Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biesenbachviadukt05 2016-01-17.jpg

File:Biesenbachviadukt05 2016-01-17.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Feb 2016 at 22:06:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Biesenbachviadukt05 2016-01-17.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Biesenbachviadukt05 2016-01-17.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by KlausFoehl -- KlausFoehl (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- KlausFoehl (talk) 22:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
•  Question What are those white spots in the sky? Are they tiny clouds or frost or snow on the camera's lens? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Info There were some clouds. The small white spots (oversharpened in the downscaled images), that is snow that was blown off nearby trees. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

• So that's snow that was in the air while you took the photo? If so, that's completely reasonable. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral Could be sharper, fixable? I think the spots are definitvely snow, for they are not only in the sky, but everywhere. --Llez (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

•  Info In-camera sharpening switched off. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

::*The white spots are still there. Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:31, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

•  Neutral Per Llez. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Sharpened version of image, using image manipulation software gimp. The white spots, the snowflakes, are often outside the depth of field and also show motion blur. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- KlausFoehl (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment I'm having trouble seeing the difference between the two versions. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
•  Info @Ikan Kekek: Sorry, uploaded a new image version but linked the old one. Rectified. -- KlausFoehl (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for correcting that. The differences between the two versions are subtle, to my eyes. The bridge is pretty, but I'm not fully convinced by the composition, so I'm going to abstain on both versions. Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 9 February 2016 (UTC)