Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:1 cusco cuzco peru panorama 2014.jpg

File:1 cusco cuzco peru panorama 2014.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2016 at 19:24:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created & uploaded by Chensiyuan - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I haven't decided how to vote on this nomination, but a few observations: This is certainly a valuable and well-composed photo which, to my mind, unquestionably deserves Valued and Quality Image approval if nominated. So that's all on the plus side. On the minus side is a degree of noise in the sky, though not that much, and haze on all the hills beyond the city that makes them less inviting to look at than I'd prefer. In general, I think we've seen some panoramas of cities and surrounding countryside that are a lot sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:13, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Excellent picture and I'll support this nomination given that you remove the several dust spots in the sky. A little bit of noise reduction in the sky would be appreciated, too. --Code (talk) 05:48, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't have the technical ability to make these changes. Tomer T (talk) 18:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done, I think. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm not seeing a difference, and I cleared my cache. Did you do anything other than remove dust spots that I hadn't seen in the first place? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      - Denoised (Noise Ninja setting 13, sky only) and dust spots removed (I counted about 12, looks like there was just one or two specks on the sensor which got multiplied by the stitching of the panorama). I didn't touch anything else. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
        OK, I do see a bit of denoising in the sky. I'm still undecided on the picture as a whole, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per above. Daniel Case (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:38, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]