Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:H-chka-52-5038.jpg

File:H-chka-52-5038.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2012 at 22:08:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by PereslavlFoto - nominated by Anonymous

* Support -- 46.120.8.164 22:08, 5 March 2012 (UTC) anonymous votings are not allowed. Please login first. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 00:13, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. Tomer T (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cathy Richards (talk) 20:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I do not see anything remarkable. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 20:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morning Sunshine (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I don't like too many things about this pic: framing, the power lines all along the image, the too pronounced perspective angle, the tight crop on the bottom with unbalanced composition, the avoidable lamp disturbing in front of the building, big CA's (mostly visible on the lower left part), the little sharpness... overall really not a FP to me. And finally, per Yuriy75. --Paolo Costa (talk) 16:56, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose 1) per Paolo Costa (several disturbing elements in the picture), 2) the blue veil somehow does not impress me in this case (there are many other blue hour pictures with a much better mood, compare e.g. to this one, the Irons Museum is better as well), and finally 3) unlike QI, FP candidates shall have a minimal notability - a simple (if not to say: ugly) apartment building fails to provide enough educational value for an "outstanding" picture. Therefore, the general conclusion: QI yes, FP no. - A.Savin 20:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:23, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]