Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:B-1B over the pacific ocean.jpg

File:B-1B over the pacific ocean.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2010 at 17:14:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by the USAF - uploaded by Uwe W. - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 20:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice looking high quality picture. Joe Chill 2 (talk) 21:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - More USAF military propaganda - MPF (talk) 23:10, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality & size could be better, given it's a professional photographer. Also it is not a very striking image (composition & background) --ianaré (talk) 00:12, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not perfect. --Mile (talk) 12:11, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support To counterbalance MPF’s oppose (my reason is as “serious” as opposing for hypothetic propaganda). Diti the penguin — 12:54, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit noisy considering the size and the professional conditions. Maybe it is a detail of a larger picture. --Mbdortmund (talk) 21:32, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am no fan of propaganda but I think that it is not a valid reason to vote against an FP. Quality, cropping etc. is solid and therefor I support. Amada44 ^{talk to me} 18:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - de 500ko + bruit +petit taille = X --HAF 932 (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yay, USAF propaganda FTW. Wolf (talk) 21:36, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality could be better, regardless of the subject. Subject needs more breathing room compositionally. Steven Walling 21:47, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per MPF. Yann (talk) 13:24, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--M Zaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 05:19, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per MPF. Kleuske (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cody escadron delta (talk) 10:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:38, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]