Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aquila chrysaetos (Linnaeus 1758).jpg

File:Aquila chrysaetos (Linnaeus 1758).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2011 at 00:48:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Steven Walling • talk 06:56, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:37, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:41, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 12:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 12:57, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose another eagle portrait. Now wow, nothing outstanding to me, sorry. I don't like the angle, too. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:19, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - I agree with Carschten. I also feel that the face of the eagle could be sharper. It's a good picture, but there's nothing about it deserving featured picture status. --Claritas (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, Claritas, I made a sharper update. Please see the enlarged image in the resolution 1600 x 1200. I see very small details in the eye and on the feathers of the face. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's looking better. Consider me Neutral. --Claritas (talk) 08:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Achird (talk) 23:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like the warm colours of this eagle versus the background and I feel the composition is quite good also. But the pattern in the feathers looks somewhat posterized and grainy to me. --Ximonic (talk) 12:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Trongphu (talk) 23:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support--H. Krisp (talk) 18:41, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question I'd love to know what lense and what aperture you used --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Nikon D 300 with AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm 1:2.8 G ED, exposure 1/60 sec, aperture 1:8, ISO 200, -1.7 LW, sRGB, date 2010/12/28, 15:00:53. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 22:20, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose New version looks unnatural. Per Ximonic. –Makele-90 (talk) 03:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Sasha Krotov (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds