Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (5).JPG

File:Bieszczady - sunrise from Chatka Puchatka (5).JPG, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jan 2016 at 08:46:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural or Architecture?
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support Detail could be sharper in the background but it seems to me you decided it was better to avoid clipping instead, and I think that was the better choice. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground is too dark; the black building gets a bit lost in it. INeverCry 19:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice place and great light in some areas, but the composition doesn't work too well in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 15:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Foreground in shadow. Random people. Ugly/untidy building spoils what could be a nice landscape/weather photo. -- Colin (talk) 21:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. Firebrace (talk) 01:49, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the place is beautiful, the mood very nice and that stay a nice photo however, per others, the large shadowed area prevent me to support. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:54, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]