Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel - Bryce Canyon National Park.jpg

File:Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrel - Bryce Canyon National Park.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Feb 2011 at 23:04:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by LeavXC - uploaded by LeavXC - nominated by LeavXC -- LeavXC (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LeavXC (talk) 23:04, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hairs on the squirrel´s back are lacking focus.--Snaevar (talk) 00:30, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful composition. Steven Walling 06:26, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice diagonal, but this is a bit on the soft side and I don't like neither the pose nor the fact that so much of the subject is hidden. It looks a bit like a lucky shot. - Benh (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk) 13:20, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the DoF is not good enough: the nose is out of focus. W.S. 10:06, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! --TFCforever (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Photo. --Thomas888b (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes! Nice one. Good composition and colors. --Aktron (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too many gray areas --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- - Are you referring to the imperfections in the rock? LeavXC (talk) 07:45, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would be proud to have taken this photo, but I don't think the animal posed quite well enough to make it to FP. I also agree with some others about the depth of field.--99of9 (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support considering that close view limits the depth of field. Ggia (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little more off-center than I would like, but it's good. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:49, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]