Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti3.jpg

File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti3.jpg, not featured edit

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2012 at 19:08:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:08, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - very nice, but not FP for me. Crop too tight on both left and right, and plant on the left is distracting. Sorry. --Claritas (talk) 19:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Request perhaps a copyvio? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is art in public space --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wladysalw's right, there's freedom of panorama in Germany. --Claritas (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we have "freedom of panorama in Germany", but I think not only for the part of the arts. Take a look to Christo too. It was also an art in the publik space, but we don't habe images of his arts. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad comparison. Christos work was from the beginning planed to be not permanently. This art work is not planed to be demolished by the artist. This is an evident difference. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:42, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes, amazing graffiti. But crop is soooo tight, sadly. Also distracting branches shadows over it. --Paolo Costa (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The tight crop focuses on the art work. What's wrong about this? Would you prefer s.th. like this File:Lörrach - Tumringen - Wiesenbrücke Graffiti2.jpg? The branches are part of this composition because it's an urban graffiti and not a picture in a gallery. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is wrong with it. It is just not an optimal crop imo, as it should be for a FP. As for the branches, sometimes third agents like a branch, a lamp post, trash, etc. can be disturbing... it may not be the photographer's fault and they might be unavoidable. Still it makes the picture not featurable. I'd like a crop like this one, for example: http://www.arturban.co.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/daim-07.jpg --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Katarighe (Talk) 12:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Yes, FP for me -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:58, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. German FoP should apply. - A.Savin 18:15, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Claritas: nothing special for me. --Yikrazuul (talk) 11:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose tight crop --Citron (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support.Tight crop on the left. I like the branches of the tree and shadows merging with the graffiti, should be a bit more to give the impression of the surroundings, anyhow FP! --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solar Police (talk) 14:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose tight crop for me too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:00, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]