Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Elakala Waterfalls Swirling Pool Mossy Rocks.jpg

File:Elakala Waterfalls Swirling Pool Mossy Rocks.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2009 at 08:05:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ForestWander - uploaded by Raeky - nominated by Raeky -- — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 08:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 08:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yann (talk) 09:56, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well, if that's what swirling pools looks like Ter890 (talk) 10:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment IMO this is oversaturated. —kallerna™ 10:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the umpteenth waterfall photo we've seen here over the course of a few months, and I'm just about tired of them, but since this is the only one that stands out from the rest (by virtue of the swirling pool), it'd be wrong not to promote it. -- JovanCormac 10:17, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Airwolf (talk) 12:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support. One of the nicest waterfall images I've ever seen... It's just a shame that the rock on the left obstructs the whirlpool. This is a better composition, but not nearly as good technically. Diliff (talk) 13:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kosiarz-PL 14:13, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mbz1 (talk) 14:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic --Phyrexian (talk) 15:23, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support toll --Böhringer (talk) 15:28, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support I want to go there... AlexAH (talk) 18:19, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karel (talk) 19:36, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Durova (talk) 23:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support a little overprocessed (sharpness, saturation), very good nonetheless. --ianaré (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support eye candy :) --Leafnode 06:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated —kallerna™ 12:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated eye candy :-) Multimotyl (talk) 18:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe it's oversaturated but the Wow! is present. Jacopo Werther (talk) 19:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Really beautiful scene, but there's some quite heavy chromatic aberration especially in the top left part plus the already mentioned oversaturation. --NEURO ^⇌ 21:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A striking picture, but I must agree that it looks over saturated. That swirling pool, looks more like the ripples of a stone tossed in (concentric circles), but a good effect --Tony Wills (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oversaturated but in a good way :) /Daniel78 (talk) 20:32, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks unnatural to me. --Estrilda (talk) 05:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry. Beautiful, but oversaturated.--663h (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unnatural looking, over-saturated. Maedin\^talk 14:46, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice --Muhammad (talk) 14:58, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Claus (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oversaturated - Eye candy. - ☩Damërung ☩. -- 09:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 7 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Petritap (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places