Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2013.06.27.-44-Ahrensberg-Ochsenzunge.jpg

File:2013.06.27.-44-Ahrensberg-Ochsenzunge.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2016 at 06:51:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

I realize they probably aren't ... but it's just hard to tell. Daniel Case (talk) 00:00, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strange: they do seem over-saturated to me. Charles (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •   Comment I've compared this version with the raw-file now again. I couldn’t find lost details and I haven't made strong noise reduction either. Also I compared this plant with other pictures on wikimedia. That doesn't confirm to me what you think to see. --Hockei (talk) 10:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
If no detail was lost, then the original isn't sharp. There are definitely many blurry areas with occasional details that are emphasised by strong sharpening. If you call that selective sharpening or noise reduction is really mostly a matter of term definition, but it's not what reality looks like. — Julian H. 10:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 16:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]