Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gours des grottes de Saint Marcel d'Ardèche, France.jpg

File:Gours des grottes de Saint Marcel d'Ardèche, France.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2012 at 20:19:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Getfunky Paris (Flickr) - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16 (talk)
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 20:19, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 21:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support DimiTalen (talk) 06:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice place and picture! I don't mind the small blown areas in this case. --Ximonic (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crop could've been better... But wow is huge for sure --Paolo Costa (talk) 17:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality is far from perfect, but big WOW! and caves are some of the most difficult places to take photos. --NJR_ZA (talk) 19:59, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, overexposed and blown areas, and important areas. --Miguel Bugallo 21:58, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thought it was a plagia of my own picture (Flickr has some), which is also FP for information : File:Grotte Saint Marcel bassins.jpeg. I think this one has better point of view (but has the flaw mentioned by Miguel). - Benh (talk) 15:04, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 21:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 23:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose low quality (clearly worse than File:Grotte Saint Marcel bassins.jpeg in direct comparison) and no special work, using a wide angle is not enough for a outstanding arrangement --Wladyslaw (talk) 21:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support fantastic picture--David საქართველო 11:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Overexposed and blown areas, see Miguel. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Miguel and Benh. Colin (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown areas, sorry, otherwise an excellent shot. --Cayambe (talk) 15:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I prefer the one we already have featured. Although the wide angle is better here, the light levels and picture quality are better in the one we've got. --99of9 (talk) 03:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural