Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:300° Diedamskopf Panorama.jpg

File:300° Diedamskopf Panorama.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2010 at 21:54:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created and uploaded by Böhringer - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose great panorama and high ev. the stitching is not convincing (see gradients in the skies) and four different angled lens flares are really awkward. rule of thirds should be right on the couple sitting on the bench. group left from the antenna is rather distracting due to crop through their bodies. would support a fixed version. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 22:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- I'm not fond of extreme panoramas because they don't offer a realistic picture of the subject. In this particular case, I also agree with Peter Weis. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wish there were no flare, but still a great image!--Mbz1 (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- Oldukça başarılı ve emek verilmiş bir çalışma olmasına rağmen teknik sorunlar nedeniyle olumlu olamıyorum. Ancak kesinlikle tebrik edilmesi gereken bir çalışma. Mulazimoglu (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mbz1. --Cayambe (talk) 09:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:26, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Excellent line of sight and DOF. Good overall quality, although the flare is problematic. I do not fancy the high geometric warp of the bench, where verticals are far from being vertical. I do appreciate that there are people in the foreground as it adds depth to the photo. --Slaunger (talk) 21:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support See Mbz1 --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 21:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Barring stitch error discoveries. --IdLoveOne (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support –hover Fly | chat? 17:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral the flare is problematic. Something about this photo feels too busy too. --nsaum75 ^¡שיחת! 18:33, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danke für die Nominierung. Die Linsenflecken sind extrem schwer zu entfernen, ich habe es probiert, aber leider ohne Erfolg. --Böhringer (talk) 21:42, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OpposePer Peter Weis and Alvesgaspar.--Jebulon (talk) 00:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flare --99of9 (talk) 03:33, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FieldMarine (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great view, but per others, the flares in the sky are problematic. LeavXC (talk) 02:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Because of flares. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Cancelled vote as user already voted once in this nomination. --Slaunger (talk) 18:36, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh yes, sorry. My mistake--Jebulon (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas