Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Harescombe Church.jpg

File:Harescombe Church.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Mar 2012 at 22:25:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Saffron Blaze - uploaded by Saffron Blaze - nominated by Saffron Blaze -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cephas (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 09:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Interesting picture, but I have my doubts: clouds are overexposed and the green looks a bit darkish. DimiTalen (talk) 09:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Katarighe (Talk) 13:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:52, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty picture. Colin (talk) 21:17, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achird (talk) 21:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bit too dark, wrong white balance (too brownish) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:00, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Too Brownish? Obviously you haven't seen Cotswold Limestone. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I haven't, but I don't need to to see the image (I refer not only to the church) needs a white balance adjustment. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:29, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't make any sense to me. The church has the wrong white balance but the rest of the image is OK. Just for your info the stones are golden brown to browninsh ashlar limestone. So while it might appear wrong to you I can attest that it is in fact correct. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:10, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture