http://leafnode.soup.io/post/21983647/o :D --Leafnode✉ 13:27, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it time for a new category 'LolJets'? :)) --AngMoKio (talk) 13:54, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ooh, yeah forgot about that... fixed now...--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 13:57, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Dynamic range is excellent, as is composition, but resolution is too low. -- JovanCormac 15:38, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Resolution criteria is over 2 MP. This is 2.6 MP... I know it's close to 2 MP but if the criteria has changed this should be stated in the guideline. How large should it be? 3MP ?--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - That issue has been discussed to death (I don't even know which one of the numerous related threads to link to here; this is a recent one), and it appears to be the opinion of a vast majority that the guidelines are non-binding (compare the repeated refusal of the community to delist File:Evstafiev-bosnia-cello.jpg, which has 0.3 MP only). Everyone seems to apply his or her own guidelines (otherwise we'd just purge every single image on this page from FP); therefore, so do I. My opinion is that a Featured Picture should be of sufficient quality to be printable at a reasonable size (say, an A4 page). I will still decide on a case-by-case basis, but in general anything below 5 MP is insufficient for me. -- JovanCormac 16:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition and lighting are spectacular enough to ignore the regrettable resolution. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 06:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support GerardM (talk) 20:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support As per anon dissident. -- Petritap (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per AD. --Lošmi (talk) 08:45, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikiwaner (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles#Air