Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chur Busbahnhof ext 2015.jpg

File:Chur Busbahnhof ext 2015.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2016 at 09:30:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Cayambe -- Cayambe (talk) 09:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cayambe (talk) 09:30, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I enjoy looking at this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's nice and high in quality. The crop is quite tight all around though, and as a result, there is no good composition in my eyes. — Julian H.^✈ 10:46, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The crop seems ideal on the right side and acceptable on the left side, to my eye and mind. How would you have done it differently? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe some space on the left, top and bottom? Or a symmetrical composition from further left? I don't know the surroundings, so I'm not sure if or where there is a good composition there. It's ok for showing the building, but that's not the standard for FP. — Julian H.^✈ 11:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Structures like these demonstrate lightness and airiness. But that's what I miss in this composition. It looks more closely, as the viewer can expect. --Hubertl 13:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition does not work for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:51, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Please, see see the alternative nomination with a wider crop on both sides. --Cayambe (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version over alternative; I don't find the crop too tight and there are fewer of the distracting ad posters at right (I wonder how Paramount Pictures is going to like having their trademarked logo for The Devil Wears Prada appropriated that way?). Daniel Case (talk) 01:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, of which I wasn't aware. I'd like to imagine that the company, through its advertisement company, paid for the license to use it. The Devil Wears Prada itself conspicuously features quite a lot of brands, like Apple, Bang and Olufsen, Porsche, Prada, etc :-) --Cayambe (talk) 17:13, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Neither version has composition that impresses me. --Pine^✉ 08:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative edit

Support much better, I like this version! --Hubertl 19:31, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 09:50, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support also fine with me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:57, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:49, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:19, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I remain perfectly fine with the original but do prefer this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:41, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Neither version has composition that impresses me. --Pine^✉ 08:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Óðinn (talk) 15:02, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support as author. --Cayambe (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:25, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

The chosen alternative is: File:Chur Busbahnhof ext 2015 wide.jpg