Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fachada sul do edifício Copan.jpg

File:Fachada sul do edifício Copan.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Feb 2016 at 17:21:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created and uploaded by RTA - nominated by -- The Photographer (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 17:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm undecided and maybe leaning somewhat toward opposing this one, for two reasons: (a) The light seems very gray, accentuating the unattractiveness of the motif; (b) Parts of the picture, especially in the lower left, are quite blurry at full size and don't feel fully focused even at full-page size. I like the composition, though. I think the best solution would be for Rodrigo to retake this photo in a warmer light, with a much clearer focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually Ikan, I know most of that...

I told them to not nominate [1], because I'll try to go back there (This is a view from another building, and I need a authorization to enter there, and I don't know if I'll gonna get again).

However the problem is not the focus, is that this is a 250 mm in a APS body (400mm), and very low build quality lens. At the centre the sharpness is almost there, moving away from there, this start to be appalling. I didn't use any stack technique, or panoramic, to increase the sharpness, I just did a very quickly HDR because of the dark areas, and I was in a short time.

The problem of the cool colours are in a place that do not appears on the picture, first it is the South face, don't receive much of the light (and also the photos, that's why I uploaded), and also this is under repair, have long blue tissues covering both sides of this area, light is hitting hard there and creating this blue feeling, and I changed the real colour that I captured: [2].

Thanks for your time. :) -- RTA 18:47, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RTA the rules permit either nominators or authors to withdraw an image from FPC if that is how you feel. I don't see this image going anywhere if you didn't want it nominated. -- Colin (talk) 19:00, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Colin: "Could you nominate my picture?" [3] :) --The Photographer (talk) 19:55, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Photographer "no abre la aplicación de esta fotografía". This was not a ask for a nomination, was a ask for not nominate it. ;) -- RTA 23:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I'm sorry. Lost in translation portuspanfrenchglis --The Photographer (talk) 23:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Almost RTA, Almost! ;P 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS.: Sempre que precisar de mim para nomear alguma de suas imagens, contate-me. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I should have sought permission from RTA. --The Photographer (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]