Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dom St. Peter und Paul (Brandenburg an der Havel) 01 (MK).jpg

File:Dom St. Peter und Paul (Brandenburg an der Havel) 01 (MK).jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Sep 2014 at 15:43:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The east nave of the Cathedral St. Peter and Paul in Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany. The whole interior painting is fresh restored and the interior of the cathedreal was just reopened at 14th Aug 2014.

At this one I´ve tried to implement the tips given at my last nom of a church inetrior. Which means I´ve tried to give more attention for managing the lights and the composition... c/u/n by me, mathias K 15:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- mathias K 15:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info -- Not in the best center? Can you fix? Alphama (talk) 18:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I think there is not much room for fixing. Sadly the big cross, the altarpiece and the stained glass aren't aligned perfect so there cant be a much better symmetrie... --mathias K 21:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's sadly a common problem. The people who arrange the chairs just aren't thinking of us architectural photographers. ;-) Diliff (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support And good exposure control. -- Slaunger (talk) 22:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ for now. Personally, I think it's lacking some contrast. I'd like to see the white/cream walls of the church a bit brighter. just my opinion though, since I wasn't there and can't be sure how they are supposed to look. Also, the white balance looks a bit wrong - too warm/red tinted. Again, I wasn't there, it does seem that the white walls are getting some reflected red from the bricks which makes them pink? Diliff (talk) 07:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Info I've uploaded a new version with a better WB with less reddish tint and a bit more contrast. I think Diliff was right again, even If he wasn`t there, but now it looks better to me... ;-) Thanks for the review! Slaunger could you please have a look again if you still like it?!--mathias K 08:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Much better, well done. The top of the white walls are close to real white, whereas the bottom which is receiving reflected light from the bricks is still pink-tinted. This is how it should be, to me. Diliff (talk) 09:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm fine with this version too. -- Slaunger (talk) 10:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:13, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:51, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support If David Iliff likes this who am I to argue? Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 19:40, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:36, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 16:17, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /DXR (talk) 21:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors