Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buchenwald-bei-Weimar-am-24-April-1945.jpg

File:Buchenwald-bei-Weimar-am-24-April-1945.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2009 at 12:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Senator Alben W. Barkley of Kentucky, a member of a congressional committee investigating Nazi atrocities, views the evidence at first hand at Buchenwald concentration camp. Weimar, Germany. Source- US Gov. Archives - nominated by Anon.
Oppose Mainly the composition. Maybe valued image? --Ernie (talk) 13:29, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the composition is great and interesting, but this needs to be restored before I support. -- JovanCormac 14:24, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lest we forget L-Bit (talk) 20:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lošmi (talk) 21:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good heavens this deserves to be featured, restored or not. Thank you very much for one of the year's most important nominations. Durova (talk) 23:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When there are obvious ways to improve the image, it should not be featured yet. --99of9 (talk) 01:26, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Silversmith Hewwo 10:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs restoration. —kallerna™ 15:30, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support it now. If a restored version will uploaded I will support it and we can delist this. --Phyrexian (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 21:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd prefere a restored version of this important image. --Cesco77 (talk) 21:57, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Due to prior commitments I am unable to restore this image at this time, but would be glad to coach if some other editor would like to work on it. If interested please email for my Skype ID. Durova (talk) 22:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very important historical image. Can't expect the best quality for a 1945 foto. --Korman (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - What a stunningly moving image. Even with worse quality this would be a great featured picture - Peripitus (talk) 05:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - GerardM (talk) 13:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC) I love the composition, the man has to realise what happened before he can more further .., yes, a higher resolution would be good, but is not essential ... this is not a digital snapshot ...[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Historically precious. It is a valued picture, but it needs restoration for being a featured image. --High Contrast (talk) 11:18, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kozuch (talk) 18:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical