Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Desna river Vinn meadow 2019 G01.jpg

File:Desna river Vinn meadow 2019 G01.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2019 at 22:18:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Fog
Info Mist (visible atmospheric water) shortly before sunrise. Desena river, Ukraine
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:18, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ It might have been a wonderful place and probably an exquisite moment, but like this one for me this picture is too dark, or contains too many obscur areas -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:01, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral with the shadows enhanced. But the picture is still not amazing me -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I like this one much more (mist and more visible content)-- Basile Morin (talk) 02:54, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Quite all right but missing something.--Peulle (talk) 10:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support great atmosphere. Tomer T (talk) 10:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I didn't expect to go for this at first, but the composition has grown on me. It's better than your last foggy shot. Cmao20 (talk) 21:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 10:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMHO, it needs some more dehaze-saturation, because it looks quite flat. --C messier (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any object in a fog loses its shadow and looks flat. It looks natural IMO -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:48, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you go out to shoot fog, why on earth would you then use dehaze on it. It's kind of against what you are trying to capture. But bringing up the shadows quite a lot on this would work miracles. I tested to push the shadows in 'shadow/highlight' to about 20-25 and the image popped out. :) Same trick I used on this and this. --Cart (talk) 14:26, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Cart very much for your advice. I tried (just as a test), and it really improved the perception. I will recreate the image from the original shot afer a few hours -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. New version uploaded with lightening shadow areas a bit -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:59, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support The brightening gave it depth. --Cart (talk) 08:29, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:44, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captures the fragility of early morning. Daniel Case (talk) 17:43, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:13, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 15:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 09:08, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog