Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cicindela marginata Fabricius - ZooKeys-245-001-g012.jpeg

File:Cicindela marginata Fabricius - ZooKeys-245-001-g012.jpeg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2013 at 14:54:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created Yves Bousquet, uploaded by Daniel Mietchen, nominated by Christoph Braun (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christoph Braun (talk) 14:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this picture really free ? no need for an OTRS permission ? --Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's Fig. 12 from an article that has been published under CC BY 3.0, so no need for an OTRS permission for this one, nor for the 39 similar files from the same article. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 00:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It lacks of a scale, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Information added to caption. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support From a photographic standpoint this one is very good. Compared to other photos of insects here the light is very good and not that harsh as it is ofter with other still insect shots (even those which become FP). --Tuxyso (talk) 10:04, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a photo or a drawing? Difficult to tell. The description should make that clearer. --Tiergärtner (talk) 12:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Information added to caption. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:20, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great to have some WiR/OS content of such high quality and resolution on top of the educational value they all have.--99of9 (talk) 04:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a list of other potential FP candidates and invite feedback on which ones to submit. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 23:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 16:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ee-yaah! If I feel like reaching out to knock it off my screen, it's a great picture fo a bug. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support J Kadavoor J e e 05:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A really good picture, but I think the background is not a good choice. We have white setae especially at the legs and the antennae, many of them are nearly invisible on the white background. A black (or at least a darker background) would show better the arrangement of the setae. --Llez (talk) 10:58, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The lighting is poor because he does not see very metalic colors, animals. The resolution is low for a studio work on a monted specimen. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Chmee2 (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:34, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods