Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cappuchin Bridge (30706076020).jpg

File:Cappuchin Bridge (30706076020).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2017 at 12:14:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Cappuchin Bridge over the Selška Sora in Škofja Loka, Slovenia.
Info Created by Bernd Thaller/FlickR - uploaded by Sporti - nominated by — Yerpo ^Eh? 12:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yerpo ^Eh? 12:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice image, look a bit noise --The Photographer 12:16, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You're right, it is a bit noisy in the darker parts, but I think it doesn't detract from other qualities too much. — Yerpo ^Eh? 12:18, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I added some noise reduction in the image, please, let me know what do you think --The Photographer 13:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice picture. A little over-processed perhaps, with the sky showing a little posterisation and sharpening halo appearing in the top left. There are a few dust spots in the sky. But the subject, composition and light are very pleasing. -- Colin (talk) 12:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light and the composition trumps what minor tech problems there are. Very beautiful! --cart-Talk 13:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Lovely, but please fix the three very prominent dust spots at the upper right corner as soon as you can. If those aren't fixed, this photo should not be featured, so I will be keeping tabs on this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per others. Done I removed all the dirt I could find, there was quite a few. – Lucas ^T 14:35, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed too all the dust spots in the same time and I'm sorry maybe my version was creating a conflict with your version. --The Photographer 14:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I compared the two and I couldn't find any spots in your version that I cleaned. Seems we both got them all ;) – Lucas ^T 14:56, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted myself, I think that your version look better. I am sorry for the conflict --The Photographer 15:50, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Nice detail, although I wish something could be done about that unnaturally steely sky color ... looks like he was using a GND, but of course you can't tell. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 13:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 21:37, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could almost be a painting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely picture --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 10:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Halavar (talk) 22:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:08, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes