Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dagestani man and woman.jpg

File:Dagestani man and woman.jpg, featured edit

Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2009 at 23:32:23

Info created by Sergei Mikhailovich Prokudin-Gorskii, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 23:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support A color photograph from 1904. Yann (talk) 23:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose would support cleaned up version (i.e. blue spots on woman's face) --ianaré (talk) 06:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support --ianaré (talk) 03:38, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Needs restoration. —kallerna™ 13:19, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Would support if properly restored. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried to restore it. This is a first for me for this kind of work. If anyone can do better, please help. Yann (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Neutral After your talk page message, I took a longer time to review it and its history. I've decided I can't oppose. I also can't support, though, since I would prefer a superior restoration. Ram-Man makes a fair point, though. —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 13:09, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Albertus teolog (talk) 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Does not need restoration. "Anyone" could produce a restored version, but this also has the side effect of demonstrating photo aging. It's a good period portrait. -- Ram-Man 16:31, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Simpledot (talk) 07:14, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support agree with Ram-Man --AngMoKio (talk) 07:23, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, another great early colour photograph. --Aqwis (talk) 14:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Due to its age, all calls for restoration should be ignored. It is a fantastic image! Booksworm (talk) 17:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I prefer the restored version. Downtowngal (talk) 20:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Ram-Man. Lycaon (talk) 07:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good. --Karel (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support good and rare --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:28, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral => featured. Maedin\^talk 12:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]