Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Duesternbrook Leopard auf Baum.jpg

File:Duesternbrook Leopard auf Baum.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2010 at 01:25:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ikiwaner - uploaded by Ikiwaner - nominated by Elekhh -- Elekhh (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Elekhh (talk) 01:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bgag (talk) 05:03, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:49, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice shot. But imo too tight crop at the top and the left. Would there be this more space, you would also see an attempt of the rule of thirds... --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice kitty. --Aktron (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO the leopard is the main feature of the picture. And from that viewpoint the composition is as I would expect.--Snaevar (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive landscape, the leopard is the cherry on the cake, very natural colours. May I suggest you to remove the tiny intruding tree branch at the ~~very left~~? --Cayambe (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC) I wanted to say: ... at the very right, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 16:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tree could be in piece, but that cat make it thru. --Mile (talk) 16:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome, definitively FP to me. --Murdockcrc (talk) 19:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Flawed composition: you can barely see the leopard at all and the tree is cut out of the frame partially. Steven Walling 19:43, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Per Steven Walling 75.95.115.127 22:27, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please log in to vote -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Interesting, good quality but not special enough to deserve the status. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:35, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support If this image of a leopard taken in a wild is not special enough, I do not know what is.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad composition per Steven Walling.--MASHAUNIX 17:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. I like the image, but poor composition to me at top and left--Miguel Bugallo 01:34, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps the image is not tilted, but the image seems tilted--Miguel Bugallo 01:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support The slightly cut off twig isn't miss-able to me nor enough to negate this highly interesting picture. --IdLoveOne (talk) 18:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cut off the tree doesn't bother me at all. Good composition, good quality and wow. --Lošmi (talk) 22:33, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Martin Kozák --Martin Kozák (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2010 (UTC) – Very problematic composition. Especially branch in front of the hill in middle of the picture is absolutely disgusting. In fact, it's very common photo of some tree in bush with something which looks as leopard if it's zoomed. Pardon. Colours and light aren't good too. Although it's sharp.[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 13:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:15, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Valuable, rare and of good technical quality, but composition not good enough. The leopard, which is the scoop of the photo fills too small a fraction of the frame, sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 08:56, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:00, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals