Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kloster Seligenstadt.jpg

File:Kloster Seligenstadt.jpg, featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2022 at 16:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info Former Benedictine abbey in Seligenstadt, view from the garden. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not very outstanding + bended projection, which isn't very necessary with such a long focal + very visible stitching seams on the OOF foreground grass. - Benh (talk) 17:08, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. I see no issue with the projection --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wieggy (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Uoaei1. Beautiful, and by far the most representative photo of this – historically quite important! – abbey I have ever seen. --Aristeas (talk) 09:39, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The flaws can be seen on closer inspection, but they do not disturb the good overall impression.--Ermell (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:35, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 19:48, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 02:09, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support the crop may not be the best, but after reading Ermell's comment, it's not too noticeable at a first glance. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 12:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nythar^T^.^C 00:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support However, I do agree that the projection is not ideal, and perhaps f/11 would have made for better sharpness overall despite slightly higher diffraction. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:32, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany