Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henk Fortuin 27-03-2003.JPG/2
File:Henk Fortuin 27-03-2003.JPG, not featured edit
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Feb 2016 at 08:49:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
- Info created by Ronald Wagenaar - uploaded by EdodeRoo - nominated by [[User:{{subst:Michielverbeek}}|]] -- Michielverbeek (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Support -- Michielverbeek (talk) 08:49, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm sorry, I don't find this portrait really impressive. It looks like there's a lot of chromatic aberration in the walls, for example, which look more kaleidoscopic than black in full size. I'm not sure anything is fully sharp, and did he always wear unkempt clothes and have a visible cut on his face? Are his paintings fairly represented in this picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry this does not fit the FP standards, quality wise. Strong chromatic noise in the dark parts, chromatic aberrations, red eye of the subject, harsh flash light, and flash shadows along the subject.--Jebulon (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Ikan Kekek and Jebulon. You don't even have to look at anything but the thumbnail to see that it's nothing more than a snapshot – note that the criteria for Featured Pictures at Commons are different from those at the different language versions of Wikipedia. Might make a decent Valued Image for the scope Henk Fortuin, though. --El Grafo (talk) 12:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: as per above comments. Yann (talk) 12:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)